Yvan256 said:Given that miniDV (NTSC) is 720 x 480 and the iSight is 640x480, that wouldn't be too much of a drop in quality. Especially if you can record in H.264 (better than miniDV compression) and iPod storage (compared to miniDV tapes).
And the price (new device + iSight + 20GB iPod) would probably still be lower than an HD-based camcorder (especially given the number of people who already have an iPod, it makes the Apple solution purchasing price even lower).
The only missing thing would be the HD and widescreen part.
Which means three things, really:
- introduction of the iSight 2, HD and widescreen capabilities. Which makes no sense whatsoever, until a few seconds later.
- introduction of the new "Apple camcorder", which uses the iSight or iSight 2 (iSight 2 required for HD and/or widescreen) and has a cable to connect any dock connector iPod for the actual data recording which makes the camcorder even lighter (hard drive-based iPod required for HD recording).
- introduction of the 80GB iPod, to allow for longer recording times. It replaces the 60GB iPod. The 30GB iPod is also dropped in favor of a 40GB model. These new iPods get the new features found on the iPod nano.
And THAT is what Steve meant when he said "2005 would be the year of HD".
I like those ideas! If they were going to use an iSight and iPod, then I doubt it would have a separate display. Which means it would need to use a video iPod for playback, don't you think? The 'camcorder' would need some controller and processing chip, connectors, and a good physical body with handle and buttons (although the iPod click wheel would be used for controls too), but that would be about it. Probably another battery though. I wonder how much something like that would cost...
It seems unlikely Apple would ever do such a product, but if the video quality were good I would be all over it. It would be pretty small too, may be the same footprint of an iPod but thicker. Especially since I will be getting a new iPod soon, and already have an iSight...