Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
if the rumors are right:

The next iPhone is not a revolution....
the next iPhone is a new world !!!!

- higher display resolution
- front camera
- Improved back camera
- flash
- multitasking (the hole iPhone OS4)
- file sharing
- "wigets" (new iPod controls)
- Improved processor
- Improved battery
- Improved noise cancellation
- Video HD
- ...
- ...
- ...

ohhh boyyyy....

*Orgasm*
 
HD Recording? NO! I hope Apple will not implement this. I can't imagine the quality to be any good at all.

Its even ok if it is vga quality at 1280x720 just NOT vga quality cropped up. PLUS its you against a billion and apple with the bigger lense it will look beautiful plus it's more flush the design i'll be upgrading from the 3G
 
Yeah, it figures they would do this. I just bought a Canon still camera that can shoot 720p. That is money I could have spent on a new iPhone that would always be in my pocket anyway.

Thanks a lot Apple. Why do you always have to be so freaking awesome? Huh? HUH?
 
Its probably gonna be 960x640 recorded video

960x640 rumored to be next iPhone resolution
iFrame HD format released by Apple which is 960x640
iMovie codec support for iFrame for editing

Connect the dots

How ever that wouldn't explain the snippet of code found in the OS 4.0 beta that says "AVCapture 720x1280" and "AVCapture 640x480".
Expect to be given the choice between HD and SD capturing in the new iPhone.
 
So which side will have the 5 MP camera? Front, back, or both? Maybe one side is 5 MP, and the other one is a surprise to us?
 
Yeah, it figures they would do this. I just bought a Canon still camera that can shoot 720p. That is money I could have spent on a new iPhone that would always be in my pocket anyway.

Except I bet the footage shot on the Canon would look much, much better.
 
So please don't worry about how many megapixels it has. Anything over 5 is more than acceptable, especially with such a tiny lens and sensor.

I hear ya... It rolls me how everyone just looks at the numbers for photo sensors, processors, etc., and not how well they perform.

It just seems to be a race to cram as many MPs into a camera sensor as you can. More MPs to, the average Joe, only gives you more zooming/cropping wiggle room. As the average Joe is still going to print it out at 300dpi, or display it at 72dpi. Magazine publishers print at a higher dpi, so they tend to use medium format gear (read, much higher MPs.)

My Nikon D300/D700 does me just fine at 12MBs (and even that is MORE than enough.) Heck, my old Canon D-Rebel took/printed some great photos, and it only had a 6MP sensor.

It all comes down to optics and sensor quality.

Just my 2¢
 
I hope this new iPhone will record 720p/24fps, because if it only records 30fps or 29.97fps then the resulting video would not play on the current AppleTV. I would, of course, forgive them if they would just upgrade the AppleTV!
 
I'm going to predict that the next iPhone will have an image stabilizing feature.
 
One can argue about the megapixels to death but look at the quality of the Nokia N8 photos & they're very sharp & noise free & as good as many P&S cameras.

You are right, and one can argue about the professional or sudo professional equipment used to film that video..... Not saying the video wasn't clean, but there was more equipment used then just the phone.
 
This isn't accurate. A 5 megapixel camera, it's possible to capture high resolution IMAGES, but not necessarily VIDEO at that high a rez. And that is likely a limitation of the camera component.

Similarly, the current iPhone can capture 3 megapixel images but video only at 640x480.

arn

Not to be a huge co-signer, but yes, it is a limitation on the camera component. There is still a computer in there churning through all of that information, and taking 24-30 photos a second at more than 1280x720 and converting it into a certain format, etc, etc, take a lot of processing power.

Not that those small devices can't handle it, just that it will take it's toll on battery life, heat of the device, internal memory, etc. There's a reason some pay top dollar for full HD cams, and RED charges pro dollar for 4K.
 
Cool, now you don't need to get a flip camcorder.

Full HD in your pocket. Priceless...:D
Resolution ≠ Quality. My P&S camera takes video in 640x480, but it still looks better than the video taken by a flip mino with 1280x720. And while the iPhone 3GS has the same resolution as my camera, my camera's video looks dramatically better. What I'm trying to say is, you might get better results with a Flip mino anyway.
And also 720p isn't Full HD, 1080p is Full HD. But then again one could say 1080p isn't full HD either because there are cameras that take videos at resolution up to 4096 X 2304 (see, RED.com).
You are going to need a pile of memory to support HD recording. Low Quality HD (5Mbps) takes about 2~3 GB per hour. High quality (24Mbps) takes about 11 GB per hour.

Also, without image stabilization, the resulting video is horrible (the defects are plainly visible in HD formats). The resolution of the camera at 5 megapixels is adequate for limited digital stabilization, or limited digital zooming, but not both.

That said, it might be adequate for a quick snippit.
That's the point. I don't think this is intended to make full movies or something professional, it's if you don't have your camera with you, or are willing to sacrifice quality for file size.
to 2003 Iphone, we were waiting for you
Phones that had video recording in 2003 took videos in a really low resolution (like 120x90 or less) with a frame rate of like 3-7fps. Almost no one had consumer HD camcorders (there were hardly any, and the ones that were available were really expensive).
And if you are talking about video recording in general, well iPhones had that since June 2009.
 
Phones that had video recording in 2003 took videos in a really low resolution (like 120x90 or less) with a frame rate of like 3-7fps. Almost no one had consumer HD camcorders (there were hardly any, and the ones that were available were really expensive).
And if you are talking about video recording in general, well iPhones had that since June 2009.

Digital camera VGA (640×480) resolution (Most models)
 
How ever that wouldn't explain the snippet of code found in the OS 4.0 beta that says "AVCapture 720x1280" and "AVCapture 640x480".
Expect to be given the choice between HD and SD capturing in the new iPhone.

My guess is that the front-facing camera will be limited to captururing it at 640X480 and the back will capture at 1280X720.
 
HD Recording? NO! I hope Apple will not implement this. I can't imagine the quality to be any good at all.

-NOT.

With the expected resolution of the new iPhone at 5 megapixels it will be just fine. If their are any doubts about 5mp being any good, it is just about the same as a 35mm camera.
 
People are still going on about this megapixel nonsense. The number doesn't really matter all that much when we're talking about 5 vs lets say 8. Who saw the comparison that came out today with the Nexus beating the Droid Incredible camera in quality and being 3 megapixels less.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.