Only on the CPU front, and the OS of course..!
My ram is DDR4 as well
What Tim and Apple are doing is absolutely right for the company. Those complaining and hating on Apple and Tim are broadly speaking living in the dark ages.
The top of your post says all that needs to be said. Windows - the bloated, virus at tracking, daily reboot required, buggy operating system. No thank you. I would rather pay more for macs that last 4-6 years than this crap O/S and low quality hardware no matter what the specs.
Explain exactly why *you* need more than 16. Without bringing up Virtual Machines, which you have no business running on a mobile device.
That's the exact same thing people said about the iPhone 7 for taking away the headphone jack and now Samsung specs show that their new phone for 2017 won't have a headphone jack.Might sound silly of me, but I really hope this Macbook Pro flops, it would be a great lesson for Apple.
Why are you doing that on a laptop (other than while traveling) in the first place? I'm just curious because you'd think if you've got deadlines to hit and angry client's you'd be using the appropriate tool for the job, no?Ok, thank you for telling the world they have no business deciding what to run on their laptops oh mighty arbiter of MacRumors. But no. No virtual machines.
I work in the Visual Effects industry for film and Television, as a concept artist and a 3D generalist. The data-sets we create and throw around can be pretty massive at times. Ram constraints mean slow performance at best (annoying and disruptive to an artist's workflow) and missed deadlines and angry clients at worst.
My wallet isn't big enough to show my love for the new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar.Vote with your wallet.
Can you honestly call it a pro machine when the ram capacity is the same as the laptop from 6 years ago?
Only on the CPU front, and the OS of course..!
My ram is DDR4 as well
I still can't believe they removed so much of the important ports for the sake of making the computer thinner.
Oh spec wars are so much fun...let us continue...It doesn't show that that is an SLI setup, so 2x on the video... also, the dual SSDs, and also, my system has been blessed by the Pope and Steve Jobs, and Woz personally manhandled every component, inspecting them all for micro-fractures. Further, when I send emails it deposits $100 each into my banking account, simply because every server which touches it is so happy with my system specs they feel the need to donate.
agreed. I wish Windows was an alternative for me, but it is a horrible O/S. If it isn't Unix, it is a toy.I would rather a mac with these specs, no question, but we make do
The delays are on Intel people. I have and will continue to say that Apple should be designing MacOS for ARM so they can control the chips and not having to be subservient to Intel.
As for 16gb of RAM, that's very limited in terms of effected users and I've read that it too is an Intel issue. Seems like a stop-gap in terms of processor as Intel flounders.
Ok, thank you for telling the world they have no business deciding what to run on their laptops oh mighty arbiter of MacRumors. But no. No virtual machines.
I work in the Visual Effects industry for film and Television, as a concept artist and a 3D generalist. The data-sets we create and throw around can be pretty massive at times. Ram constraints mean slow performance at best (annoying and disruptive to an artist's workflow) and missed deadlines and angry clients at worst.
What is wrong: using a MacBook.If 16 GB of RAM is hurting your productivity, you're doing something wrong. It's not even debatable.
If 16 GB of RAM is hurting your productivity, you're doing something wrong. It's not even debatable.
Well said... but we will be in the minority here because the influx of newbie posts just keeps growing. LolI'm sorry but this kind of statement just makes me furious. It is beyond ignorant. The new MBP has 4 ports which can do literally anything. It sets the standard for the future where a multitude of different limited I/O is a nightmare of the past. Who ****ing cares what kind of cable you need to use to accomplish it?
When you hang on things like "the cable" and ignore all the benefits that come with it...you're not even trying, or just outright trolling.
MagSafe is amazing, I agree. But all other things equal, you are looking at dedicated a slot to either MagSafe or another USB C port. When I am not charging my laptop, it's not like I can retroactively turn that MagSafe charging port into a USB or display port. I am stuck with MagSafe whether I need it or not. USB C is more versatile and given a choice, I would be willing to give up MagSafe for USB C.
Apple have made a big point in the past of emphasing that the Mac sales continued to grow while the rest of the PC industry sales were declining, so they have managed to avoid that trend in the past.
[doublepost=1478099419][/doublepost]Don't you understand it is betterThis actually has a good reason. Apparently the intel chipsets only support 16G low energy ram, the few laptops that do offer more have serious hits to battery performance. Supposedly in 2018 Intel will be releasing a chipset that will support 32 low energy ram.![]()
Have you looked at the SSD transfer rates of even the lowest end 2016 MBP? Significantly faster than last years, and commensurate with RAM rates used in the laptop.