Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can even access verge review, it shows 404 LOL. anyways who cares what reviews say. I want one and I am upgrading from 12 PM. 14PM see you on Friday!
 
Here you go https://www.tomsguide.com/reviews/iphone-14-pro


unlike the rest of the reviews they actually did tests. i swear most of the reviews on the phone is vague and personal which doesn’t offer much to go off of. We needs stats and confirmation of apples claims. Toms guide discovered 2000 nits doesn’t get hit and they found battery life subpar.

gizmodo, tech radar and basically 80 percent of reviewers were sucking up to apple big time.
Toms Guide has been pretty questionable on some product ratings in the past. I think they are big Android people over there. Least that’s what it seems to me.
 
Apple wants you to buy the Pro so they aren’t going to make the cheaper phone an intriguing purchase. It’s just there to fill up a hole in their lineup.

How much margin do they make on the Pro though? I wouldn't be surprised if they made more on regular 14
 
I am always the most excited for the cameras...based on what I have watched and seen, the cameras seem to be a considerable improvement in detail. I am by no means a "Pro" , but enjoy taking photos and love taking scenic landscape shots when I have the opportunity. The 48mp raw is going to be great. Even the 12mp binned photos look much more detailed. Youtube channel Gadgetmatch posted a photo with the telephoto lens at night, compared to the 13 PM, and the detail and lighting difference was astonishing IMO.

I was a bit sour on the "dynamic island", but Im a bit softened to it now.

Most of the reviews that I have reviewed have all been fairly positive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KurtWilde
Seems like it should’ve been called the iPhone 13S pro….instead of iPhone 14 pro.
If we followed Apple's classic naming scheme, it would be iphone 12SS. Apple has dropped the S badge and simply went with numerical only from 11 onward.

Everything on the 14 Pro is expected improvements over 13 Pro. Apple never intended for the last year iphone users to upgrade. They are after those with 12 Pro or older. Trickle updates to justify yearly releases.

Besides, if these reviewers are actually tech reviewers, they would've done a deep dive into the A16 and what it brings to the table. But no, they're all simply talking about the superficial features, lifestyle bloggers pretending to be tech reviewers. 😆 Here's hoping for Anandtech to do the real tech review.
 
I watched the keynote and I know what I’m buying and for what reasons. I’m still excited and will be my own critic.

I don’t need reviewers making my decisions for me. 👊😎👍
I'm coming from a XR to a 14 Pro Max. It's going to be night and day for me ...

giphy.gif




I also live in a first world country in which I don't take for granted our insane level of privilege and luxuries.
 
I guess "meh" is in the eye of the beholder. The review in your link gives it 4.5 out of 5 stars, said there were "big camera upgrades", it's "a poweruser’s dream", has "got power for days" and concludes: "I think that the iPhone 14 Pro is truly the best phone that Apple has ever released, crushing everything else before it. It easily earns my utmost recommendation."

It does note that it "isn’t the huge upgrade you might have expected, but that’s because the iPhone 13 Pro did a lot right." But really, I wouldn't call that a "meh" review by any stretch of the imagination. I suppose you might be disappointed if you want a new phone every year, but I'm not one of those people. Still completely happy with my own 12 Pro Max with no plan to upgrade this year.
This.

Case in point I have a 12 Pro Max that I’m mostly happy with although the battery is starting to degrade a tad. I was planning to keep it but the Dynamic Island and Space Black color woo’d me. But the 12 Pro Max is still a great phone. No noticeable lag or anything of the sort.

It’s a different game than years past where performance grew by leaps and bounds each generation and the software demands almost necessitated an upgrade every other year at most in order to not feel choppy. Even the iPhone 11 series is still plenty fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyd01
Side note but The Verge's new site is potentially the most disgusting news site I've ever seen, I can't believe it got green lit. It's not just gross to look at but practically impossible to read because of the formatting.
The same people that green lit their How To Build A PC video. Honestly, their new website may be one of the worst designs I've seen since dial-up.
 
I think people are just jaded and spoiled by technology.
More like these tech reviewers with free review units basically get something that looks different every other month, so they are jaded that any newer product has to look different than the older one.

It has basically become like car reviews, where most of the talk are only skin deep about the outer appearance and design changes.
 
More like these tech reviewers with free review units basically get something that looks different every other month, so they are jaded that any newer product has to look different than the older one.

It has basically become like car reviews, where most of the talk are only skin deep about the outer appearance and design changes.
Yeah. They get everything new under the sun for free. They don't have the same excitement for tech as us plebs.
 
Sounds like mkbhdhd is a clown. Doesn’t dive into camera but also says it’s the best camera in a smartphone.

But from what I’m seeing is that most won’t be able to see differences from 13 pro pics. Unless you want to play with raw pics in good lighting.

I’m guessing many will be disappointed here having been misled thinking 48mp meant a leap in quality.
None of the other lifestyle bloggers are doing any deep dive either. (note that pixel peeping != deep dive).

The only site that does real deep dive on iPhone reviews that I've seen is Anandtech.

But at least MKBHD has a more neutral tone in his content. The other lifestyle bloggers are tend to be more flamey and clickbaity with their words just to incite flamewars (and generate engagement) in their comment section.
 
Lol all the usual Apple YouTubers were given same colors of each model. Course they won’t say anything “bad” else they’ll be on Apple S list next year and not get their freebies. Let’s not be naive about these bias reviews huh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kubiq1

verge didnt seem overjoyed by it
(also LOL to the new design, gotta bleach my eyes now after witnessing that)
Jeez, this sharpening is ridiculous. And people thought, "Once Apple goes to 48MP, they'll do it right. They won't rush into it like Android OEMs did."

Apple copied exactly the Android OEM mistake: massive oversharpening to compensate for no-real-detail improvements from these "upgraded" high-megapixel sensors.

And night shots still seem devoid of most colors:

Blue? iPhone 14 says that's white.
Orange? iPhone 14 says nope: that's off-white.
Green at the bottom left? iPhone 14 is yet about another shade of white?

SCR-20220915-dah-2.png


I also don't understand why Apple's white balance is still frequently too-warm. The displays are already red-tinted, so having red-shifted photos is no help either.
 
A proper review and comparison needs to have both the new and the previous model be of the same physical size (Pro Max vs Pro Max), same tier (non-Pro vs non-Pro or Pro vs Pro), and same iOS version (iOS 16.0 public non-beta release)

If any reviewer cites how the new device performs now and compares it with the previous generation when it was new then that is flawed...
 
  • Like
Reactions: LalaN
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.