There's nothing idiotic about one window taking up an entire screen. Some things are just personal preferences. Personally, I don't like having maximized windows, but sometimes I do to keep myself from getting distracted.
It would be nice to have the option, but I don't see Apple doing it. If you want a full screen browser there are alternative browsers one can use.
Tab settings?
Tabs on top! Tabs on top! Tabs...on...TOP!!!
say bye-bye to Safari on PowerPC
There's that faux retort again, "I don't like to be distracted."
No need to take things so personally. I was more referring to having Windows in the background anyway. Distraction is entirely mental and if a fullscreened window keeps me from getting myself distracted, then no matter the psychology it has done its job.There's that faux retort again, "I don't like to be distracted."
It would be great if the zoom button worked the way its supposed to every time. I often encounter bugs when using it, where either my window will move or it doesn't enlarge big enough to encase all the content. Right now the button is useless to me.Apple's solution - Build a SMART window function that finds the optimal size for a window to display its contents without hogging up your display.
And nearly every other operating system including all (or nearly all) distros of Linux and Solaris. It's a standard computer function with OS X by itself. Most people don't even use the green button, because of its unpredictable nature.Microsoft's solution - Build a drone function that just blows the crap out of your window without any thought what-so-ever.
Windows = Yes
Mac (intel) = Yes
Mac (powerpc) = Unlikely
What benefits would PowerPC support bring? If it is supported it will be by version number only, as most of the rumored new features probably couldnt be supported anyway... including faster javascript (technically not possible on PowerPC platforms), developer tools, caching and dns pre-fetch are likely to be quite intensive.
There's that faux retort again, "I don't like to be distracted."
Oh me oh my, my desktop picture is just BEGGING to be looked at, averting my eyes from my original task at hand.
Bull. Your desktop is not possibly THAT interesting.
Apple's solution - Build a SMART window function that finds the optimal size for a window to display its contents without hogging up your display.
Microsoft's solution - Build a drone function that just blows the crap out of your window without any thought what-so-ever.
This is the typical nature of both companies.
Uh-huh. Now run along, go buy a display to dedicate to each window.
"With the Mac?" Then shouldn't you also say "At least with [the] Windows" XD
And XP? Doubt it.
Windows = Yes
Mac (intel) = Yes
Mac (powerpc) = Unlikely
What benefits would PowerPC support bring? If it is supported it will be by version number only, as most of the rumored new features probably couldnt be supported anyway... including faster javascript (technically not possible), developer tools, caching and dns pre-fetch are likely to be quite intensive.
You do know that XP to Win7 isn't what PPC is to Mac Intel?
It's totally irrelevant if Safari 5 will be released for XP or not. Safari compiled to run on Win7, it will also run on XP. But for Safari compiled to run on OS X Intel, won't run on PPC Macs.
Quite intensive? It's just browsing the web! As I said before in this thread, if Apple wants to push HTML5 they need to support it as well as they can on as many platforms as they can.
I suppose could keep Safari 5 for Win7 and 10.6, while releasing a minor bump for PPC and XP that just contains the HTML5 improvements.
What would it bring? Full screen support for HTML5.
It would be great if the zoom button worked the way its supposed to every time. I often encounter bugs when using it, where either my window will move or it doesn't enlarge big enough to encase all the content. Right now the button is useless to me.
And nearly every other operating system including all (or nearly all) distros of Linux and Solaris. It's a standard computer function with OS X by itself. Most people don't even use the green button, because of its unpredictable nature.
Sir, you have just become the first person on my ignore list. I find your way of taking things personally incredibly irritating.
I hope XCode 4 has at least:
* more refactoring tools
* hassle free debugging of unit tests
* optimize #imports functionality ( like Eclipse )
* Quick Fix ( like in Eclipse )
* less buggy!
* A decent plugin manager - for extensions
* Configurable code templates within XCode
* generate protocol methods in implementing class
With the entire Mac product base now on Intel... why would Apple waste its time implementing HTML 5 for a dead PowerPC product base?
Whether or not Apple have done so, will depend much of the architecture of Safari and webkit. Can they just tick the build for PowerPC box in Xcode? I dont really know much about that... Not impossible, but IMHO it would make Safari slower on the PowerPC and thus the user experience would not be so good.
IMHO it would make Safari slower on the PowerPC and thus the user experience would not be so good.
Extentions or GTFO.
I hope XCode 4 has at least:
* more refactoring tools
* hassle free debugging of unit tests
* optimize #imports functionality ( like Eclipse )
* Quick Fix ( like in Eclipse )
* less buggy!
* A decent plugin manager - for extensions
* Configurable code templates within XCode
* generate protocol methods in implementing class
I just think it would be kind of silly if a nine-year OS supported Apple's latest browser but Apple's own three-year old OS did not. Safari is compiled to run on intel machines in 64-bit mode, and there's also a 32 bit PPC version alongside it...so I'm not sure what your point is. Apple can easily support both versions.
Apple has never done that: multiple keynotes every single WWDC morning.This works. However, so much new stuff is rumored, my guess is that these launches are going to be done for a keynote each WWDC morning.