It might not get USB 3.
Apple already lost me on laptops. If they don't have USB 3 by the time my 2006 iMac dies, then I will be finished with them.
May as well leave now. If USB 3 is ever in a Mac, it will only be because Lightpeak failed.
It might not get USB 3.
Apple already lost me on laptops. If they don't have USB 3 by the time my 2006 iMac dies, then I will be finished with them.
the way this will work is there will be an 8-16gb ssd that os x runs on, Apple won't tell us how much it is, just that the OS runs on it. it wont be configurable, under the laptop specs it won't mention that at all it would just show how much the regular drive is. Apple will try make it not a big deal at all and in theory the consumer won't even know os x is on another drive, they will just notice the increase in performance.
users will get to select how big there main drive is, 320, 500, etc. or they could select a 256 or 512gb ssd as their main drive.
the 8-16gb ssd that OSX is on will be like the 8gb ssd the apple tv has, in other words apple will pretend it doesn't exist
What? Fry your motherboard? What pipe have you been smoking? I would say serious designers probly want a SSD to speed things up. Someone please prove me wrong.
But you can buy something off of iTunes and upload it on up to 3 other computers am I right? So say I do that, to my family, and then they burn a copy of what's rightfully theirs? Huh? With iTunes you can make copy's but not with a CD? There isn't a Yes/No answer to this situation...it's complicated.
Even if there so much evidence this won't happen, admit it... your hoping that it's true.
Is this deal speaking of new macs or the most recent models?
-Paul
What I am hoping is:
1. Remove optical drive.
2. Build-in 256GB SSD.
3. Keep the internal HDD bay, PRO users can throw in any HD they like.
This is my wish and I think this is the only logic way to keep MacBook Pro respected.![]()
What I am hoping is:
1. Remove optical drive.
2. Build-in 256GB SSD.
3. Keep the internal HDD bay, PRO users can throw in any HD they like.
This is my wish and I think this is the only logic way to keep MacBook Pro respected.![]()
I don't see the problem. Get the smallest HD option, take it out and replace it with sandforce. The 16GB won't hurt you - you wouldn't have to use it(unless it's locked into the caching mode some people have suggested).
Unless the os is installed on it and there is no option to install it on the regular ssd instead...![]()
OS X generally permits you to install the OS on and boot from any drive you'd like. Plus I'm sure any SSD would be socketed and could be removed.
Yeah, just like MP4's were supposed to wipe out MP3's, right?
I don't understand how people don't use these more often.
I make a lot of copies of CD's for my family (why have my 2 brothers buy an album each when I can and burn 2 copies for them?) and watch a lot of Dvd's on the go.
So from that article it's saying there won't be a drive for Cd's/Dvd's?
(I can't really tell because I'm not great with all the SSD/HDD/etc. lingo)
Honestly I don't see any reason why couple of insults and offensive behaviour from some people should start a flamewar. If you don't like macs, or you are not fans of apple or not expecting MBP 2011...why in god's name have you come here in the first place? This is something I will never get. This site is called MACrumors... now grow up...and if you have nothing to add to this discussion close to the topic...then simply don't.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
With Toshiba's new 1.8" 250gb drive and a
SSD drive for osx to boot from could
this not be a speed / weight advantage
Apple has be looking for?
What makes you so sure it will be removable or that it's use will not be integral part of efi and how the mbp works?
Because Apple's engineers aren't that lame. If they do it, it will be a socketed blade, just like in the MBA. And they'd likely take advantage of OS X capabilities that already exist rather than spending a lot of engineering time to make things worse.
All good... but removing the optical drive would be really bad. I would not buy a MBP without an optical drive... I think.![]()
If they are doing something like how the Momentus works, they would use their own chip to interface to SATA and use only one port. The chip would add its own port to talk to the HD. This would allow the chip to intercept the SATA commands/data and make it look to the system as if there is a single disk.
The diff is that they can make sure in the mba that your only drive is an ssd but in the regular laptops it would make sense from a uniformity point of view to provide all with a cheap 8-16gb flash and regular plater drives probably at 750 or 1tb that way they can bull... the consumers with the amazing boot speed and large storage they have, and for the average joe it will be true.
If one chip is talking to 2 different DD and the CPU through 1 Sata port channel, would this serve to negate the speed advantage of using a SDD? i.e. would the chip become the bottleneck?