Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
MKBHD is one of the best and least biased reviewers on YouTube. I'd watch more of his videos before you make a snap judgement about him.
Is he really? I have heard many say that its clear he doesn't like to be hard on the big companies when doing reviews and hardly says anything negative or bad about iPhones. It's clear that he isn't being true.
 
Has Xperia fixed the boot loop/screen failure yet?

My company provided Z3, and multiple customers z1/2/3 all had to be sent away for boot looping and/or display failure that bricked the phone. It put me off Xperia phones for personal use, Sony didn’t seem too concerned about fixing it at the time. It was similar to the long-standing LG boot loop issue.
I had the Xperia 5 III and never had those issues. I didn't hang out in the Xperia online circles so I'm not sure if those issues still persist.

-Tristan
 

verge didnt seem overjoyed by it
(also LOL to the new design, gotta bleach my eyes now after witnessing that)
The Verge sucks and has no credibility with anything related to tech, especially after their "how to build a PC" video.

And yes, their new website was built by the same people in charge of understanding tech at The Verge.
 
MKBHD is one of the best and least biased reviewers on YouTube. I'd watch more of his videos before you make a snap judgement about him.

His earlier work was more detailed.

I get the feeling he's doing a lot more work now (not just with smartphones) and as such doesn't really put in the same effort like he used to.

I find his reviews now a little 'nothingy'. He often gets details wrong too.

By contrast, I thought The Verge's review this time was great.
 
Turn subtitles on (depending how good your Chinese is!), he starts photo details/comparisons around 21:45



edit: I also enjoyed this showdown against the S22 Ultra


Thankfully I don't need subtitles for the first.
 
His earlier work was more detailed.

I get the feeling he's doing a lot more work now (not just with smartphones) and as such doesn't really put in the same effort like he used to.

I find his reviews now a little 'nothingy'. He often gets details wrong too.

By contrast, I thought The Verge's review this time was great.
I don't agree he's the best YouTuber at all. Like you said, he often gets details wrong and his newest videos are half-baked. His channel spends a lot more time now on fancy intros than quality content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supergt
I don't agree he's the best YouTuber at all. Like you said, he often gets details wrong and his newest videos are half-baked. His channel spends a lot more time now on fancy intros than quality content.

Yes. There are plenty of better channels for reviews. Sometime the best takes come from relatively small channels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fred Zed and Shh
Of course you’re meant to upgrade every year. Everyone knows that.
Forgive me, I can't tell if you're being facetious or not, lol. I would have agreed with the person you were responding to, that it makes little sense to me to review from the point of view of upgrading every year...but it seems that's the way Apple is encouraging people to go with the iPhone Upgrade Program, which in a way turns iPhone customers from buyers into renters, renters that get the newest iPhone every year as part of their rent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cardfan
Ya 13 pro has better saturation.

the 14 pro only excels over the 13 pro in one area and that is night time telephoto lens sharper and less noise.
Sorry but all reviews today are by definition BS to me when I will have an iPhone 14 Pro in hand on Friday and can form my own opinion based on my own skills (I am a photographer) and needs. Wannabe internet influencers primarily seeking clicks are really just noise at this point.
 
Last edited:
The reviews need to stop taking in the previous years. You are not MEANT to upgrade EVERY year. The phone should be reviewed as a standalone phone and not as a yearly upgrade.
Very key point. Mostly, year over year upgrades will be relatively useless as a guide for most people. There's some value in talking about that - what do the new models tell us about Apple's focus, etc - but relatively few people upgrade every year. I'd be more interested in comparisons to the model 2 years previous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allen_Wentz
Disappointed with the photos to be honest, to me the 13 Pro photos looks much richer and more depth. For me the Camera was the major motivation to upgrade but now I think I will just keep my 13 Pro.

Take your own iPhone 14 Pro photos, then be disappointed, or not. Other photogs' photos are only representative of what they created whilst seeking internet clicks...

Personally I expect the value add of the v14 iPhone Pro changes to be complex, and will take time to learn to take advantage of. After months of use I certainly find that true with my 46 MP Nikon.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KurtWilde
It's all relative to what phone you previously had really. I keep seeing people online complain about the 14 pro. I actually don't care if it's a truly incremental improvement or a huge improvement over the iPhone 13 Pro. I'm coming from an XS so I'm going to see a big change in battery, screen size (going pro max), the 120hz display, the cameras and new video functions, losing the notch, AOD (should I used it), and I'm sure I'll notice more as I use it. I think the main thing is that many people complaining are coming from a 13 Pro or maybe even a 12 Pro. That doesn't mean everyone is upgrading from one of those so no one can say definitively if it's worth it for another person to upgrade. Do what will make you happy.
 
Bottom line: regardless of how you or others perceive the improvements, if consumers continue to spend 1k+ for it, consumers see value and Apple has a winning formula. Sure there are plenty of smartphones that will win in some areas over the iPhone, but the iPhone is still best in class because it’s not lopsided on what it delivers where much of the Android world will favor a handful of standout talents.
 
Bottom line: regardless of how you or others perceive the improvements, if consumers continue to spend 1k+ for it, consumers see value and Apple has a winning formula. Sure there are plenty of smartphones that will win in some areas over the iPhone, but the iPhone is still best in class because it’s not lopsided on what it delivers where much of the Android world will favor a handful of standout talents.

"The iPhone has a great camera"
---------"Yeah, well, the Huawei has a slightly better one"

"The Pro Max battery life is amazing"
---------"Yeah, well, the Oppo lasts even longer"

"The iPhone has great speakers"
---------"Yeah, well, the Black Shark 5 sounds better"

Ok, but I can't buy a 'HuawOppoShark' can I?
Where can I buy a single phone that does extremely well (best in class or 2nd best in class) in each of those areas, as well as having at least half a decade of guaranteed day one software updates?
 
Allison Johnson has in her headline (I don't know if she wrote the headline, though): "Welcome to the iPhone 13S". Like that's a bad thing! The S years are the best ones.

There's also this (emphasis mine):
Most people should consider other options, but there is an argument for the iPhone 14 if you meet a narrow set of criteria: you’re on an iPhone 12 or older, you really want the satellite SOS feature, you prefer a 6.1-inch screen size...

She lists a couple more reasons. But since when is "on an iPhone 12 or older" part of a narrow set of criteria? That's everyone that didn't buy an iPhone in the last year. And even some of those bought SEs. It really annoys me, this treatment of S years as a pejorative.

In my view, if you've got a 13, you don't need a 14. That's true to me every year. But let's say you're on an older phone, and you want a 13 or 14 (non pro, 6.1"). Then all you've got to do is determine if you want to spend the extra $100 on some features that are not on the 13. It's not a lot of features, but it's some. She even goes over them all in the review.
 
Upgrades are supposed to be incremental. If they weren't phones would be even more expensive and there would be other issues with universal software support that covers a decent range of both old and new. I know I'd rather have software support that lasts several years than a new IOS each year that only covers that one years' phones.

my 2 cents - it's good enough to get me (and many others) to quit crying about the 5.8" size and upgrade their 11's, so that should tell you something...
 
Ok, but I can't buy a 'HuawOppoShark' can I?
Where can I buy a single phone that does extremely well (best in class or 2nd best in class) in each of those areas, as well as having at least half a decade of guaranteed day one software updates?
Samsung is the only one that can probably compete in the same ring as Apple in a world of equals, but what holds them back is probably the pace of progress with Android - they can customize around it, and then can make some core improvements, but they have to balance that against how much has to be reworked against the next versions of Android.

In an alternate reality, if Samsung ran the Android program entirely, things could get super interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diorama and kc9hzn
I’ve got an iPhone XR that the battery is wearing out on (like about 80% battery health). Considering that I’d like increased storage, increased RAM, and an LED display (those things would dramatically improve my day to day experience using the phone), I’m probably going to upgrade instead of just replace the battery. This was already the case before the iPhone 14 announcement, but the Dynamic Island looks a lot better than I was expecting, so the iPhone 14 Pro is on my radar now. I don’t know if I’m going to upgrade this year or next year (I plan on upgrading my Apple Watch this release year, and I don’t know if I’ll have the money to also replace the phone), but, if I upgrade this release year, I’m definitely gonna try to go for the iPhone 14 Pro. (I probably don’t need the Pro Max, in my opinion, the XR is about as large as I’d go screenwise, and that and some more battery life seem to be the only benefit of the upgrade.)

People who upgrade every year may well think the 14 or the 14 Pro are “meh” upgrades, but, for someone like me, when we upgrade, we get all the cumulative upgrades from the previous years. When I upgrade my watch, I’ll get the pulse oximeter and the systemwide keyboard (and the sleep improvements from the 8, when I eventually upgrade again and relegate the 8 to sleep tracking duty). One year’s upgrade might be “meh”, but once you’re talking about three to four years’ “meh” upgrades, you’re starting to talk about some serious upgrades.
 
The iPhone 14 Pro upgrade seems to bigger step than iPhone 12 Pro to the iPhone 13 Pro. It has a lot of cool features, such as the Dynamic Island and always on display. The reviews have given the iPhone 14 Pro a pretty good score, so I don't know how you came to the conclusion of "..well meh"? Why would the iPhone 14 Pro get a good score, if it the conclusion was "well meh" ? Unless there is a conspiracy of Apple paying the reviewers...
 
The iPhone 14 Pro upgrade seems to bigger step than iPhone 12 Pro to the iPhone 13 Pro. It has a lot of cool features, such as the Dynamic Island and always on display. The reviews have given the iPhone 14 Pro a pretty good score, so I don't know how you came to the conclusion of "..well meh"? Why would the iPhone 14 Pro get a good score, if it the conclusion was "well meh" ? Unless there is a conspiracy of Apple paying the reviewers...

I believe the OP is referring to reviews of the iPhone 14, and not the pro.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.