Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not a fan of the snow leopard image. I liked the new Aurora with the shiny black X from the beta DVD MUCH more. I'm guessing Bertrand picked it without consulting Steve first. It's space prison for him!

What is wrong with the picture of the Snow Leopard? Fashion is changing, design is changing - and Apple is changing as well.
 
We all know that its a BUGFIX SPEED BOOST os, so we are not getting our hopes up for a $30 upgrade...but we are also excited for a change.. if that makes sense.

Mate, apart from the kernel and extensions - everything is 64bit. I don't know about you but it is a big improvement over Leopard. The finder alone has been giving a giant boot up the behind and now isn't a horrible, unresponsive, beach ball addicted lump of executable.

I'm sorry that your loins aren't excited over the fact that all the improvements are under the hood but sometimes the best improvements are those you can't see from looking at the surface.
 
No way....

No matter how ready the retail packaging is the Snow Leopard, and even if it is already ready to be shipped to the stores and points of sales, there is no way Apple would release the new OS anytime before September. The release date it is even on their official web page. A last minute change would make the company look bad. Besides, I cannot recall any occasion in which Apple released a product earlier than the announced date. We've seen unavoidable delays, for instance, with Leopard. In other words, nothing will come out, not before September 1st.
 
Did you clean install or update the necessary files?


Also, the packaging looks decent. I'm fine with it, just Leopard's packaging was incredibly sexy.

I upgraded since that appeared to be the only option upon DVD bootup. I know that I could've hit "Customize" to get to the Clean Install option but I figured I'd take the dive and simply upgrade.

I will say though that I added the "force Intel 64bit" string to the Boot .plist file and noticed some improvement.

Now if only iLife (esp. iPhoto and iMovie) were coded for 64-bit efficiency...:cool:
 
wow..

i saw a pic of the disc last week and thought it was fake.


wtf apple. that sh*t looks like it was made by my little sister.
 
The Snow Leopard would look better as a cartoon

A cartoon Snow Leopard will look better than the real thing. That is because a snow leopard is meant to be seen in bright light, and the packaging will not be able to portray that. So a cartoon made by Pixar will be more cuddly and bright and clean looking -- and brighter. So they need a Pixar Snow Leopard instead of a picture. He should be called "Snowy." A movie of Snowy battling the ugly MicrosoftEmpire with Darth Gates would also be a big hit.
 
A cartoon Snow Leopard will look better than the real thing. That is because a snow leopard is meant to be seen in bright light, and the packaging will not be able to portray that. So a cartoon made by Pixar will be more cuddly and bright and clean looking -- and brighter. So they need a Pixar Snow Leopard instead of a picture. He should be called "Snowy." A movie of Snowy battling the ugly MicrosoftEmpire with Darth Gates would also be a big hit.

What are you talking about? That's a real picture of a Snow Leopard.
 
I agree completely. In fact, it's major advantage--speed--is not even noticeable on my MacBook (Core 2 Duo, Early 2007). Snow Leopard, despite all the hype, is a rather boring release for consumers.

If Apple didn't use the 10.X.X moniker for patch updates, I would have given Snow Leopard a 10.5.5 version number similar to the the old OS 7/8 days.

There's no question why they priced it at $29.

Not surprised to see that the sentiment is shared ;)
 
compare:

IMG_0890.JPG


upup_toilet_comparison.jpg


both images taken from google.



so your mad because someone doesn't agree with you?

OMG I thought the Company names were for metaphors!!!

I didnt think they were real brands. @_@
 
OMG I thought the Company names were for metaphors!!!

I didnt think they were real brands. @_@

Its our Target Brand. We just ditched the ribbion like look of "Target Brand" for the clean, apple like look of "Up and up" . i like the new look and even the name, and when I do cashier, I see a lot of up and up come though our lanes.

and your right, store brands are the "real" brands under the store label. (even though Target says its not made my so and so compney, even though the package is exactly the same as the compney they say its not made by)
 
I'm calling fake on this one guys... Sorry, but I know a thing or two about design and marketing, and this is just too inconsistent for Apple.

It would also be inconsistent of Apple to make the printed label different from the icon that shows up in the installer (which is this same image of a snow leopard).

Look at http://www.apple.com/macosx/ and see how they've marketed snow leopard thus far. Notice the big front and center X... Apple knows "X" is the brand they want people to recognize, and people do. They aren't going to change that any time soon. Why in the world would apple all of the sudden change the packaging to something completely different than the keynotes/websites/ads all reflect. They wont. It would be asinine. Granted, if I'm wrong, I guess I'll just lose a lot of faith in Apple's design team.

True they have used that X in Snow Leopard branding, but this was all back in June, during WWDC. I don't suspect they are going away from the X, but as a product differentiation from Leopard, I think it makes sense.
 
I too think Apple could have done something a lot more special than a copy paste of a snow leopard on the box...

Ahh, damn it... Apple has changed so much since Steve chose to be absent. :(
Uhh... It's box art. I'm pretty sure box art decisions proceed routinely, with or without the intervention of Steve Jobs.
Apple needs something more then a dumb X to grab peoples attention in the store.
The "dumb X" seems to have worked quite well for Mac OS X since 2001. But now that the Snow Leopard box art won't feature an "X," it's suddenly dumb and uncool, right?
I was really hoping for the usual nebulous "X" package but I'll take it anyway! I just can't decide if I want to just upgrade or buy a box set.
Upgrading should work fine for most people. The only reason you'd want to spend $169 on the Mac Box Set is if you really want to do a clean install, although I really don't think you'd need to...
That's a gorgeous design for the packaging... jawdroppingly gorgeous. :eek: Beautiful way to usher in the coming of a new OS!
It's a nice image, yes, but it's not "jaw-dropping beautiful." It's just box art, nothing more, nothing less. Most people will open the box, remove the DVD and throw the box away.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.