Lots of sheep out there
Am I the only one who sees the irony of everyone mocking the conformity of Apple customers by using the same insult for like the last 10 years?
Easiest response: better a sheep than a parrot.
Last edited:
Lots of sheep out there
And if you do... MAKE SURE NO BODY is around the power cable - if they are, your brand new shiny thin TouchBook Pro WILL bite the dust when it accelerates towards the concrete ground !
Deny a prisoner water long enough, and he'll eventually drink anything.
It's frustrating. Just goes to show people will lap up anything if you stick an Apple on it!
its a VERY tricky difference that people need to understand. This news is ONLY Revenue. has absolutely nothing to do with actual number of units.
And since the base unit price also went up, and there's pent up demand, higher revenues themselvse should be expected up front. However, Higher revenues doesn't impact the industry in any way. Good revenues are great for Apple but don't generally affect market share or use cases in the industry.
It's like the iPhone. Shrinking Market share, yet the biggest profit maker in the industry. Thats good for Apple. But again, completely irrelevant to the industry itself.
There are so many people who have been waiting years to upgrade (and wish to stay with Apple... for now), it is hardly surprising.
Well, these buyers obviously aren't PRO
So true. As company, there is nothing better than increase in revenue.
I've said it before: I think these are priced too highly and Apple is taking advantage of the pent up demand. They've done it before with the iMac retina. It feels disrespectful. But it seems we're willing to take the abuse. :/
NOTHING you can't do with an late 2015 MacBook Pro that you could do with a 2016 Late MBP. As a matter of fact you can do MORE with the late 2015 as you can connect MORE devices....
Given the high volumes, do they need to be?Well, these buyers obviously aren't PRO
Lots of sheep out there
its a VERY tricky difference that people need to understand. This news is ONLY Revenue. has absolutely nothing to do with actual number of units.
Sincerely sorry about that but, man, does that ever make me feel old not being able to identify what was, in fact, obvious sarcasm as evidenced by the /s (I actually am aware of that and was being reactionary). Thanks for your patience.sorry, i was joking..
the little '/s' tag at the bottom of the post is meant to indicate 'sarcasm font'
macs are an integral part of my productions (design/fabrication) and i think these 2016mbps are sweet.
This really shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. Say what you want in the debate about the 2016 MacBook Pro not being a device for "professionals," but it's got features that people want. Apple's goal is not to cater to a small niche of users who demand 32GB of RAM or legacy ports, but to capture market share in the notebook computer segment. What the average consumer wants today is a lightweight device with efficient processors, and the preorder numbers speak for themselves.
Why don't they do total sales of other laptops vs the macbooks? With windows pcs you have choice.
Sales numbers would have been through the roof and into the "space" had they priced it just about $400 less.![]()
Well, these buyers obviously aren't PRO
But as a consumer, it's not so clear cut.
I want the company I buy from to have good revenues. And a healthy profit. This ensures me that the company isn't gonig anywhere soon, and should continue to support, and update my device. There's nothing wrong with people who buy apple because of this reasoning.
What I have problem with is rampant profiteering. "40% profits margin? LETS DO 50%!" while taking home 200 million in bonuses, while cutting costs at the bottom end (restructuring of their store staff so that promotions are less and its generaly lower pay, using foreign labour, internationally suspectible human rights, etc etc etc), and then turning around and boasting how profitable they are, while also raising prices 20-30%.
to me, thats bordering on unethical. But, hey, as long as enough people are fine with paying the Apple tax, they'll continue doing it.
I don't want to know that my money is going directly to the pockets of a dozen disconnected rich wallstreet snobs. I want MY purchase power and money to go back into the company itself to grow it and help pay living wages for all employees. Profit is not meant to be stockpiled so that a few people can make themselves richer. it's meant to be re-invested so that the economy continues to circulate.
Sales numbers would have been through the roof and into the "space" had they priced it just about $400 less.![]()
Its clear reading some comments that some people really have a limited definition of Pro.
Apple is doomed, doooomed I tell you!What a failure of a product. Tim Cook's apple is a sinking ship.