The question is: what consumers really want?
...it doesn't just randomly shutoff like my dell lattitude.
The laptop she bought has a resolution of 1440x900. Apple does a screen of this resolution. They call it a 15". Apple's 17 has a resolution of 1920 x 1200.
Yes PCs are cheaper, but low end PCs are not comparable to Macs. See what you get for £1199
15" Mac Book
2Gb Ram
250Gb HDD
2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
256Mb VRAM
Gigabit Ethernet
Firewire 800
USB 2
2.4kg
Mini Display port for additional monitor
I prices up a Dell system with as closer spec as I could, and this was $959. This was not Firewire 800 and it was only VGA, not mini display port which can drive monitors up to 2560x1600 (30"). The Dell weighs 2.9Kg, which is only .5kg more but it is made of cheap looking plastic, compared with Apples Aluminium.
You also get Virus free computing and the best build quality of any PC. You cannot compare low end PCs with Macs. That would be like comparing a hand made hard wood table with a factory made MDF table. Not the same at all.
The question is: what consumers really want?
Microsoft would like to reduce the "buying" equation to purchase cost; the implication being that truly in all things, the systems are equal.
MS would do themselves a great favor to "retire" Balmer.
Firewire and Blue ray to really beat the **** out of the horse we have been flogging for past year.....
An advertisement telling people what they already know is generally seen as calling the public idiots.
Maybe thats why they are aluminum now. Just a thought...
Poor people shouldn't be able to afford Apple computers. They don't understand, nor can they appreciate, cool things like thin hardware and hip operating systems. Peecees and Winblows is for them. They smell too.
I cant afford a Mac, but Ive been saving up for almost a year to buy one. Does that mean I dont deserve one? Its just people that dont care enough about good computers to spend the money...
if you want a 17" screen for cheap. go for an HP. great - you can see the blue screen of death on a bigger screen than a MacBook for the same price.
if you want a 17" screen for cheap. go for an HP. great - you can see the blue screen of death on a bigger screen than a MacBook for the same price
. . .
in my opinion - MacBooks are better than a comparable HP laptop. but that's only for ME
Your opinion is a sadly misinformed opinion. The BSOD hasn't been around since XP and Windows 7 is remarkable stable for a Microsoft product. This sort of reactionary windows bashing only makes us, as a community, look vapid and small.
Your opinion is a sadly misinformed opinion. The BSOD hasn't been around since XP and Windows 7 is remarkably stable for a Microsoft product. This sort of reactionary windows bashing only makes us, as a community, look vapid and small.
BSODs and Kernel Panics haven't been an issue with modern operating systems for quite a while...
You're both wrong. Who says the BSOD isn't still in Windows? It is! Kernal Panics still happen to Macs, both are just unlikely.
ssshhhhh...... keep that on the low.... lots of people here have not used a M$ product for many years, and they think that vista is utter crap cause Apple Advertising says so (see it works!). Image the shock and horror if they loaded vista on a system right now to discover it is very stable.... and do not even mention that the current MBPs suffer from Black Screens Of Death due to cooling issues... Cannot remember the last M$ BSOD i had, I do get constant Apple BSOD cause I game on my MBP.
BSODs and Kernel Panics haven't been an issue with modern operating systems for quite a while...
Your opinion is a sadly misinformed opinion. The BSOD hasn't been around since XP and Windows 7 is remarkably stable for a Microsoft product. This sort of reactionary windows bashing only makes us, as a community, look vapid and small.
Actually it is possible to BSOD Win7; happened to me last week, but I think it was due to a failed drive I was hooking up via SATA-->USB converter attempting to recover data. It did actually BSOD.
But Win7 is still in beta, so quirks here and there are expected. It's otherwise been very stable, especially for a beta.
Stupid marketing bastards! Let them buy their windows computers, they look like crap and the run like crap.
Both "never crashes" and "constantly crashes" are false for both OSs. Crash rates are low for both, but not zero.
Love mac but you do one gates bailed out jobs right plus any jobs has add anothe 1-2 zeros after it. Seriously, I doubt gates cares. After years of inseure ads from apple, you can't take it huh? In a biokni read about bad bosses, jobs fit every top ten things to watch for ie making fun of competition.
Persnsllynsine all thea a are mobile chips plus it's $2000 to get into a
Machine with graphics, I have 2 MacBooks pros and a hack,plus mini crap update, no FireWire on MacBook, no dedicated gpu, lame mini update, overprice ram, graphic card and mac pro, plus years of stretching trut of benchmarks with ppc, and x86 saved them, add I thisn50 million iPhone contracts about to expire ( apple only cares about iPhone iPod anyway), plus one to one trainging used to be high end fcp, shake, motion but is now barking digs, crying babies and how to do email attachment, not to mention 1 to 1 trainers are clueles about pro apps, I hope apple fails and that win 7 is great, jobs apes down and we can start to see more powerful machines from apple. Having all this with palm pree soon is excelent timing. Looks LIKE APPLE MAY HAVE TO REAP ALL THEY HAVE SOWN FIR THE PAST FEW YEARS.
Karma time? Plus everyone makes fun of msft and programs yet apple tries one non apple thing, push and realizes how hard it is and still doesn't work. Amazing. Lol.
Vista SP1 is stable, it's just slow as molasses compared to XP and Win7. And please don't use absolutes like "current MBPs suffer from Black Screens Of Death due to cooling issues" because they do not all suffer from this. Mine certainly doesn't, neither do any of the others in my company, and we hammer them with 3D rendering just as hard as a game would.