Read the article. Says the device was plugged into an improper port. Also doesn’t definitively say an Apple device was the cause. The people suing are just taking aim at those with the deepest pockets, whether it’s true or not.
Read the article. Says the device was plugged into an improper port. Also doesn’t definitively say an Apple device was the cause. The people suing are just taking aim at those with the deepest pockets, whether it’s true or not.
When your main sales argument is to discredit others, it is that your company is not doing well....
I know I mentioned this. I’ve never seen any of these ads over here. Only ones I’ve seen is where Samsung Just advertises the phone. No mention of Apple. I thought these were just Internet ads but they apparently air in the US.It’s interesting in the fact such adverts never seem to air in the UK (as an example).
Each device has it’s own merits and each device also has it’s own weaknesses.
Different people have different needs; I, like a lot of others, go for what works for me.
Apple still sells the iPhone SE, a 2 year old phone that cost $400 2 years ago. Phones usually get a $100 discount each year at retail, so Apple is basically selling a $200 iPhone with $150 Apple tax.
Shows how paranoid they are about Apple
And yet for some reason these ads found there way into an article on a PRO-APPLE site. Seed has been planted.
This is true, but you can show that strength and still make a small dig at the competition without trying to make the competition look like *******s. Even that "you're a barista" crap was demeaning to Apple's users. I seriously doubt Samsung would play these kinds of ads in South Korea.
Hm I just assumed these are world wide ads.
When your main sales argument is to discredit others, it is that your company is not doing well....
Not quite. Samsung is the one implying that the lack of a headphone jack is a BIG negative. Having presented that as their argument, they now have to offer proof, because it's not obvious (as, for example, a bad battery life would be). The same would be true if I said your screen name lacks a "Z" and is therefore inferior. I've stated a fact (it lacks a "Z") but it's up to me to now prove that makes it inferior. It's not up to you to prove me wrong, even if you could do so easily. I made the assertion, so I'm the one who has to put-up or shut-up.Apple would need to tell us what these advantages are because all they said was courage.
People always compared these to the Mac vs PC ads. They are not the same, even though on the face of it they are both comparison videos. One compares two products and the other compares customers. This is along the lines of those terrible "basically" Mac genius ads Apple made back in 2012. These kinds of ads insults the customer base of the other company and implies that people are stupid and buys into a products simply because they are uninformed sheep. Some people like both brands, and they are more likely to switch around every few years, but these ads will just alienate those customers.
I think the more pertinent question is: Will Samsung ever make as big a profit on their phones as Apple?Apple will NEVER sell as many phones as Samsung.
Pops would have known that that counts for any human behaviour. When your focus lies on the competition, you forget to aim at your own goal. When you reserve your critical awareness ro the acts of others, you lose critical self awareness and show a lack of self esteem.Pops was in advertising, and always said that when an ad is comparing itself to another to buy the other. The ad's manufacture is admitting the other is the best and they are trying to come up to that standard.
If one day they can innovate and not copy. If they never did until now, why would one question if one day they would... It’s a cultural thing, and therefore predictable.I think the more pertinent question is: Will Samsung ever make as big a profit on their phones as Apple?
I haven't forgotten them. And if Samsung's commercials are ever as fun and witty as those, then I'll give them the props they deserve for them. But it seems to me that they're falling down in copying those commercials just as they've always fallen down in copying Apple's phones.Everyone here clearly forgot the "I'm a mac, I'm a pc" commercial campaign. Lol
Probably not the best argument here - Samsung is valued at over $407 billion.When your main sales argument is to discredit others, it is that your company is not doing well....
When your main sales argument is to discredit others, it is that your company is not doing well....
Those ads didn’t only take shots at Windows. They used the benefits of the Mac to naturally put down Windows.I’m a Mac, and I’m a PC...
Wasn’t that long ago.