Doesn't matter if you have synthetic benchmarks of a super computer when it's still running a dumb OS that still doesn't allow placing app icons anywhere on home screen, can't swipe away and do something else during incoming call, doesn't have proper background multitasking, doesn't have VP9 (YouTube) hardware decoding, no split screen multitasking, no precision pen input, etc.
As if Qualcomm hasn't poured millions and millions into R&D for their own chips? The only difference here is Samsung is sourcing their silicon. I don't fully disagree with the statement, because I love Apple's hardware and software, but regardless of how much Apple has devoted to their R&D, the real-world use will vary very little from device-to-device this day regardless of OS. In the end, I'd take Apple's chip engineered in-house and optimized hand-in-hand with the software any day, but benchmarks are what they are, raw numbers. They are not indicative of the experience various users will have, and in 2018, the experiences will be mostly negligible.
Oh, is it aluminum or glass that looks like plastic? Even worse then LOLPlastic where???
Interesting that everyone I know with an MBA is failing or barely making it in business. It's the college drop-outs that are successful business-wise.This ad is a standard upward attack strategy used by anybody who has studied marketing or has earned an MBA.
Pepsi has used this strategy against Coke countless times.
Once again, Marketing 101.
Interesting that everyone I know with an MBA is failing or barely making it in business. It's the college drop-outs that are successful business-wise.
It looks the same like any iphone (in terms of finish). Accept it or not, that does not change the truth.Oh, is it aluminum or glass that looks like plastic? Even worse then LOL
Look I'm not anti-Apple here, I love the company and literally just said I'd take their chip all day, but do you want me to go pull the Antutu benchmark where the $530 OnePlus 6 beats the iPhone X using a Snapdragon 845 that isn't water-cooled? Again, the differences here are going to be negligible in real-world use.Difference is Apple knows what hardware it’s going into. If Snapdragon made a phone with optimized version of android it wouldn’t need these extra cooling features and other nonesense. Apple knows the entire line, so the chip is perfect for what it eventually is used in.
And despite snapdragons R&D the consensus since the 64bit A7 has seemed to be that Apple is a year ahead.
Look I'm not anti-Apple here, I love the company and literally just said I'd take their chip all day, but do you want me to go pull the Antutu benchmark where the $530 OnePlus 6 beats the iPhone X using a Snapdragon 845 that isn't water-cooled? Again, the differences here are going to be negligible in real-world use.
What a predictable (and lame) rebuttal. You're missing the point, so I'll just end the debate here.I would certainly hope a 2018 flagship could compete with a 2017 one.
What a predictable (and lame) rebuttal. You're missing the point, so I'll just end the debate here.
Pretty funny considering the Note 9 still can't outperform the year old iPhone X. And yes, nobody wants a stylus for a phone. Samsung should focus more on their failing sales than Apple.
Haha that's fine, I do the same. To be fair, we might be closer to being on the same page than we think because I definitely agree Apple is ahead of the curve.Look at the rest. The advancements in chip tech have helped Apple in more than just speed. I have a habit of not finishing my thoughts before I post.
But but but the radio commercial said the Galaxy S9 was the fastest smartphone ever this has to be fake news /sMore powerful huh?View attachment 775289
Look at the rest. The advancements in chip tech have helped Apple in more than just speed. I have a habit of not finishing my thoughts before I post.
x1000And most importantly Samsung should focus getting software updates out sooner than the release of their next phone.
Pathetic. Childish. Grasping at straws.
How embarrassing for Samsung.