I can't remember the last time I used a lightning port. HDMI, or ad card. I do everything wirelessly. That's the idea if you think cables are better than wireless that's your problem. Plus you can get Apple care. And if you want to customize your computer why are you looking at a mac in the first place?They don't care about experience either
Removal of ports, removal of pro software, inflated prices, 1/10 repair ability and eye watering repair prices
If it's not true then why are they becoming more successful YOY?That's a tired mantra that hasn't been true in five years or more.
I can't remember the last time I used a lightning port.
Care to show me another PC OEM that does better? Acer? Asus? HP? Lenovo? Dell? Heck, Microsoft?
Show me a laptop OEM that gives me worldwide warranty as standard, where I can go to any of its retail establishment and service center around the world and get support.
Apple is not perfect, but before claiming Apple to be greedy etc, show me other companies that do better.
Hmmm scrubbing in iMovie could be pretty nice. I'm sure Final Cut will take advantage of it as well. The interesting thing with the 15" is comparing dedicated graphics models between 2015 and 2016 is now the 15" starts $100 LESS than last years model with probably a more powerful card. Granted last year also had an integrated only option but I'm curious what benchmarks will show.I got to play with one yesterday. The touch bar is pretty neat. Those who dismiss it should really look into it. I played with iMovie and using the bar to scrub and the tools is inventive.
Don't knock this one quite yet. Plus I added every filter I could on a HD movie clip (multi gigabyte file) and it never studdered and rolled along without a hitch. The 15" model is pretty powerful with 16gb of ram but base level processor. Very impressive.
In 2012, the retina was still a new thing for laptops. The price was more justified. Apples perceived value was also still at zenith. It isn't anymore. Its still high, but not as high as it used to be. And of course, the new gen machine would have faster/better, but does the Touchbar and incremental port upgrades really earn the price bump? That is up to the consumer to decide. I decide it doesn't. Others will disagree. That's fine.
Sure. They said the same thing about Jobs. They said the same thing about the MBP redesign in 2012.
If all apple cared about was profit, they'd instead have created the MBP with every port imaginable, with a touch screen, etc. so no potential buyer would have a reason to not purchase. It's exactly because Cook cares about the future that they are taking the risk of dropping legacy ports and certain functionality and inserting ports with connectors for the next ten years instead.
Really? The new Macbooks look very much forward looking.
So because I don't use a product the same way as you then there is something wrong with me?I can't remember the last time I used a lightning port. HDMI, or ad card. I do everything wirelessly. That's the idea if you think cables are better than wireless that's your problem. Plus you can get Apple care. And if you want to customize your computer why are you looking at a mac in the first place?
[doublepost=1478753014][/doublepost]
If it's not true then why are they becoming more successful YOY?
+1, the main issue with the new MBPs is the price on top of having to spend extra on dongles or cables.NB: I think the new MBPs are great-looking machines - its the pricing, plus the gouging on the cables and adapters that everybody will need to bootstrap their USB-C workflow that I don't like.
Being a developer your logic should really be better...I think I'm PRO enough (~30 years C/C++/Java/SQL development and I'm buying it. So, please, stop your nonsense.
Apple is greedyCare to show me another PC OEM that does better? Acer? Asus? HP? Lenovo? Dell? Heck, Microsoft?
Show me a laptop OEM that gives me worldwide warranty as standard, where I can go to any of its retail establishment and service center around the world and get support.
Apple is not perfect, but before claiming Apple to be greedy etc, show me other companies that do better.
Do you have to look at the esc key to press it or can you touch type it? Genuinely interestedNot something I'd have a problem with.
Complaints = half price dongles so it does work to complain.
The 2015 Mac book pro is not that long of a time ago that people should feel super deprived as you are suggesting. How often do you want to see new MBPs? Every 6 months? Every month?
If it causes you pain and suffering perhaps you need a breakHope shaving off a few dollars off those dongles was worth all the pain and suffering the whiners have caused us here.
They got cheaper dongles. So what's my reward for putting up with all this crap?
Click bait, even macrumours is cashing in, personally I hate the rise of click bait.Title is misleading. Those are not 'all' competing laptops. It's just a few of them cherry picked to create a chart. The MBP and MB columns are based on an estimate because Apple doesn't reveal break down figures.
I got to play with one yesterday. The touch bar is pretty neat. Those who dismiss it should really look into it. I played with iMovie and using the bar to scrub and the tools is inventive.
Don't knock this one quite yet. Plus I added every filter I could on a HD movie clip (multi gigabyte file) and it never studdered and rolled along without a hitch. The 15" model is pretty powerful with 16gb of ram but base level processor. Very impressive.
Can you delete portions of events to free up storage space in iMovie?I got to play with one yesterday. The touch bar is pretty neat. Those who dismiss it should really look into it. I played with iMovie and using the bar to scrub and the tools is inventive.
Don't knock this one quite yet. Plus I added every filter I could on a HD movie clip (multi gigabyte file) and it never studdered and rolled along without a hitch. The 15" model is pretty powerful with 16gb of ram but base level processor. Very impressive.
Deny a prisoner water long enough, and he'll eventually drink anything.
Title is misleading. Those are not 'all' competing laptops. It's just a few of them cherry picked to create a chart. The MBP and MB columns are based on an estimate because Apple doesn't reveal break down figures.
Yeah, anything... apart from Microsoft Surface Book, ASUS Chromebook Flip, Dell Inspiron 2-in-1, and Lenovo Yoga 900.
[doublepost=1478767485][/doublepost]
You haven't read the article or stopped to think.
They don't need Apple's figures, because they have the actual number of units purchased by their pool of clients.
You do realise it's "revenue" ......see prices of new MacBook pros. Very important ....one MacBook Pro sold for £1000000000000000 supports their analysis .... we on mac rumours are more interested if people are buying these and not how much revenue comes in.
Second they have a small pool of clients .... I'm sure other research companies have different results, so can I ask why this company figures are correct or can we agree that it's just thier view.
Of course you need apple's figures ... do you judge the success of a new product based on how many harrods sells??
You need more data on which retailers are part of this analysis .
The previous gen MBP is already powerful enough for almost all users. But most people want new stuff.Deny a prisoner water long enough, and he'll eventually drink anything.
The "MacBook Pro" is treated as a single product rather than the group of products it is. Meanwhile, the competitors have hundreds of different models competing, many of which from the same brand.
Of course it will outsell the others when the breakdown is as such.
For example, there is the surface book. But where is the Surface pro? Where is the Surface? Where is the Surface Studio?
What about ASus'sother laptops? What about Dell's other laptops. The XPS series? Lattitude? etc?
According to Slice Intelligence it keeps track of 4.4M online shoppers. Of those 16,754 brought one of those laptops mentioned in the graph.Note that this "statistic" seems to be based on a pool of about 13,000 online shoppers and there is no indication of how many total units were sold of each model. So, the actual number of MacBooks sold could be quite low. It could be that out of those 13K shoppers only 1000 bought a new MacBook Pro, 2000+ bought a MacBook, while a few hundred other people bought one of the other brands. However, there could be nearly 10,000 shoppers who purchased something else (in fact, that is somewhat likely). Thus, this tells you nothing about the total number of MacBook Pros that have been sold during this time period.