Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would literally own an iMac 24 right now, if not for waiting on this refresh (and not being in a hurry, I have no reason to rush).

I would get the 2.93, and pay for the HD 4850 upgrade, and pay 2K flat because I want to get locked in on better graphics. I would prefer to get the 2.66 and the 4850... that would put me at a 100-150 bucks less if such a thing existed, give or take.

So, I would *like* to pay about $1750 for an iMac, the only question is what am I going to get for that here in a while....

Scenario 1 - No Changes for Several Months and Scenario 2 - Minor Refresh or Price Drop

The simplest scenario to describe is just that nothing happens or they just lower the price, or bump the Ghz, HD, Ram, etc. Perhaps, the inventory shortage is illusory, Apple is not ready to change the models, they are waiting on 32nm chips next year, or just plain feel they can wait it out, that the models are attractive enough. Maybe they have something grand, but its not working out for now.

The likelihood of me buying here is low. I would probably just sit on my money and be disappointed, but would have to just deal. Given all the movement to new hardware and Windows 7 in the PC consumer space, this option would not be a particularly strong marketing effort for Apple.

Scenario 3 - Core i7 Mobile

This seems the most likely with the timing. If the inventory lull is real and there is a fall refresh like their normal schedule would suggest, this would be the current state of the art mobile chip, and iMac's are built around a mobile platform.

The likelihood of me buying here is pretty good, although it is going to feel *weird* having a chip that can clock down as low as 1.7GHz. Sure, a great deal of the time, its going to be closer to 3, but to buy a machine in 2009, I expect to use in 2012, that can go down so low is, rationally or not, disconcerting. T

It's all bout GCD in the future for this chip imo... the uptick of being able to run 8 logical cores, is that if GCD becomes pervasiv and it's running at truly 8 threads across 1.7Ghz all the time, that's actually pretty kick ass, and the parallelism makes up for the clock speed.

Scenario 4 - Something More Out There (Core 2 Quad, Lynnfield)


In this scenario, Apple goes a different route than mobile, and sticks a desktop processor in there. Maybe they make the shell thicker, maybe the get better cooling, maybe they just pull an Apple and make it happen. Core Quads would be OK, but the power on them seems just too far out there. Lynnfields are more modern, and more likely to make work. Maybe the P55 chipset + Lynnfield can be made to fit and have the temperature controlled.

Likelihood of me buying a Lynnfield iMac is ridiculously high, that would be amazing. Cure 2 Quad would probably be a yes too, but I think that's probably a stretch, and would be less exciting. I would probably be happier about a Core Quad than a i7 Mobile, but I think its moot.

Scenario 5 - Return of the Consumer Tower

Apple throws a consumer tower into the mix. This would almost 100% be a Lynnfield, and would allow me to use my current monitor and etc to get $1750 worth of ass kickery. I don't see anyone suggesting this is coming back, but this would be a very strong "buy" for me, even though I love the look of the AIO.

Sorry for the long winded musings, just trying to talk myself through where this may be going...
 
Historical trends on releases

The following information is relevant to 15' Macbook Pro's and their release dates, but I believe it does give clues to when we can expect and changes.

ps I also have some processor price comparisons noted below

2006
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T7400) 2.16ghz 667 Mhz BS Oct. 24, 2006 Original price $1,999
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T7600) 2.33ghz 667 Mhz BS Oct. 24, 2006 Original price $2,499
2007
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T7500) 2.2 ghz 800 Mhz BS Jun 5, 2007 Original price $1,999
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T7700) 2.4 ghz 800 Mhz BS Jun 5, 2007 Original price $2,499
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T7700) 2.6 ghz 800 Mhz BS Nov 1 2007 Original price $2,749
2008
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (PB8600) 2.4 ghz 1066 Mhz BS Oct. 14. 2008 Original price $1,999
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T9400) 2.53ghz 1066 Mhz BS Oct. 14, 2008 Original price $2,499
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T9400) 2.8 ghz 1066 Mhz BS Oct. 14, 2008 Original price $2,799
2009
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T9550) 2.66ghz 1066 Mhz BS Jan. 6 2009 Original price $2,499
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (P8800) 2.66ghz 1066 Mhz BS June 8, 2009 Original price $1,999 current
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (T9600) 2.8 ghz 1066 Mhz BS June 8, 2009 Original price $2,299 current
Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (P8700) 2.53ghz 1066 Mhz BS June 8, 2009 Original price $1,699 current


Current price of a 2.8 ghz T9600 $316.00 Launched Q3-08
Current price of a Core i7-720QM (6M Cache, 1.60 GHz) $364.00 Launched Q3-09
 
I also would love a bigger screen on the iMac.

But one thing I think they need is a bigger HD. Apple is pushing all things digital i.e. HD TV shows which average 30 gigs a season! That will get eaten up pretty quick if you Dl a few shows each yr. plus factor lossless music and HD movies etc.

I'm just getting fed up using external hard drives.

would also be nice if they gave a Solid State option for custom builds.
 
Everything on the UK Apple store site still ships within 24hrs....

Has done for ages - never changed.

So hope it something is announced soon. Held off for quite a while now for a 24" iMac. Would get one regardless of whatever the bump up is - would just like to make sure what it is.

Would kill for an iMac that looked just like the new cinema display (chin or no chin!).
 
I also would love a bigger screen on the iMac.
When the monitor is so bound to the computer, you cannot put a 1000$ panel inside. A 500$ 24" IPS panel is enough.
You cannot put a 1000$ panel and condamn it to die with the computer.

But one thing I think they need is a bigger HD.

No, they need a FASTER disk. They'd need an Intel SSD.
In 2009-2010 is anachronistic to put the OS and Applications on a mechanical HDD.
For storage, you can use an external Firewire800 (and next year USB 3.0, FW3200 and LightPeak 10Gbps) hard disk (up to 2tb and daisy chainable on firewire800).

would also be nice if they gave a Solid State option for custom builds.
It would be even nicer if they started some kind of "no floppy EVER" revolution, but this time "no mechanical HDD as boot disk EVER on a Mac". But I think they'll do this on Fall 2010 when 256gb or 320gb SSD will be affordable.
In the mean time, I will mount an 80gb Intel x25-m on every mac of mine.
 
Still waiting leaks from BB or similar retailer (we got them quite a few times with new model numbers)
 
When the monitor is so bound to the computer, you cannot put a 1000$ panel inside. A 500$ 24" IPS panel is enough.
You cannot put a 1000$ panel and condamn it to die with the computer.



No, they need a FASTER disk. They'd need an Intel SSD.
In 2009-2010 is anachronistic to put the OS and Applications on a mechanical HDD.
For storage, you can use an external Firewire800 (and next year USB 3.0, FW3200 and LightPeak 10Gbps) hard disk (up to 2tb and daisy chainable on firewire800).


It would be even nicer if they started some kind of "no floppy EVER" revolution, but this time "no mechanical HDD as boot disk EVER on a Mac". But I think they'll do this on Fall 2010 when 256gb or 320gb SSD will be affordable.
In the mean time, I will mount an 80gb Intel x25-m on every mac of mine.

Can you explain the Intel SSD? yeah I get faster but mechanical HD is the only option for space!
 
I noticed that the shipping dates in danish online Apple Store is significant longer than it used to be.
The "high-end" (2,0Ghz 320GB) Mac mini is now listed with 8 business days shipping instead of the usual 24 hours.
The Apple Remote says 3-4 weeks before shipment.
Unfortunately it seems that there is no change regarding the shipment of the iMac's.
 
Can you explain the Intel SSD? yeah I get faster but mechanical HD is the only option for space!

onboard local storage is so passe and so totally 1990's.

These days it makes far more sense to put the OS and applications on a high speed, ultra high reliable device like SSD and store all of your music, videos, backups, etc, over a wired gig-E LAN to a device like the HP Mediasmart server.

With an external solution, especially ones like Drobo or the MSS, if you need more space you simply pop another disc in, or replace a small drive with a larger one. No need to upgrade and reinstall the OS due to an upgrade of the main system drive.

I've been doing things this way for a number of years and would never go back to having each computer in the home have a whopping huge hard drive for local storage of files.
 
The total lack of any pics regarding a new design makes me think we'll see the same old form factor.

Here's hoping it's in a more powerful computer. It's pretty hard to justify the cost of an iMac if it doesn't move away from C2D.

I'm still hoping, but not holding my breath at this point.
 
I really love the current design. Sure an update would be nice, but it may already be thinner, but I guess only time will tell!
 
I really love the current design. Sure an update would be nice, but it may already be thinner, but I guess only time will tell!

I agree with this. I have no interest in a new form factor, except as a means to get more kit inside.

My dream is a October miracle and Lynnfield inside, but I know that's not going to work, as the iMacs seem to have 45W processors, and the 45W version of that tech is the Core i7 Mobile.

There are C2 Quads at 4W, but they top out at 2.26. I would rather have a variable device with SMT from 1.7 - 3.0, than a flat 2.26 without SMT.
 
I noticed that the shipping dates in danish online Apple Store is significant longer than it used to be.
The "high-end" (2,0Ghz 320GB) Mac mini is now listed with 8 business days shipping instead of the usual 24 hours.
The Apple Remote says 3-4 weeks before shipment.
Unfortunately it seems that there is no change regarding the shipment of the iMac's.

8 days for Norwegian and Finnish stores too.
Still 24 h for Swedish and German stores though.
How about buying it for 9195 SEK (current price)?
This converts to around 1300 USD :eek:
 
I am unsure about other stores, but my Apple store has closed for this whole week and re-opens on Saturday. It's a really odd and promising coincidence. Not that all Apple stores would close lol, but if some needed to for whatever reason, this would be the week to do it and re-open with some new product.
 
I am unsure about other stores, but my Apple store has closed for this whole week and re-opens on Saturday. It's a really odd and promising coincidence. Not that all Apple stores would close lol, but if some needed to for whatever reason, this would be the week to do it and re-open with some new product.

Rennovation perhaps?
 
Yeah I think so but just seems like good timing if there were to be any updates this week. Basically I am thinking of anything to make myself believe I can buy a new machine this week! lol
 
I am unsure about other stores, but my Apple store has closed for this whole week and re-opens on Saturday. It's a really odd and promising coincidence. Not that all Apple stores would close lol, but if some needed to for whatever reason, this would be the week to do it and re-open with some new product.

yeah mine was rennovated during the week of Snow Leopard release nothing big.
 
I'm most interested in the Macbook.

If it's anything close to the Macbook Pro spec-wise (which I would expect if the MBP doesn't get a correlating speed bump), I'm gonna swallow my pride and go the Macbook route even tho I want a Pro. The cost savings would just be too much.

Now, if the Pro's get a speed bump (mainly the 2.53 becoming $1199 with the 2.26 being eliminated), then my decision becomes difficult again.
 
Now, if the Pro's get a speed bump (mainly the 2.53 becoming $1199 with the 2.26 being eliminated), then my decision becomes difficult again.


If that happens I'm getting a 2.53 immediately. If not I may well wait for the new MBP and build a hackintosh for now.

11.10am in cupertino and counting...
 
If that happens I'm getting a 2.53 immediately. If not I may well wait for the new MBP and build a hackintosh for now.

11.10am in cupertino and counting...

I'd get the 2.53 too. The 4 GB RAM and larger HD may be too hard to pass up.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.