While I think that your particular use case would be nice for you. I am picturing my iPad sitting on my MagSafe charger like my iPhone does and that just seems unwieldy. I think the MagSafe from the new MBP's make more sense, but even then I'd rather them not do that as I prefer the USB-C charging.I think that, assuming it doesn't come at the cost of anything else (e.g., durability), it'd be a nice feature to have!
I'm working to integrate wireless charging pucks/mats integrated into furniture and I can see a future where I have a coffee table and desk with a charger built in and I can just set my iPad down on the table/desk when done and not have to worry about plugging it in.
Anytime I can reduce the number of wires strewn about (by hiding them in a table/desk, for example), I'm on board!
Yeah, I’m not joking 🙃!Maybe a better idea would be to learn to hunt and forage and live off the land. Money will do you know good in an apocalyptic future!![]()
Well, the losses will be significant, much more so than a phone.Not a big fan of wireless charging but I guess it will be a great addition and a selling point. Even with faster and improved wireless charging. Can you imagine how long it's going to take to charge the battery? Especially wireless charging with the teeny tiny Apple logo.
Yea, from Apple: $249, 3rd party: 199A charging puck on the back while it's sitting face up does seem awkward. Maybe someone will integrate WC into a desktop kick-back stand?
Then don't use the wireless charging. The wireless charging thing really is a "if nothing else is sacrificed for the feature -- why not?" -- I think it's safe to assume that it'll be like current iPhones and you'll still have a charging port to use, especially since USB-C on the iPad Pro is a pretty big sell for professionals who have a lot of peripherals (and folks who use those HDMI adapters to hook up to a TV/monitor).While I think that your particular use case would be nice for you. I am picturing my iPad sitting on my MagSafe charger like my iPhone does and that just seems unwieldy. I think the MagSafe from the new MBP's make more sense, but even then I'd rather them not do that as I prefer the USB-C charging.
Also, sup bestie?
It's exactly the point of the articleWhy not make the Apple logo glass and use that as the wireless charging area? Why the entire back?
It’s not. You sacrifice thickness and weight.Then don't use the wireless charging. The wireless charging thing really is a "if nothing else is sacrificed for the feature -- why not?" -- I think it's safe to assume that it'll be like current iPhones and you'll still have a charging port to use, especially since USB-C on the iPad Pro is a pretty big sell for professionals who have a lot of peripherals (and folks who use those HDMI adapters to hook up to a TV/monitor).
Many hugs, friend
How thin and light do we need to be? We already went through losing ports for the sake of being thin. They are all incredibly thin and light, is anyone really struggling with any modern MacBook? I having no issue at all with the latest MacBook Pros being thicker then previous, it is a better balance of form and function rather then just all about form. Apple was great for this, having the 2 married so well. After Steve Jobs it started tilting towards form over function.It’s not. You sacrifice thickness and weight.
I feel like that remains to be seen, though, right? Totally feasible that Apple's miniaturized and re-arranged some things to get the wireless charging in there without adding thickness (maybe weight, but the few grams it'd likely add isn't a huge deal to me)It’s not. You sacrifice thickness and weight.
It’s not about how thin and light. It’s about what those extra thickness and weight can be used for. Opportunity costs/trade-offs. Nothing is free.How thin and light do we need to be? We already went through losing ports for the sake of being thin. They are all incredibly thin and light, is anyone really struggling with any modern MacBook? I having no issue at all with the latest MacBook Pros being thicker then previous, it is a better balance of form and function rather then just all about form. Apple was great for this, having the 2 married so well. After Steve Jobs it started tilting towards form over function.
Yes, and I believe we have gotten to a point with today's technology that we don't need things thinner or lighter, when they do we lose things so we enter form over function. I would say we lose nothing where we are now with the all the ports. Bonus would be the ability to upgrade/change the ram, hard drive and battery like you could in days of old. Of course we would not want the Apple users to have to many options to actually upgrade and steal money from Apple.It’s not about how thin and light. It’s about what those extra thickness and weight can be used for. Opportunity costs/trade-offs. Nothing is free.
Also, the new MBPs are not much thicker. Just significantly less aggressive tapering at the edges.
Technically, something was lost - the flexibility of a USB-C port. Apple basically took one of the USB-C buses and tore it apart to only accept HDMI and SD card.Yes, and I believe we have gotten to a point with today's technology that we don't need things thinner or lighter, when they do we lose things so we enter form over function. I would say we lose nothing where we are now with the all the ports. Bonus would be the ability to upgrade/change the ram, hard drive and battery like you could in days of old. Of course we would not want the Apple users to have to many options to actually upgrade and steal money from Apple.