Sure it's possible, but you can be that selective only if you have a finished product in your hands, ready to go. If your product's still in development - even in these late stages - you must either wait for it to complete, or give a date SO far in advance that you're (almost) certain to make it.Originally posted by PHGN
Is is not posible to announce the product and not have it actualy avalible right then and there?
2003.10.03 would make a great anouncement date, with delivery starting starting in time for the new Apple store's opening.
urther, if this does happen, can I go ahead and order my new Powerbook after the announcement and expect a set of 10.3 disks to arrive at some later date?
Originally posted by iHack
prices that don't subsidise US buyers - check
Let's compare a stock 17" Powerbook:
US Apple store (online): $ 2999,--
And to name few Euro prices (online):
German store � 3479,-- (VAT 16%) = US $ 3995
UK store GBP 2399,-- (VAT 17,5) = US $ 3983,--
Dutch store: � 3568,-- (VAT 19%) = US $ 4097,--
Belgian store � 3629,-- (VAT 21%) = US $ 4167,--
That's a European mark-up of about 33%. I checked G5's too - they take a 25% mark-up. Cross-Atlantic shipping must be very expensive...![]()
Hey, when I give myself a budget of $ 1100,00 I can buy a ticket for me and my wife, from Amsterdam to New-York and check into a nice hotel for a few days. When I buy my PowerBook while I there, I can still save money! Seems like a nice way to surprise her.
BTW, Japanese store 379800,-- (VAT ?) US $ 3397,-- equals + 13% Hey, what would a ticket to Tokyo cost...
M.
Originally posted by Thorben
Sorry, couldn't check where are you from, but what you´ve posted iss totaly wrong.
I´m living in Germany and just ordered a new Powerbook 15". I've paid 2650 Euros.
In all european countries the prices are already WITH taxes. So its not + 16% but - 16%. That´s quiet a difference.
I think in the USA you are not paing taxes when ordering online, are you? That´s different in germany. We have to.
PS: you said some 10,000,000 in the netherlands are living under the sea.
I don´t speak english very well - as you can see - but do you mean multipel 10 million people? you know there are only 16 million people living in the netherlands? *g*
usually, i think if it's already been said when it will be released and if you buy it on that day, it may already have it installed.Originally posted by PHGN
[BFurther, if this does happen, can I go ahead and order my new Powerbook after the announcement and expect a set of 10.3 disks to arrive at some later date? [/B]
The Coug Factor strikes again...Originally posted by Phil Of Mac
Educational discounts and high-speed internet are the only redeeming qualities of going to college, let me tell you.
Originally posted by bennetsaysargh
usually, i think if it's already been said when it will be released and if you buy it on that day, it may already have it installed.
Originally posted by iHack
prices that don't subsidise US buyers - check
Let's compare a stock 17" Powerbook:
US Apple store (online): $ 2999,--
And to name few Euro prices (online):
German store 3479,-- (VAT 16%) = US $ 3995
UK store GBP 2399,-- (VAT 17,5) = US $ 3983,--
Dutch store: 3568,-- (VAT 19%) = US $ 4097,--
Belgian store 3629,-- (VAT 21%) = US $ 4167,--
That's a European mark-up of about 33%. I checked G5's too - they take a 25% mark-up. Cross-Atlantic shipping must be very expensive...![]()
Hey, when I give myself a budget of $ 1100,00 I can buy a ticket for me and my wife, from Amsterdam to New-York and check into a nice hotel for a few days. When I buy my PowerBook while I there, I can still save money! Seems like a nice way to surprise her.
BTW, Japanese store 379800,-- (VAT ?) US $ 3397,-- equals + 13% Hey, what would a ticket to Tokyo cost...
M.
When I would buy in the US I can buy tax free as a tourist, when I buy from my local apple store, I have to pay VAT. The VAT account for about half the difference.Originally posted by BWhaler
There's a few flaws here:
1. If you are going to base your numbers on price differences, you need to either put in US taxes or take out European taxes. It'll make the price differences much smaller.
What causes the difference in the cost of doing business? I'm just asking because I would like to know2. The cost of doing business for a US company in the EU is higher than selling to US customers. Factor that in, and the price delta become miniscule.
I agree with the general sentiment that Apple needs to do more for non-US customers. They are 50% of Apple's installed base, and they are certainly not treated that way.
But let's keep the gripes rational. It's always comical when one reads things like, "Apple sucks because they won't release iTMS in the EU," when it is the EU laws preventing it. Your comment that EU buyers are subsidizing US buyers fall into that line of thinking.
Originally posted by Capt. Obvious
Excellent work, sir!
Still, I seem to recall Apple announcing that Panther will be 32-bit not 64-bit, AND that the G5s would run a 64-bit RAM enabler (call it what you will).
I only mention this because your excellent post seemed to say that this wouldn't, couldn't or shouldn't be done yet. Or are you saying that the "enabler" is just some mutation of double-precision-style longword fakery?
Originally posted by groovebuster
Be careful with blaming everything just on Apple. M-Audio never really got their act together in writing actually flawlessly working drivers for their hardware under Mac OS X.
groovebuster
There's a few flaws here:
1. If you are going to base your numbers on price differences, you need to either put in US taxes or take out European taxes. It'll make the price differences much smaller.
2. The cost of doing business for a US company in the EU is higher than selling to US customers. Factor that in, and the price delta become miniscule.
3. You're treating the prices as absolute numbers when in fact they are based on different currencies. Factor that in to your calculations, and again, the margin in small.
I agree with the general sentiment that Apple needs to do more for non-US customers. They are 50% of Apple's installed base, and they are certainly not treated that way.
But let's keep the gripes rational. It's always comical when one reads things like, "Apple sucks because they won't release iTMS in the EU," when it is the EU laws preventing it. Your comment that EU buyers are subsidizing US buyers fall into that line of thinking.
Originally posted by Rincewind42
A 32-bit operating system can give a single program, at most, 4GB of memory. A 64-bit operating system can give a single program, at most, 16 EB of memory. The Mac OS X build that is currently running on the PowerMac G5 (10.2.7) allows each program to access 4GB of RAM. This is because all of the pointers used in such programs are 32 bits. It also allows programs on this machines to use the full width of the G5's registers, and thus manipulate 64-bit integers without penalty.
Q: Why can't we just change the pointer size (to 64-bits) and get 16 EB memory spaces?
A: Because there is more to the change than just your code. Mac OS X (as all operating systems) provides you with a HUGE volume of precompiled code for your program to use. These libraries are necessary for your programs to even start running. And all of these libraries are built (currently) expecting 32-bit pointers. There is no way for these libraries to start dealing in 64-bit pointers without being recompiled.
Q: Ok, so we need to update our libraries. So lets just have them all just work with 64-bit pointers. Problem solved right?
A: No. Unfortunately, if you just change all your libraries to expect 64-bit pointers then your 32-bit programs will break when those libraries return a pointer that is out of range for them. So what you have to do instead is have two different libraries, one that handles 32-bit programs, and one that handles 64-bit programs, this way each kind of program gets the kind of pointers that it expects.
Q: Ok, so we need 2 versions of each library. So lets start cranking. Two weeks tops right?
A: Unfortunately no. When you create such an incredible additional mass of code, you need to test it. And testing it all takes a huge amount of time. It's hardly practical to expect it to happen quickly. Yes, much of Mac OS X was designed to be easily moved from 32 to 64 bits without much difficulty, but there are many edge cases where things don't quite work out of the box, either due to common usage of an API, or exceptional circumstance around that API.
For example, many APIs take a reference constant that is passed to a callback so the callback knows what context it is being called with. Unfortunately for some older APIs these reference constants are defined as 32 bit integers, but common practice has been to use them as pointers. So in moving to a 64 bit memory model, these APIs would need to be redefined to use 64 bit integers AND the programmers using them would need to check their code to make sure that they do the right thing when passing in the pointer (C/C++ doesn't allow you to pass a pointer as an integer without explicitly changing the data type. Code written for passing a 32 bit integer would thus clip your 64 bit pointers).
This is just one of many issues that would cause the testing time of new 64-bit libraries to take a LONG time. And before someone says it, no that doesn't make Carbon implicitly harder to move to 64-bit than Cocoa =). All of the newer, recommended Carbon APIs already use a pointer type for the reference constant instead of an integer.
Hopefully all this will clear up why it is a difficult task to add support for 64-bit memory spaces to an OS. Hopefully it has also put across that it should not be as difficult a task as it has been for that other operating system.
Originally posted by iHack
prices that don't subsidise US buyers - check
Originally posted by mistersquid
Either you need to go to a new college or you should quit going.
Originally posted by AidenShaw
Mac OS X 10.4 "Wildcat" will be 64-bit, though.
You need a 64-bit O/S to allow your programs to use more than 4 GiB of RAM.... With a 32-bit O/S, a single program can't use the 8 GiB that the G5 can support.
Originally posted by vrapan
2. Apple hardly does bussiness per se in the EU. They do not have a store presense only a web site they have as far as I know only one assembly in Ireland and they only have some tech support which much of it is done through by outsourcing and for which they DO collect a heavy premium because if you check UK and US Applecare prices the difference is ridiculous.
Originally posted by vrapan
3. EXACTLY the Euro presently is at 1.15 per dollar so it means even if numerically the prices were exactly the same then Apple collects 15% more dollars on a EU sale than on the US sale. So every single extra "numerical" euro paid in EU or UK is a Euro too much. UK currency has been at 1.6 for long time but Apple still seems to be working with a 1.5 exchange rate.
Originally posted by vrapan
4. As about the iTunes EU legislation on copyrights is less strict than the US legislation. So this is hardly a reason for a delayed iTunes. MS got around an EU music store so EU legislation can hardly be blamed although Apple does not have the whole blame there either......
Originally posted by vrapan
Before you try and defend pricing policies please get an economics 101 course please and if you dont feel like going back to school just get your facts straight
IT'S AN AMERICAN COMPANY!
You don't hear me whining about the Germans paying less for a BMW, or about the Japanese paying less for everything Sony makes
By that criteria, Apple didn't hardly even do business in America until a few years ago.
Can you buy a Mac in Europe? Apple does business in Europe. Can you buy a Mac in North Korea? Not too easily, because Apple doesn't do business there.
I'm sure Apple wants to hire staff just to check the exchange rates every morning and adjust prices accordingly.
Microsoft is willing to allow stricter DRM than Apple is.
I'm glad to report that Econ 101 is another one of the redeeming qualities of going to college. So is getting an A in it, so far.
Originally posted by Catfish_Man
Ouch... sucks to be an Apple coder right now... this sounds about as painful as what MS is having to do with VPC (go through and find all the places they used psuedo-little-endian mode and change it to use a swap instead).
Originally posted by vrapan
And you shouldn't because BMWs are not cheaper in Germany than in USA and Sony products cost about the same as they do in Japan.
Originally posted by vrapan
I am aware of that but Apple as far as I am aware is taxed in the USA by the US taxing laws right? My point was that Apple hardly has any substantial number of emplyees in EU apart form the Irish assembly and some tech support most of which it outsources. So Apple really bears very small burden of red tape in EU. By no bussiness I meant they hardly own or operate something in the EU where EU laws would make that something more expensive to operate than in the US. Their bulk of staff - plants - headquarters is in US - EU business law hardly affects them.
Originally posted by vrapan
If Apple sells half their Macs outside US then yes they do have enough people to check exchange rates. My point was not that however. My point was that in the price equation you have to use that variable as well. And as of right now for the same numerical value EU citizens pay 15% more dollars.
Originally posted by vrapan
Sure enough but my point was that EU law did not stop MS and EU law does not stop Apple so he should not blame EU law. Feel free to blame Record Lables practices.
With BMW you are correct. With Sony, my check was hindered by my illiteracy in Japanese. However, I couldn't help but notice that Europeans have a wider selection of German sports cars than we Americans. Stick that in your iTMS and smoke it.