Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I fail to see how this affects the store clerk. I mean really. And how do you think the kind of change the OP is referring to actually makes it's way to the decision makers? It starts at the ground level, or the front lines--if you will.

The person is advocating purposely going in a store, getting items, and going up to the checkout with the express purpose of just leaving the items there without buying.

You don't think that adds on more work at the end of the night that needs to get done on top of everything else and might cause them to go home later? Especially when multiple people are doing this, *on purpose*?!

It's one thing if the person discovers when he comes up there a practice the store does he dislikes and decides not to shop. It's another when the person had no intention of shopping anyways and just wanted to make a point. He can easily make a point by calling corporate and telling them why he's not shopping there. In fact, that will make a far larger point than just being an a** to the cashier. Corporate is going to notice more when people are going out of their way to directly complain to them than people being jerks to the cashiers. Several cashiers have to complain before the manager is even going to mention it to corporate and corporate is going to have to hear from several managers before they take it seriously. Where as the customer they hear directly from they will take more seriously (and escapes having to have several cashiers complain to managers before corporate even hears about it).

So not only is it an a** to some one who really didn't set policies, it's not even as effective as taking it to the people who did set the policies! And hell, it's more work on the a** too. Having to drive to the store, use his/her gas, take time to shop, and take time to make their point vs. calling a number on the phone and making the complaint.

And for the record, I'm not saying it's stupid not to shop at Rite Aid over this (I think the fact they obviously are purposely trying to block it in order to push some other payment method they support is obnoxious enough to boycott it, especially a payment method that wants them to have access to my checking account... I don't want that one to "win" so yes, I will be less likely to support merchants who actively try to push it). I just think this method proposed of boycotting/speaking your mind is just acting like an a** and is more likely to get people to just look badly on Apple Pay then do much good (I mean i'm sorry, if I was behind you in line, I don't care if I agreed with you, I'd still think you were looking like an a**. Just imagine those who aren't so paying attention and don't really care one way or the other will think?).
 
Last edited:
Please, everyone get over yourselves for saying, "Guess I won't be shopping there..."



If it's around the corner and you need to pick something up, you sure as hell will be shopping there in a few weeks.


I "sure as hell" won't. I regularly drive by competing grocery stores to get to the one I prefer, and drive by competing pharmacies to get to the one I prefer. I regularly drive a little further to get to the home improvement store I prefer even though there is another one, of the same chain, a little closer. Distance from my house is not my primary consideration when I go to a store of any type.
 
So you think the US Government should drop what they're doing and save all the iPhone 6 users who can't use their shiny new smartphones to pay for stuff at Rite-Aid?

Sounds completely reasonable to me.

When it comes to a bunch of merchants colluding to try to push out a payment method in favor of their own that only benefits them and not the consumer? Actually, yes. That's not the free market at work.

It would be one thing if Rite-Aid didn't want to buy NFC terminals or if they had to pay a fee to activate them and didn't want to. But actively turning them off to make sure it is more inconvenient? Worse, the contract saying that if they are supporting this one pay method they can't support the other? I think it's at least a gray area.

At the least I don't think people are overreacting by deciding they don't want to support that behavior, even if it is legal. Why should we support something that isn't in our interest? I want a more secure way of paying that doesn't collect my information. Not some form of payment that is done solely so they can get more info on me. And even worse keeps information on my checking account on their servers making them really appealing targets to hackers... I mean not even to my credit cards, straight to my money itself...

Yeah, I think it is perfectly reasonable to avoid merchants that are trying to push this.
 
Over 600 posts in this thread and 400+ in the BOA thread whining about Apple Pay being accepted or not accepted and whose fault it was/is. Now that's priceless. And for everything else, there's Mastercard.
 
Load up a cart at the offending (non-ApplePay) merchant and go to checkout.

When they say,

"Oh, we don't support ApplePay."

You say,

"Cancel the sale. I'll shop somewhere else."

If everyone does this, merchants will quickly get the picture and throng to get on-board.

Here's why that's nonsense:
1) the people making minimum wage won't give 1% of a ****.
2) upper management/decision makers won't know it's happening
3) the amount of people using apple pay is probably extremely small (especially at this point)
4) why would you DRIVE FARTHER from your house to save .5 seconds at checkout??

9ba7c6ea873e92693ab18ef904eb1daf56cbb3eb24d9addfc25dc4e10540aa9a.jpg
 
I believe MCX is all about cutting VISA and MASTER CARD out of the picture by WALMART and their cronies. APPLE partnered with VISA and MC to create ApplePay so if the Walmart junta accepts it, they can't cut VISA and MC out and keep the transaction fees for themselves. My take for what is worth. WALMART has got one foot in the grave already. Now they are hacking off High-Demographic iPhone owners by not accepting ApplePay which is a "GREAT" idea on their part.
 
By law it is illegal to turn down US currency at any US business. I think the US ought to pass a new law stating that if the business has an NFC terminal that they must accept all forms of NFC payment (Google Wallet, Apple Pay, etc.).

Yea that's just what we need. More laws and legislation from the nanny state. :rolleyes:

----------

Image

Seriously though, we will shop elsewhere. Not sure why there needs to be a "payment wars". This isn't like Blu-ray vs. HD DVD. If you don't like taking my money then that's fine by me, I'll go elsewhere! Going against Apple hasn't really worked out so well for everyone.

Haha....Remember when Verizon laughed at the iPhone like it was some kind of toy? :cool:
 
:rolleyes: No, it isn't. Companies refuse to take certain credit cards, even while they accept others, all the time. There is no requirement that companies accept specific forms of payment--a business could turn their credit card readers off completely if they wanted to. Or they could go the other way if they wanted: they could stop accepting cash, which is how the entire internet functions.

Seriously, where do people get this stuff?

That's because we live in the UESA (United Entitlement States of America)

----------

MercentC is not secure. They store your information in their cloud and it is geared toward advertising.

http://www.mcx.com/downloads/Merchant_Customer_Exchange_Unveils_Consumer_Brand_09032014.pdf

"A more secure way to pay. CurrentC will provide a more secure payment experience than traditional methods by storing users’ sensitive financial information in its cloud vault rather than locally on the mobile device. Furthermore, the application uses a token placeholder to facilitate transactions instead of constantly passing the data between the user, merchant and financial institution. These innovative approaches to security are only a sample of industry- leading tools used by CurrentC to create a comprehensive, layered approach to information security."

Jennifer Lawrence should be a walking example of not not trusting cloud storage. Retail data breaches....have we not learned anything? I swear we are our own worst enemy.
 
Apparently RiteAid doesn't want me as a customer. No problem. I can find the same Sh&**y service and shorter lines at their competition.
 
I agree with this an extent, but I also feel not using the available tech, is just as lazy.:cool:

Apple Pay is more about safety and security, then speed and ease, all though speed, ease, safe and secure, that's a win!:cool:

I guess I'm lazy, but I'll have more time being lazy now.;)

That is true. Safety and security is a big thing. But I think not shopping at a store because apple pay doesn't work/disabled is dumb. Apple pay just came out...
 
Please, please, don't do this. Don't be that guy.

The cashier and the store clerks earn $15/hour, maybe. Please remember that.

The $300 you dropped on an iPhone 6 so you could save 5 seconds at the check stand does not entitle you to be a world-class prick.

Stop trying to make Apple Pay into a human rights issue.

The idiot Governor of my state actually went on record and said access to Wi-Fi is a human right. :rolleyes:
 
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

It's an automatic door, usually they don't hit you on the way out. Rite Aid at least still has those. Or are they going to say they don't need it either? After all there is no law requiring stores to use automatic doors either (like Apple Pay)
 
Buying a $600+ phone because of a feature that may or may not ever catch on is the epitome of foolishness.

Back in the day I had both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray players. Got a 400 dollar HD-DVD player for 120 on sale. 30 days later it was announced that hd-dvd was obsolete. I still have the player and the 3 movies I had bought for it. All collecting dust.

:eek:
 
I believe MCX is all about cutting VISA and MASTER CARD out of the picture by WALMART and their cronies. APPLE partnered with VISA and MC to create ApplePay so if the Walmart junta accepts it, they can't cut VISA and MC out and keep the transaction fees for themselves. My take for what is worth. WALMART has got one foot in the grave already. Now they are hacking off High-Demographic iPhone owners by not accepting ApplePay which is a "GREAT" idea on their part.

so, can I get some clarification?

Are they going to stop accepting Visa/MC and Bank debit in favor of this MCX system? Because I am not giving them access to my checking account to put in the cloud.....
 
Rite Aid working in PA

What the..... did you not read the article? It worked yesterday, but Rite Aid blocked it....

please read carefully!

I went to Rite Aid after reading the article to see if it was true and my prescription order went right through with Apple Pay, I had to explain to the Cashier what just happened and how it works. Then went next door to the AT&T store and told them that Apple Pay works at Rite Aid next door and at Panera Bread across the parking lot. I'm also one of those who upgraded from a 5s just to get Apple Pay without having to spend $350 for a watch in 2015.

For those of you who might have read my rant 2 weeks ago about having to wait 5-7 weeks for my iPhone 6 from AT&T and I said I was going to write a VP at AT&T and someone posted in the forum and said it was a waste of time that executives don't listen to customers. Maybe with other carriers but the management at AT&T are very service and customer aware this is the fourth time top level people have aided in a situation. Oh I got my iPhone 6, 4 days after sending the email. If I hadn't sent it I'd still be waiting until Nov 11.
 
Please, please, don't do this. Don't be that guy.

The cashier and the store clerks earn $15/hour, maybe. Please remember that.

The $300 you dropped on an iPhone 6 so you could save 5 seconds at the check stand does not entitle you to be a world-class prick.

Stop trying to make Apple Pay into a human rights issue.

The decision makers don't know or care about the cart that must be restocked. It just adds more work for overworked store employees. They have no say in this matter.
 
I think this is ridiculous Rite Aid would do that. Don't you want to make it easier for stuff to fly off your shelves with easier payments, instead of locking into one type of payment provider. But with that said, I think Apple is getting a taste of their own medicine. The "your with us or against us" mentality sometimes comes back to bite you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.