Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I said it earlier, but I don't think you will be able to look at RAM the same when comparing it to x86. Hell look at iPhones. They have had significantly less RAM than android phones for years without issue. My guess is 16gb with these chips is on par with 32gb of intel chips.

Another one 🤦🏻‍♂️ you people are making me so angry trying to defend this. Read my post two posts before this. Pro users need RAM. No Apple magic can change that. It's like you're suggesting it can alter the laws of physics. All it can do is swap faster due to the faster storage, but that does not make up for there being less RAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghitaeu and mi7chy
LOL. Goodbye. FYI, did not read the rest of your nonsense tirade past this line.

Ok so instead of learning from a Pro user who actually needs and uses a lot of RAM, you're content to ignore the facts and continuing spewing a load of rubbish. Fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghitaeu
The RAM is built inside the Apple Silicon M1 chip. There is no RAM expansion as there is no eternal RAM outside the M1 Chip. Should make for much faster RAM access speeds. You either order a Mac Mini with 8GB or 16GB of RAM inside the M1 Chip.

Highly doubtful. No CPU or even SoC has built-in RAM. It might be PoP (package-on-package) like the Raspberry Pis.
 
No. I am comparing max 2 applications open vs 10 + a myriad of services. I am simply stating that 16 GB of RAM max is ridiculously low. No matter how efficient you think the M1 is. They would have to unload apps into the ssd killing it prematurely and lowering the performance. I attached a printscreen from my mac right now. As you can see top 4 apps are using 8.5GB of RAM and I am not having anything too memory intensive open. View attachment 1658467
And my iMac right now has 24 GB used and 7 GB free.

I'm still not impressed with your point. I'm sure Apple Silicon is in a class of its own and soon tests will demonstrate that.
 
Ok so instead of learning from a Pro user who actually needs and uses a lot of RAM, you're content to ignore the facts and continuing spewing a load of rubbish. Fine.
I'm a Pro user that has a lot of RAM. You're someone who is stuck in the past.
 
my 2013 nmp has 64gb memory, firefox is using 8gb.. can 16gb take care of everything that 64gb could? we'll see i guess.

Macs have always used the RAM available to them. On your 2013 Firefox may use 8gb of RAM, but if I only have 8gb of RAM it would only use 2gb.
 
I might be the odd one here, but are the speakers on the Pro really that good?

I’m still with my Mac Air from early 2014 and it’s past due for an upgrade. I feel rushed whenever I’m at the Apple store so I can’t really try out the speakers between the Air and Pros. Thanks!
 
I'm a Pro user that has a lot of RAM. You're someone who is stuck in the past.

I am not stuck in the past. There is no magic Apple can do to make stuff use less RAM. If you open a 32GB image, for example, guess how much RAM that would use? Yes, 32GB assuming it's a bitmap. More if it was a JPEG that needed to be decompressed. And guess what happens if you don't have 32GB of RAM? macOS will use your SSD in a process known as "swapping" or "paging". And guess what else? That's exactly what Macs already do. And guess what? The new Macs can do it a little bit faster. But you know what the consequence of that is? Your SSD dies early.
 
.... so it makes sense for mac mini and macbooks yes, I do not see how that is gonna fit in desktop Pro line

no GPU options?

Apple is not Pro sector anymore

at least not for vectorial computation, 2D, 3D

you cannot have out there AMD RNA 2 and also new Nvidia Cards, and compete with...

your integrated GPU?

no way.....

How is the virtualization under those new Apple ARM?
Can I run VMWARE properly?
Android Studio is working fine on those new apple right?
they said no bootcamp... so I cannot dualboot and use Windows apps like years before?

so... thats a MacBook Pro right?
  • Apple M1 chip with 8-core CPU, 8-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine
  • 8GB unified memory
  • 512GB SSD storage¹
  • 13-inch Retina display with True Tone
  • Magic Keyboard
  • Touch Bar and Touch ID
  • Force Touch trackpad
  • Two Thunderbolt / USB 4 port
$1,499.00

for nearly same money 1557 eu on PC you get
(yes, I made the numbers the above configuration is real price with case and everything)

· Z490i ITX top market motherboard

· 1 TB 6GB/s M2 disk drive (samsung 980 Pro)
sequential read speed 7,000 MB/s and sequential write speed 5,000 MB/s
(new MacBook Pro ARM offers 3.3GB/s sequential speed, doesn't specify between read-write)

· 64 GB 3600Mhz DDR4 RAM
(you need to look for those without RGB lights, there are acceptable prices,
I have a list that I'm not gonna share [sorry] I wrote enough telling M2 brand)

· Intel Gen11 i7 8-core CPU, with integrated Intel XE Graphics

** note, you would need to wait between January-March for Intel to release the new processors, all the other hardware can be bought nowadays

In the future you could even upgrade it plugging AMD ARN2 graphic card (500 bucks more), so final price would be around 2000 - 2200 USD (in case you want or need that extra graphic force)

- also special note Xbox One Series X (new console) is running Windows 10 custom Operating System, all big brands are investing on those new consoles because they will get benefits trough videogames they are gonna sell

It is gonna be the standard for 4K media consume those next 7 years

Also if you want to use your computer for developing content and/or high computational tasks (the hardware configuration I wrote down would be minimum or recommended specs)

that's a real Pro Line


If you are a Pro computer user, better follow the standards (I have no doubt about it)

If you like laptopts.... then ok, you can always can waste your money on the apple laptop, sure you have a lot of battery life, and you could keep playing HeartStone

What would be the next?

Add the cow says Muuuu, on super wipy dippy laptop apple touch bar?


** also note Microsoft made a huge step up with Windows 10 Operating System

bye bye apple, you lost an user

common, is 2020 and you cannot even choose screens output under MacOS

yah, I guess your phone would be the best out there,
but a vitamined phone with keyboard is not gonna be my Pro hardware

anyway from years ago I hadn't been using laptop in personal space, desktop rocks, itx format is more than enough (even for professional use)
 
Last edited:
Macs have always used the RAM available to them. On your 2013 Firefox may use 8gb of RAM, but if I only have 8gb of RAM it would only use 2gb.

Actually, no. All things being equal (same webpages, number of tabs, etc) it would 2GB of RAM and 6GB of virtual memory (swapped to disk).
 
All built-in webcams suck - every one of them: junk compared to even the $25 Chinese webcams you can get on Amazon. I mounted my GoPro Hero 9 to the top of my monitor and it absolutely blows away anything I've seen short of a $600 mirrorless camera. OBS and other utilities will let you use real cameras for the work and the difference is shocking.
I’ve been thinking of selling my hero7 for a 9. Is it pretty much plug and play for things like FaceTime and zoom?
 
I am not stuck in the past. There is no magic Apple can do to make stuff use less RAM. If you open a 32GB image, for example, guess how much RAM that would use? Yes, 32GB assuming it's a bitmap. More if it was a JPEG that needed to be decompressed. And guess what happens if you don't have 32GB of RAM? macOS will use your SSD in a process known as "swapping" or "paging". And guess what else? That's exactly what Macs already do. And guess what? The new Macs can do it a little bit faster. But you know what the consequence of that is? Your SSD dies early.

Only a bad developer tries to load the whole object into RAM. You stream your object into the amount of RAM that's available...or at least that's how good developers do it.
 
Actually, no. All things being equal (same webpages, number of tabs, etc) it would 2GB of RAM and 6GB of virtual memory (swapped to disk).

I think people are going to be shocked when reviews confirm these crap all over intel based laptops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tdar
Any thoughts on whether the 8th GPU core is likely to be worth the extra $100 on the Air for a student? My grade 11 son's iPad sustained a broken screen, and I'm looking to replace it with an Air
 
Ordered a mini for 600 or so since I did need to replace an aging desktop cpu. Figured why not. I’ll stick with base. Cheapest way to mess around with it.
 
Only a bad developer tries to load the whole object into RAM. You stream your object into the amount of RAM that's available...or at least that's how good developers do it.
Sure, but for the high-resolution 3D content that they showed in the presentation, software like that already does texture streaming. And even when taking that into account, you can easily blow through 6-8GB of video memory while still texture streaming in realtime.

For the MacBook Air, no big deal. For the MacBook Pro 13, it's sad. For the Mac Mini, at its performance level claimed, it is unacceptably low and completely imbalanced.
 
Only a bad developer tries to load the whole object into RAM. You stream your object into the amount of RAM that's available...or at least that's how good developers do it.

If you're running a VM, or many, you can't "stream" parts of the virtualised OS in to memory. If you're using an IDE, you don't want to wait while it re-analyses your code continuously to "stream" it in to memory again. You need it there all the time.

I think people are going to be shocked when reviews confirm these crap all over intel based laptops.

You're confusing the amount of RAM a system has with its raw compute performance, which are not directly linked.

Yes, these things will **** all over Intel in benchmarks. No these things will not run a developer workflow as well as a machine with 32GB or 64GB of RAM because they'll be wasting so much time swapping to disk.
 
.... so it makes sense for mac mini and macbooks yes, I do not see how that is gonna fit in desktop Pro line

no GPU options?

Apple is not Pro sector anymore

at least not for vectorial computation, 2D, 3D

you cannot have out there AMD RNA 2 and also new Nvidia Cards, and compete with...

your integrated GPU?

no way.....

How is the virtualization under those new Apple ARM?
Can I run VMWARE properly?
Android Studio is working fine on those new apple right?
they said no bootcamp... so I cannot dualboot and use Windows apps like years before?

so... thats a MacBook Pro right?
  • Apple M1 chip with 8-core CPU, 8-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine
  • 8GB unified memory
  • 512GB SSD storage¹
  • 13-inch Retina display with True Tone
  • Magic Keyboard
  • Touch Bar and Touch ID
  • Force Touch trackpad
  • Two Thunderbolt / USB 4 port
$1,499.00

for nearly same money 1557 eu on PC you get
(yes, I made the numbers the above configuration is real price with case and everything)

· Z490i motherboard

· 1 TB 6GB/s M2 disk drive (samsung 980 Pro)
sequential read speed 7,000 MB/s and sequential write speed 5,000 MB/s
(new macbook ARM offers 3.3GB/s sequential speed, doesn't specify between read-write)

· 64 GB 3600Mhz DDR4 Ram

· Intel Gen11 i7 8-core CPU, with integrated Intel XE Graphics

** note, you would need to wait between January-March for Intel to release the new processors, all the other hardware can be bought nowadays

In the future you could even upgrade it plugging AMD ARN2 graphic card (500 bucks more), so final price would be around 2000 - 2200 USD (in case you opt or need that extra graphic force)

- also special note Xbox One Series X (new console) is running Windows 10 custom Operating System, all big brands are investing on those new consoles because they will get benefits trough videogames they are gonna sell

It is gonna be the standard for 4K media consume those next 7 years

Also if you want to use your computer for developing content (would be kinda minimum or recommended specs) and/or high computational tasks

that's a real Pro Line


If you are a Pro computer user, better follow the standards (I have no doubt about it)

If you like laptopts.... then ok, you can always can waste your money on the apple laptop, sure you have a lot of battery life, and you could keep playing HeartStone

What would be the next?

Add the cow says Muuuu, on super wipy dippy laptop apple touch bar?


** also note Microsoft made a huge step up with Windows 10 Operating System

bye bye apple, you lost an user

common, is 2020 and you cannot even choose screens output under MacOS

yah, I guess your phone would be the best out there,
but a vitamined phone with keyboard is not gonna be my Pro hardware

anyway from years ago I hadn't been using laptop in personal space, desktop rocks, itx format is more than enough (even for professional use)
Wait, you're comparing a small form factor lightweight laptop that's available to order today with a desktop you can build yourself with components that might be available in 4 months (think about how much trouble Intel has had getting silicon out in a timely manner recently)? That's not a very informative comparison. I've built a few PCs from scratch, and enjoyed the process, but if you're going to compare, at least compare apples with apples (no pun intended). Compare it with an extended battery life laptop with decent performance that's available today.
 
Yet another underwhelming event. I know these are the low enders but come on. The whole line up, presentation and lack of real info and road map for future machines was really poor. Oh Tim, what have you done to this once great, innovative company???
 
Any thoughts on whether the 8th GPU core is likely to be worth the extra $100 on the Air for a student? My grade 11 son's iPad sustained a broken screen, and I'm looking to replace it with an Air

Stick with base. Should be more than enough.
 
Basically, $300 differences in MacBook Air and 13" MacBook Pro gains:
  • About 10% longer battery life
  • Fan for longer sustained peak performance
  • 100 nits brighter (400 vs 500)
  • Better speakers and microphones
  • Touch Bar
  • 8 GPU cores vs. 7 (8 GPU cores is available on higher-end MacBook Air)
If these things don't excite you, then save $300 or so and enjoy:
  • Fanless operation
  • About 10% lighter weight (2.8 lbs vs 3.0 lbs)
  • Superior wedge form factor
  • Physical function keys
The MBP will be fanless too until it heats up enough to need the fan. Whereas the MBA will either simply cut the power output when it heats up, or get freaking hot. They've both got the same chip in them (except the 7 GPU option for MBA, but otherwise the same chip)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.