The resolution is consistent with Galaxy S20s as well, I mean it's not like it's dropping below Samsung's 1080p claim or anything. That would indeed be bad.I mean that my iPad Pro has 2732-by-2048-pixel resolution... that is the resolution whether it is running at a default 120hz as I smoothly slide from screen to screen, or through pictures- or whether it has lowered the refresh rate to save battery, while I’m viewing a static screen for extended periods of time. There is no resolution “trickery” going on. The resolution is constant.
This is fundamentally different than Samsung’s 120hz implementation, which is NOT default (default is half that), & to ramp up to the normal iPad Pro refresh rate, Samsung’s method must 1st decrease the resolution.
Anyway the S20 is a phone the ipad is a tablet. A very important detail.
Having a 120Hz Amoled display it's an achievement in itself(only the niche Rog Phone 2 was able to use such a display) so I don't see what's so bad about the fact that Samsung decided to balance the impact such a feature would have on battery.
Also in Samsung's case the refresh rate will also be adjusted based on context so it will be lowered in order to save battery in situations and apps where high refresh rate doesn't make sense or it's not necessary.