The problem debating technology with you is that you are not capable of understanding technological arguments.
I'm in IT. I can understand technology quite fine thank you. Otherwise, I'd be pretty piss poor at my job.
Actually, that's worse. There are many aspects of "better", one of which is being able to use the device. When the screen is too large, it falls out of convenient reach of your fingers, making it more difficult to use.
4.65" vs 3.5" isn't quite as big a jump as you make it seem (as far as fingers are concerned). The phone is barely 1 cm wider and 1.5 cm taller. Check both spec sheets on GSM Arena.
Further, beyond 300 dpi, increased pixel resolution provides no benefit because you cannot perceive it. Maybe making the screen larger drops the ppi down below 300, but that doesn't make it better, it makes it worse, and if it doesn't drop it below 300, then there's no advantage to higher resolution.
The PPI (not dpi) is above 300 and below the iPhone 4's 326. It's in the middle actually. So what's your point here ? Are you also blasting Apple ?
And yes, there's an added advantage of 1280x720 over 960x640. Watching 720p video at full resolution with no downscaling (not to mention the added real-estate on the screen).
Ok, this is a flat out lie. This tactic is from the days when everybody was using the same Intel chips. Then you could compare CPU models. But Apple makes their own CPUS, Apple doesn't reveal what's in them, and they are fairly proprietary.
Both the A5 and Exynos share a use of ARM's Cortex A9 design and benchmarks can be run on both to show which is faster (yes, platform independant benchmarks).
So, where's the voice-recognition engine in your androids CPU? Facial recognition CPU? Which standard tests have you submitted it to? And how do you compare it to the one in the iPhone 4s's A5? That would be pretty difficult since the 4S isn't shipping now, wouldn't it?
You can compare it to the faster A5 in the iPad 2 however. That even gives an edge to the A5 in the tests.
This is the kind of stuff that makes it obvious you're an automaton, an android. The reason Apple doesn't use OLED technology is the terrible performance outdoors, you know, where people spend a lot of their time. You're fronting an inferior technology as if it is better than other inferior technologies and completely ignoring that Apple is using the superior (but more expensive) technology.
You need to read up on SAMOLED+. It's not standard OLED.
Another lie, given that Android doesn't provide a unified storage system like iOS does. Thus, the expansion of android devices is pretty pointless since Apps can't' use that space.
Apps have been able to be stored on SD Cards since Android 2.2. Before that however, Apps could store data on SD Cards (even if the App itself needed to use internal storage).
So where did I lie ? Not to mention I made no statement as far as support was in Android (even though it's there), I made a mention of a phone spec. The phones provide an SD card slot for expansion of storage.
Which means less battery time. Oh, and you forgot to add: higher wattage components, less reliable software, designed with a focus on BS specs over usability, all of which add up to terrible battery performance, necessitating constantly replacing your battery.... and this is exacerbated by using a removable battery, which means a big chunk of the internal space goes to supporting this removable battery, meaning the battery itself is smaller.
Your opinion. If I want to use my battery life, I like the option of being able to. Listening to some of you, it seems you'd rather have Apple ship you a bricked device that doesn't boot, that way it has the best battery life there is! (infinity. Can't use battery if you can't turn on the device).
This is how I know you're speaking from ignorance and have never used an iPhone.
Wait, now you're telling me what phone I don't own ? Sorry, been using an iPhone 3GS since September 2009. I have it right here next to me.
I'm done. Obviously, this debate is going to be endless and one-sided, filled with insults towards me. I'd rather just ignore your posts.