plastique45 said:
"What exists: Low power G5s." Yes, the 970fx. We have those in the iMac already, not cool enough to run in a PowerBook. As for the 1.4 & 1.6GHz chips supposedly cool enough to run in laptops, although IBM announced them, none are availabl eto purchase by vendors (and they probably won't be for QUITE some time).
I definitely do agree with you on that. Especially with no supply guarantee agreement from IBM
plastique45 said:
"Dual Core G4s" Nope. Projected chip by Motorola. Not yet released (will it ever be? Motorola/Freescale NEVER respected ANY of their projections).
I disagree, in part. There are dual core G4s. the MPC7448 has already been demonstrated, since February. The EEMBC has been benchmarking them. I think they will be ready for mass production by October but itll probably be too late to see them in the PBs. As Yonah will probably hit the PBs next year
plastique45 said:
"Dual Core 3+GHz PPCs for Microsoft" These PPC's are not Desktop compatible and they are not yet available. To make Them PowerMac compatible would mean making them more complex which means less speed and more heat i.e our current 970.
I also agree, in part. The PPC chips made for the Xbox 360 (a PC based game consol), still opperate on RISC instruction, yet a form of the Windows OS runs on them. Also, Microsoft already has a supply of those chips for their Xbox 360 release, slatted for this Holiday Season 2005. Unless Billy Boy decides to cancel at the last minute... So, Id assume the chips are already available or else they wouldnt be able to establish an inventory for the Winter release.
(side tracked)
Wait... it totally didn't click before... Windows running on a PPC?!

I'm getting a glimpse of the future... Windows Vista update pack 2000 PowerPC native... Windows becomes more Mac-like... Mac on Intel... worms worms and more worms... scary thought...
plastique45 said:
"3+GHz PPCs for Sony". Nope, this is not a PPC in the classic sense, the cell is a brand new type of PPC cousin. It was tested by Apple before they decided to switch to Intel. The cell is not practical for desktop applications and it is slower thanthe current G5 at such applications.
Yes, very true.
I still think it would be nice if some of these great PPC innovations were equated to Mac Computers, like they used to be. Thats all. Great PPC products in the pipeline but not for Apple.

Its clear that Motorola/Freescale are more interested in the embedded chip market, and IMB
(Edit: oops, IBM) is interested in catering to and making chips for game consoles, supercomputers, military etc. Im a huge fan of the RISC architecture, Im sorry to see Apple forced off the very architecture they helped develop. **sigh**