Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That is one real sick and inaccurate analogy.
If we stick to the common mythology, God does not need to spy as He knows everything. Which really makes me wonder why the question "Did you eat the fruit?" was even asked.
 
This will have huuuge impact on a lot of areas. Drain the swamp.

And blame the Russians! /rofl

View attachment 691360

1482015790142973120.jpg
 
Man, this is going to make the internet one unsafe place to chill out in with all these exploits out there for people to use.
On the other hand, it allows the companies that make the affected devices to fix the exploited vulnerabilities. IMO the intelligence agencies should be much more proactive in sharing their exploits with the industry. It would make us all safer. In fact, Obama instructed them to do so, but left some loopholes.
 
Drain the CIA
[doublepost=1488907147][/doublepost]
No one has ever disputed the authenticity of the data no matter how it was obtained. Stay awake.

That's because the agencies in question don't comment at all. You seem to think this is an admission of authenticity, but it's not.

Wikileaks is a Russian influence operation. An HOUR after Trump's Access Hollywood tape came out, they started dumping Podesta's emails, which they held in reserve to serve as a distraction when they needed them.
 
Last edited:
That's because the agencies in question don't comment at all. You seem to think this is an admission of authenticity, but it's not.

Wikileaks is a Russian influence operation. An HOUR after Trump's Access Hollywood tape came out, they started dumping Podesta's emails, which they held in reserve to serve as a distraction when they needed them. Anyone who doesn't understand this is a complete idiot.
....are you asserting that Wikileaks has always been a "russian influence operation"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: aylk
That's because the agencies in question don't comment at all. You seem to think this is an admission of authenticity, but it's not.

Wikileaks is a Russian influence operation. An HOUR after Trump's Access Hollywood tape came out, they started dumping Podesta's emails, which they held in reserve to serve as a distraction when they needed them. Anyone who doesn't understand this is a complete idiot.

Of course it's the Russians. Who else could it be?? :D
 
....Gather round folks, we have a clear example of a person whom has never bothered to actually go through Wikileaks website! Your post is 100% nonsense. Go to their site, use some of the filtering tools.
[doublepost=1488908034][/doublepost]
Our information sharing agreements with the GCHQ (spelling?) and others make that a law without teeth. We routinely use our allies spying capabilities in our country to hand over information on Americans.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/11/nsa-americans-personal-data-israel-documents
What does that have to do with US developed tools as per this article? If the CIA gives Israel the tools and that tool is used on US Citizens, then the CIA has an issue. Now if Israel developes their own tool, well that is just the world we live in.
 
What does that have to do with US developed tools as per this article? If the CIA gives Israel the tools and that tool is used on US Citizens, then the CIA has an issue. Now if Israel developes their own tool, well that is just the world we live in.
No, they don't have an issue, because we've signed intelligence sharing agreements with just about every ally we have. So if the CIA wants to spy on Johnny Arkansas, you only need to suggest to ally X or Y that they may want to look into him, and then ask them to share the data.

What I'm saying is our own (secret) treaties have rendered the laws on spying on US citizens laughably moot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jkcerda
....are you asserting that Wikileaks has always been a "russian influence operation"?

No, but after the Collateral Murder tape, I think Julian decided he'd like to bring down the US, found common cause with the Russians. There was a large exodus of original Wikileaks staff around then when it became the Julian Assange egomaniac show. The DNC leaks were all by Russian hackers. Odd how he never pushes anything negative against Putin, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: damacus
I find Wikileaks timing of this all too convenient. They've released this to take the heat off of the Russian investigations.

Its just a another diversion for Trump.

It amazes me people still push unfounded theories about Trump. It seems like the way politicians are covering themselves is by pushing narratives that accuse their opponents of what they in FACT have done. It gets picked up and repeated all over the place organically as well as through paid social media campaigns. A lot of what you read has been generated by zombie/drone/bot accounts.
And this is why any time someone starts talking about a huge, far-reaching conspiracy, I kinda have to laugh. I don't think we have a single large organization on earth that's tight enough to hide anything big. Even the freaking intelligence community is subject to major leaks of this nature at least once a year.

Don't conflate (erroneously associate) the term covert with the term conspiracy. The failure to remain covert does not nullify the conspiracy.
 
So now can we all admit it wasn't the Russians?

Wikileaks is a primarily an influence by the Russians now. Assange regularly meets with RT (Russia Today- state owned television). Notice how he never posts anything bad about Putin, despite Putin murdering journalists, invading Crimea, etc?
 
Last edited:
No, but after the Collateral Murder tape, I think Julian decided he'd like to bring down the US, found common cause with the Russians. There was a large exodus of original Wikileaks staff around then when it became the Julian Assange egomaniac show. The DNC leaks were all by Russian hackers. Odd how he never pushes anything negative against Putin, right?
I think the USA's explicit empire needs to be taken down (not that the country should be harmed, simply that US Hegemony is a sick worldview), so what's the problem? The DNC leaks...were leaks from a DNC staffer as a former british ambassador involved in handing the information off had stated.

As for the underlined, I'll ask you again to actually visit their goddamn website. There is a category on Russia's dealings. If you're only understanding of Wikileaks is when US news actually decides to cover some of their exposures then I can see how you'd get that impression. Wikileaks is hosting leaks from dozens of countries, Russia included, which you can easily find by just going to the damn website.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.