Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As a long-time iPhone user (7 years), I am really saddened by this news. Competition is what pushes industry innovation, and it's sad to see a major competitor's product fail on such an epic scale. Hopefully Samsung gets their act together and we return to a healthy competitive balance soon.

On the flip side, maybe Samsung's fail is the making of Google's Pixel? One can hope.[/QUOTE]

Pixel is probably one of the smartest moves Google has made in a while and that should be enough to make Tim sweat like a pig. It shows that Google has their stuff together.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/google-enters-hardware-op-ed/

It's the first big step and given time, the competition between them and Apple will get very interesting. Not to forget that Microsoft is about to release a new all in one Surface PC ( not the hybrid tablet ) soon in the near future between this year or early 2017 and I've seen some of the patented diagrams which looks like something Apple should have done a long time ago with their iMac line up.
 
I don't want to be in the .01%, do you?

You're missing the point as are many here who are diluting the original argument. Samsung has done everything to rectify the issue, yet so many here do nothing but point fingers and place blame on them, including saying they have done criminal things and should be behind bars. No one wants to be the 0.01 percent of owners whose phones catch fire, but the question was why Note 7 owners continue to keep their phones, and my point was that the risk is still pretty low.
 
You're missing the point as are many here who are diluting the original argument. Samsung has done everything to rectify the issue, yet so many here do nothing but point fingers and place blame on them, including saying they have done criminal things and should be behind bars. No one wants to be the 0.01 percent of owners whose phones catch fire, but the question was why Note 7 owners continue to keep their phones, and my point was that the risk is still pretty low.

By replacing dangerous phones with...other dangerous phones :oops:

Once is a mistake, twice is inexcusable.
 
You're missing the point as are many here who are diluting the original argument. Samsung has done everything to rectify the issue, yet so many here do nothing but point fingers and place blame on them, including saying they have done criminal things and should be behind bars. No one wants to be the 0.01 percent of owners whose phones catch fire, but the question was why Note 7 owners continue to keep their phones, and my point was that the risk is still pretty low.
It's like playing Russian Roulette with a 10,000 shot revolver.

Who WOULDN'T want to do that?

Right?
 
What ever floats your boat and gets you through the day.
Bottom line, Samsung made a F'd phone, they screwed the first recall, they have a F'd up public image, "some carriers" have lost faith in the phone, the public has lost faith in the phone and now it appears they faulty replacements.
In their rush to beat the iPhone 7 (whatever happened to the Note 6? :rolleyes:) it appears they rushed out the Note 7 and now its a flaming success. :rolleyes:
At the end of the day, history will write Samsung F'd up.

Same to you.

I'll let you know by the end of today if history wrote that. ;)
 
I just sold my 6 Plus but in the 2 years I had it it was dependple I never had this Touch disease.
 
You're missing the point as are many here who are diluting the original argument. Samsung has done everything to rectify the issue, yet so many here do nothing but point fingers and place blame on them, including saying they have done criminal things and should be behind bars. No one wants to be the 0.01 percent of owners whose phones catch fire, but the question was why Note 7 owners continue to keep their phones, and my point was that the risk is still pretty low.
No, you're missing the point! Those stats were when they thought they had the issue contained. Obviously, they don't as the replacement devices seem to be just as prone to this failure. Stop throwing out the .01 metric - it's meaningless!

No-one with one of these should feel safe with it in their homes - at least three of the 5 reported devices weren't plugged in at the time. Completely spontaneous. I wouldn't want one in my home.
 
It's like playing Russian Roulette with a 10,000 shot revolver.

Who WOULDN'T want to do that?

Right?

Apparently people who are willing to keep using their Note 7's...
[doublepost=1476106929][/doublepost]
No, you're missing the point! Those stats were when they thought they had the issue contained. Obviously, they don't as the replacement devices seem to be just as prone to this failure. Stop throwing out the .01 metric - it's meaningless!

No-one with one of these should feel safe with it in their homes - at least three of the 5 reported devices weren't plugged in at the time. Completely spontaneous. I wouldn't want one in my home.

So you didn't really read a word I wrote, did you?
 
You call it deflection, I call it putting the "crisis" into perspective.

Here is a great article describing the Note 7 battery issue and why it happens. It states that 0.01 percent of all Note 7's are susceptible.
If Samsung sold 5 million (probably would be much higher if they didn't stop sales), then that means 50,000 phones would be affected! That's HUGE. Can you imagine how much property damage and injury that would cause? Samsung would be fighting lawsuits for years, face humongous fines, and suffer a tremendous loss in brand loyalty. It would cost them tens of billions.

I know you want to tell yourself that other phones are just as bad, but when government agencies are banning them, carriers stop selling them, and Samsung itself ceases manufacturing them, you know it has to be something bigger.
 
snip...Samsung has done everything to rectify the issue, ...
Yet reports are still rolling in of flaming fireballs, so it begs the question, "Have they really?"
snip... yet so many here do nothing but point fingers and place blame on them,...
Who else are you gonna place the blame on? Its their phone.
I guess if you want to get extreme, you can fault Apple and the iPhone.
Without the iPhone 7 imminent release, Samsung would never have needed to rush the N7 (strange, no Note 6:eek:) to market as no other Android manufacturer comes close.
 
Assuming you have a smartphone (probably an iPhone), can you please explain why you continue to use your smartphone, in light of what is happening to Note 7 owners, knowing that your smartphone has a large Li ion battery in it similar to the Note 7, with the same capability to "explode"? Don't we all take a chance, carrying around smartphones and portable chargers with even larger Li ion batteries, knowing these batteries are highly "explosive", yet we choose to continue to use them?

How is that any different than Note 7 owners that choose to continue to keep theirs? iPhones have caught fire in the past, but people (you?) continue to use them...
As a Note7 owner, I appreciate your pointing out that there are inherent risks to ALL devices that contain Lithium ion batteries. We need to get the word out to our friends and families about the dangers of using damaged cell phones. I know many families who have children using hand me down iPhones with very busted up chassis. You can be sure now that I myself have gotten a crash course in the dangers of lithium ion batteries, I'll be warning them. Even then, I am pretty sure most won't listen, unfortunately, because most of the time nothing has come of it, so far. People have been using busted up iPhones and iPads for a few years now. Which is why we have on occasion, isolated reports of iPhones combusting. It seems more apparent now with the thinner models with the bigger batteries that mean greater risk.

However, in the case of the Note7, there's a known problem that could be sleeping silently within any of these Note7s. In credible reports (acknowledging not all of them are) there was no warning and nothing unusual leading up to the explosions. Even taking into account the small statistical probability of any one person having a Note 7 explode on them, the hazards are too great to risk especially on a known problem that can easily be avoided by turning in these possible defective and potentially lethal models.

If you have ever seen a friend's house burn to the ground, as I have, you will know there is no justification for taking on this risk. The Note 7 is a fabulous amazing device and it really pains me to turn mine in. My husband absolutely does not want to. But we love our health, home and family and if there's a known risk, we are avoiding it. The phones are going back to AT&T.
 
Assuming you have a smartphone (probably an iPhone), can you please explain why you continue to use your smartphone, in light of what is happening to Note 7 owners, knowing that your smartphone has a large Li ion battery in it similar to the Note 7, with the same capability to "explode"? Don't we all take a chance, carrying around smartphones and portable chargers with even larger Li ion batteries, knowing these batteries are highly "explosive", yet we choose to continue to use them?
Because we are rational people. Each individual event might appear completely random, but the problem is not randomly distributed over all smartphones. At the moment the risk is highly concentrated on Note 7 devices, given the number of reports probably 100 to 1000x higher (reports of incidents per shipped device for the Note 7 vs the same number for other smartphones). So far (last decade or two) these problems have mostly been production batch-based, though this time it might be product design-based.

A production batch problem can arise anywhere, anytime, though it is more likely when a product design enters mass production. Ditto for a product design problem, except for the latter, the risk diminishes to very, very small levels after, let's say the first couple of weeks of sales of a new product.

In a sense there are two separate risk factors: 1) You have a product that is affected by design or manufacturing issues and 2) you are unfortunate enough to have the 1:10'000 to 1:100'000 chance of having your phone (coming from the affected batch) that actually does burst into flames.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
How's the Apple Watch doing? Oh wait. It just got banned in the UK for security reasons just recently. Google it.

The Apple Watch was banned by the Prime Minister from her cabinet meetings. Not the whole of the UK.

The ban actually applies to all smart watches. But do you know what? The media didn't bother mentioning any Android Wear devices in the headlines because they have no brand recognition.

The only smartwatch a majority of the population knows is Apple Watch.

I'd say Apple Watch is doing very well.
 
I think Samsung blamed this on faulty batteries while I thing the problem is is more than that.
It may have to do with the circuit design and casing which is why the replacements also caught on fire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
You call it deflection, I call it putting the "crisis" into perspective.

Here is a great article describing the Note 7 battery issue and why it happens. It states that 0.01 percent of all Note 7's are susceptible.

Ok, so now you believe an unnamed Samsung official...despite being told by the COO that the replacement phones aren't susceptible? I think you need to take some time to reflect.
 
So you didn't really read a word I wrote, did you?
Fine, you really want to feel like a tool, I'll directly quote you:
"Samsung has done everything to rectify the issue"
Umm, no, they didn't get to root cause on the issue and irresponsibly issued replacement devices which were just as prone to the failure as the first issued devices.

"but the question was why Note 7 owners continue to keep their phones, and my point was that the risk is still pretty low."
On what basis are you making that claim? The manufacturer of the devices doesn't have a handle on the problem, so how the hell do you think you do?
No-one knows what the failure rate is yet, as there hasn't been definitive root cause published. I'd expect that information to (eventually) be coming from the battery manufacturer, though Samsung will likely be the one to issue it in a press release.
Until root cause is identified, you can't state what the failure rate is and what the risk is to anyone that still has one of these handsets.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Beck Show
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.