Blu-Ray BTO options too!
No Blu-ray before the Mac Pro. I will fight this to the death.
Why has my signature changed. Statement. Who had the audacity to mess with my sig?!
Aha. New policy. They could have sent out PMs...
Blu-Ray BTO options too!
cr0nite said:But what could they change? The new Intel Chips are due in June...
MacRumors did have articles on the next update for Mac laptops being in June. It's not terribly surprising even if you did wait that entire time. Keep in mind I waited for the original Santa Rosa MacBook update from May until November as well.I would be rather upset if they released a new version THIS soon. I waited forever for a new update so I would get the most for my money, and to then have the quickest update to the MBP ever right after I finally buy would really really really suck. I'm all for progress, but geeze, I'd rather have them wait for the real update.
Once again why is the iMac being touted? The only benefit it can gain is a quad core processor which isn't out until much later this year. We're already getting the majority of the features of Montevina with the uprated Santa Rosa. The iMac can handle the heat of earlier laptop components while Apple's laptops are on the razor's edge of cooling.So one of the main arguments people are making is that Intel would force the switch. Does that mean they will force an iMac update again soon? Don't they use the same chips? That would be incredibly strange...just a few weeks or a month after the iMac update they have to release a newer one. Maybe thats why they overclocked the latest chips...would the new speeds line up with the newest processors so they could do a silent swap out of parts when they become available?
Mac Mini update seems so much more likely.
A 12/13inch MBP just doesn't make sense. The only real differentiation between the MB and MBP lines over time has been a separate graphics card. What's the point of having a great GPU for a machine with a tiny screen that isn't suited to running the applications that make best use of it?
No Blu-ray before the Mac Pro. I will fight this to the death.
Um...the MB/iBook/12"PB can all use an external monitor. I want a small form laptop to slip into my photo bag when I shoot on site. I had to settle for a MacBook since the 15" MBP was too big and bulky for my purpose. A 12/13" MBP would be the perfect machine for me.A 12/13inch MBP just doesn't make sense. The only real differentiation between the MB and MBP lines over time has been a separate graphics card. What's the point of having a great GPU for a machine with a tiny screen that isn't suited to running the applications that make best use of it?
Bundled with Duke Nukem Forever.
There are folks that will not buy a plastic laptop, regardless of specs. I do many keynote and powerpoint presentations in corporate settings. Trust me, I am breaking out the aluminum MBP vs the white or black macbook consistently.
The problem for is that the separate graphics card is a deal maker to most people, especially if you plan to use it for more than a year. More powerful programs demanding graphic power are available more than ever. In my opinion, a separate graphics card is a must have If you are looking for any longetivity in your purchase.
Ifever decides to make a 12/13 inch, aluminum MBP with a separate graphics card again, it would absolutely fly off the shelves.
4.) The 12 Inch PBG4 is iconic because the screen is set vertically as as opposed to the horizontal setup in the current Macbooks. This layout works perfectly on middle seats on airplanes. The screen layout is great for usingsoftware suites iwork, iLife, Word and others.
4.) The 12 Inch PBG4 is iconic because the screen is set vertically as as opposed to the horizontal setup in the current Macbooks. This layout works perfectly on middle seats on airplanes. The screen layout is great for usingsoftware suites iwork, iLife, Word and others.
What's the point of having a great GPU for a machine with a tiny screen that isn't suited to running the applications that make best use of it?
What do you mean, "the screen is set vertically"?
Very true... but these are the folk that the MBA is aimed at so an overlapping market for apple to avoid there.
Sad, but true.
Having said that the 12"PBs always did have very crappy graphics cards compared with the larger models. In the end they were little more than aluminum clad ibooks (which of course appeals to the corporate crowd as you suggest)
Again, my point exactly. There is no difference in a top of the line black Macbook vs a baseline MBP other than screen size and separate graphics card. Wrap a top of the line black MB in aluminum and separate graphics card and you are in business.
My intuition would be the same as yours here but apple either don't feel the same about market potential or see a small form pro machine as cannibalising too many other sales.
Then we can agree to disagree as I believe it would be a huge hit and not steal sales. I would not buy a MBA because of the sacrifices in specs. You buy a 15/17 inch MBP mainly for specs and screen real estate so those folks will buy those regardless.
I loved my 12" PB! (but I'm just as happy with my MBA + Blackbook)
![]()
What do you mean, "the screen is set vertically"?
I think they will. Maybe not tomorrow, but for sure before the end of June.
The Only reason Apple updated in Feb to Penryn processors was becaused they were forced to by Intel to replace all the 65mn (merom) chips. And it wasnt just apple, it was every other PC maker as well.