Samsung always gains the upper hand over Apple with its spring phone releases. I don't know why Cupertino doesn't bring the iPhone launch date forward...
Is there a point, though? A loyal iPhone user won't suddenly switch to the Sammy or vice-versa. People may switch if they don't harbor brand loyalty and don't mind switching between ecosystems every year or other year.
And then what happens in September? WHAM!
I dumped Crackberry for Android because Blackberry weren't moving with the times. And by the time they did it was too little too late. We're discussing a mature phone user base now, not something that happened a decade ago.Crackberry people switched pretty quickly nothing sticky about the average iphone user once perceived better comes along. Apls users always talk about stickiness, its really they don't care for android and they stay.That will change one day one day soon.
No wham..meh after the more than 6 month build up. I think wham may be on a different co.
NOPEanyone else bothered by the stupid curved corners on the display? feels like it would look nicer if they just made the corners flat, almost making the corners disappear to the left and right edges
One could argue successfully iPhone is the same, 10yo UI ,still no wireless charging, proprietary inferior connectors, expensive apps/movies, super expensive devices..list goes onI dumped Crackberry for Android because Blackberry weren't moving with the times. And by the time they did it was too little too late. We're discussing a mature phone user base now, not something that happened a decade ago.
Maybe just maybe Apple will totally revamp the iPhone 8 like they did the Macbook Pro lineI really don't like the rounded/cut corners of the actual screen. I really hope Apple doesn't do this.
First prove it didn't have bezels in the first placeThe aquous was copied, no matter of spin will change that.
They all still looked like iPhones to me.
You can't set non Apple apps as default so once you tap on a link related to a particular app it will direct you to install the app instead of using the third party app already on the phone. This leaves me incapable of uninstalling the app if I wasn't to use my phone seamlesslyWhat compulsion?
It doesn't matter, Sharp started it. Little variations are basically copying according to definitions here.First prove it didn't have bezels in the first place
They all look like an iphone, even if the dimensions change slightly.The iPhone 6 handles and looks very different from the 5s. In fact many feel the 5s was the classic jewellery iPhone design while the current design is not that unique
Doesn't answer the question.You can't set non Apple apps as default so once you tap on a link related to a particular app it will direct you to install the app instead of using the third party app already on the phone. This leaves me incapable of uninstalling the app if I wasn't to use my phone seamlessly
Apple would first have to stop earning $75B in a quarter.One could argue successfully iPhone is the same, 10yo UI ,still no wireless charging, proprietary inferior connectors, expensive apps/movies, super expensive devices..list goes on
Look if Surface Pocket redefines mobile, iOS=rim and history repeats
How do you know exactly what display Apple is using?
Apple would first have to stop earning $75B in a quarter.
Because it is known exactly who is supplying apple with what and the numbers involved?Uh because they are the only relevant supplier of OLED in business . Even the Pixel uses Samsung OLED. I would almost put money on iPhone 8 having an OLED display and reduced bezels. Samsung also knows what the iPhone 8 is bringing because they are supplying the panels for it. The only question is whether the yield will be high enough for a curved edge display or will it be an standard OLED
Holy rotten to the core Batman. Okay I kid. $50B in a quarter is certainly bankruptcy territory for apple. /s So $75B + 50B = $125B in two quarters. Okay then.Don't worry that will happen,at -risk apl user create daily
their "guidance ' is like $51B so it'll happen soon
So even Sharp copied. Phones have been reducing bezel size even before the Aquos released. Sharp simply executed a variation of it. So in the end Samsung and Apple copied themselves hereIt doesn't matter, Sharp started it. Little variations are basically copying according to definitions here.
They all look like an iphone, even if the dimensions change slightly.
Doesn't answer the question.
[doublepost=1488425606][/doublepost]
Apple would first have to stop earning $75B in a quarter.
Because it is known exactly who is supplying apple with what and the numbers involved?
LOLOLOL.They launched the curved screen display because they were the only company that actually could, technologically. It was true innovation -
There is always someone that does something first is the point. Others make variations on a theme. Look at the auto industry for an example.So even Sharp copied. Phones have been reducing bezel size even before the Aquos released. Sharp simply executed a variation of it. So in the end Samsung and Apple copied themselves here
They still all look like an iphone is the point. Just like a BMW looks like a BMW for the last 50 years.They only look similar from the front. Then back and the sides are a night and day difference. Both designs are also unique in their handling
The definition of "bloat" has morphed a bit from the original defintion and has become any app I/you/we don't want. Apple let's you uninstall a bunch of apps and you'll save a couple of bytes here an there.It's called bloat because you cannot truly uninstall Apple's apps and use the phone. On Android when I uninstall I am never reminded of Google's apps ever again. Now that's called an uninstall
You mean rumors. But one still doesn't know the exact parts and from which manufacturers.Didn't multiple leaks already confirm Samsung as the prime supplier ? It doesn't matter anyway because if you want to use OLED there is no large scale manufacturing alternative other than Samsung
I wasn't suggesting the iPhone is great. It has quite a lot of flaws. People aren't willing to admit flaws on a phone for some reason.One could argue successfully iPhone is the same, 10yo UI ,still no wireless charging, proprietary inferior connectors, expensive apps/movies, super expensive devices..list goes on
Look if Surface Pocket redefines mobile, iOS=rim and history repeats
I wasn't suggesting the iPhone is great. It has quite a lot of flaws. People aren't willing to admit flaws on a phone for some reason.
Anyway, an iPhone and a Samsung walk into a bar. The barkeep smirks at them and asks what they'll be having. Both say a shot of Irish whisky. Barkeep says there's only enough for a single ounce shot. Both phones get into it. The iPhone suggests they duel. Both get up from their stools and walk 10 paces from each other. The Samsung phone starts laughing. Menacingly. The iPhone asks what's wrong with him. The Samsung says "I'm no ordinary Samsung. I'm a Note 7!" Before the barkeep and the iPhone can run away, the Samsung opens his coat and the battery within explodes, killing everyone in the bar.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. I agreed with your initial post. Apple's a stale "technology" company. They care more about quarterly profits than delivering a vastly superior product like they did years ago. Nowhere did I suggest Apple were the next RIM, or that they're better than their competitors. Because frankly, they're not and never will be at the rate they're going. The best thing Apple knows to do is to piss off long time customers and charge more money because they all know one a schmuck always a schmuck who's willing to spend $900+ on their inferior product.How does that change iOS =rim? Samsung will be back.