The Android fanboys say this every year and yet it never seems to come true.
Well, considering they are announcing a device that pretty much destroys the iPhone 4S on every spec (you can get a preview by looking at the SGS II HD announced in Korea just a few weeks ago), with an updated OS that iOS still has to catch up to, with features Apple can only dream of (Google Wallet/NFC) and they were doing it 2 days before the launch of the iPhone 4S... Yeah I'd say it was a move to steal Apple's thunder.
I hate to belittle the possibility of these companies doing something "nice" but to me it all sounds like, "this is a great excuse for delaying our release while we work like crazy to "catch-up" or put together a better product to actually compete with Apple's new phone. All the while making ourselves look good."
This is not respect - it's politics and PR.
This isn't about them having respect for Steve's death. People are deluding themselves if they believe that because there is too much money involved. It's likely they're waiting for the news of his death not dominate the tech news industry.
haha yeah so true... I'm not a Android fanboy. I always had iPhones, but this year I might change to Android, cause I don't like the iPhone 4 design, and now my friend look at this and cry:
Nexus Prime Specs:
Ultra Thin
4.65-inch Super AMOLED screen
Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
4G LTE Radio Ready
1gb of RAM
1.5 GHz Dual Core Processor
1080p HD Video
2 and 8 mp Camera
Wifi IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n
This isn't about them having respect for Steve's death. People are deluding themselves if they believe that because there is too much money involved. It's likely they're waiting for the news of his death not dominate the tech news industry.
The problem debating technology with you is that you are not capable of understanding technological arguments.
It's like trying to talk to a Ford or Chevy fan about the specifics of electronic ignition, when all they care about is how many cylinders the car has.
So, I'm going to rebut you, but I know you're an android. You're just regurgitating things you've heard but don't understand. I'm not going to debate you, because debate would require a human opponent, capable of reasoning. Any response from you will merely be proof that you're incapable of comprehending actual technical arguments. (because if you were, you'd either be quieted by reading this, and you wouldn't have made your post in the first place.)
Actually, that's worse. There are many aspects of "better", one of which is being able to use the device. When the screen is too large, it falls out of convenient reach of your fingers, making it more difficult to use.
Further, beyond 300 dpi, increased pixel resolution provides no benefit because you cannot perceive it. Maybe making the screen larger drops the ppi down below 300, but that doesn't make it better, it makes it worse, and if it doesn't drop it below 300, then there's no advantage to higher resolution.
Ok, this is a flat out lie. This tactic is from the days when everybody was using the same Intel chips. Then you could compare CPU models. But Apple makes their own CPUS, Apple doesn't reveal what's in them, and they are fairly proprietary.
So, where's the voice-recognition engine in your androids CPU? Facial recognition CPU? Which standard tests have you submitted it to? And how do you compare it to the one in the iPhone 4s's A5? That would be pretty difficult since the 4S isn't shipping now, wouldn't it?
Thought so.
This is the kind of stuff that makes it obvious you're an automaton, an android. The reason Apple doesn't use OLED technology is the terrible performance outdoors, you know, where people spend a lot of their time. You're fronting an inferior technology as if it is better than other inferior technologies and completely ignoring that Apple is using the superior (but more expensive) technology.
Another lie, given that Android doesn't provide a unified storage system like iOS does. Thus, the expansion of android devices is pretty pointless since Apps can't' use that space.
Which means less battery time. Oh, and you forgot to add: higher wattage components, less reliable software, designed with a focus on BS specs over usability, all of which add up to terrible battery performance, necessitating constantly replacing your battery.... and this is exacerbated by using a removable battery, which means a big chunk of the internal space goes to supporting this removable battery, meaning the battery itself is smaller.
This is how I know you're speaking from ignorance and have never used an iPhone. That's the thing- you guys buy crap, like windows, and you only ever use crap, so you assume that the iPhone is crap as well.
Android doesn't have Siri, or any of the other "little things" Apple has invented and patented over the past years. Of course, android stole Apple's multi-touch technology, and your phone will be removed from the market in due course as a result....but even with Apple publishing patents your favored rip-off artists can't copy the technology fast enough to keep up.
Android has a poor notification mechanism, and has never been ahead in this regard. This is another feature that android stole from the iPhone, but you lot, knowing nothing about even recent history, delude yourself into thinking that it was originated with android.
Same thing with multi-tasking. The original iPhone-- a year before any android phone shipped-- was multi-tasking. And I mean, true, pre-emptive, multitasking. This has been a feature of the phone since the beginning, since the phone runs a modern operating system (OS X) and has had that feature since the 1980s.
Apple limits apps ability to run in the background for performance. The number one complaint of android users, and the reason android phones have a %25 return rate, is terrible battery performance. And one of the reasons the battery is terrible is all those pointless background apps. Apple lets you run in the background where you need it... not for stupid stuff.
Here, your ignorance of basic technology has you claiming the defect in your preferred platform is a feature!
Siri, to mention. But then, your entire basis of understanding is to pretend like the iPhone is just another feature phone like android.
It isn't. It's a smartphone.
You post a picture of an obvious iPhone ripoff and act as if its original? Seriously?
Every touch phone on the market is a counterfeit iPhone. EVERY SINGLE ONE.
This is the right thing to do, but it's also a really good business decision. The news this week is about the passing of Steve Jobs. If you release ANYTHING you'll be lucky to be page 2 news. It's classy, but it's also shrewd. Double win for Google/Samsung.
All the while the "respect" goes on, in a lab in Korea...
Samsung updates the Nexus Prime to actually have a chance of matching the specs of the 4S (e.g. better camera)
Cry for what? A list of specs you don't even know it's true?
Get a life.
I'm no Android fan but you're wrong in many places-
1. SAMOLED is better than LCD for outdoor.
2. There's an app called App2SD which can send apps from phone to SD card.
3. Honestly iOS5 notifications look a lot like Android's.
Nice, but I don't think etiquette required that. Maybe there was a lot of anti-Apple marketing / rhetoric involved in the original plans?
The slideshows and graphics they pass on to "independent fan-run blogs" (but curiously all dependent on Google ad revenue)
You do realize the Galaxy SII already meets or exceeds most of the iPhone 4S already right?
haha yeah so true... I'm not a Android fanboy. I always had iPhones, but this year I might change to Android, cause I don't like the iPhone 4 design, and now my friend look at this and cry:
Nexus Prime Specs:
Ultra Thin--4S the same
4.65-inch Super AMOLED screen--a few pixels don't mean much
Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)-- Never been a fan of linux
4G LTE Radio Ready--Have fun with that 2GB cap
1gb of RAM- Android needs that much
1.5 GHz Dual Core Processor--The A5 smokes that
1080p HD Video- 4S has the same
2 and 8 mp Camera- 4S has the same
Wifi IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n--4S has the same
We'll see.... if the specs are correct, then it will blow the 4S !! Sorry, but I am right
And **** up lil boy!!
The Sun newspaper for me in its editorial summed it up for me "Half the world has his products and the other half craves them"
Steve revolutionised film, he revolutionised music, he revolutionised computing, he revolutionised the way we listen to music, the way we browse the net, Steve literally touched all of our lives in the case of many people without them even realising it, hardly anyone I have spoken to this last couple of days knew that Steve was the man behind Toy Story and cars, hardly anyone I know knew that we would all be entering command prompts today but for Steve, hardly anyone knew that the internet was created on one of Steve's computers.
It is a shame Steve is not a catholic if he was he would be a prime case for beatification.
I hate to belittle the possibility of these companies doing something "nice" but to me it all sounds like, "this is a great excuse for delaying our release while we work like crazy to "catch-up" or put together a better product to actually compete with Apple's new phone. All the while making ourselves look good."
This is not respect - it's politics and PR.
The problem debating technology with you is that you are not capable of understanding technological arguments.
No it doesn't. The 4S kicks the SII in graphics perf and the camera is much better (wider aperture, better optics)