Marketshare % got wider YOY for the quarter.
A much better comparison how and for whom? Forum members. The analytics firms really don't release these reports for our consumption. They're trying to drum up subscribers
No they are not ....thrust me, and if someone tells you they are, they are lying and don't want to hurt your feeling.
They might have been funny the very first time, but I am not even sure about that.
On topic, as someone else posted selling more does not mean making more money, sometimes is better to sell "less" but enjoy a better income, after all once you are at the top there is only one way you can go, and Apple right now can go either down or UP!!!
It's pretty stupid to claim that Apple copied "Copy and Paste" from Google and Samsung, when Apple had copy & paste implementations 35 years ago.Ironically, Apple actually copied the "Copy and Paste" implementation from Google/Samsung. Remember original iPhone didn't have Copy/Paste ?
It's the combination that's the killer. If Apple wasn't there, Samsung would have a chance in the high end market. Apple and Huawei/Xaiomi coming from both sides is what's killing Samsung.Apple is not Samsungs problem... Huawei and Xaiomi are. It's a race to the bottom on the Android side of the house.
Well maybe those Feld&Volk models that are covered in gold and diamondsNo iPhone ever produced will rival a rolls Royce product , even if Tim himself hand builds it .... Let alone slapped together in China.
That report typically follows this one within a week or two every quarter. Has for years.Generally speaking. Yes, for you, me, and everyone else interested in Sales figures between the two companies.
You seem to be taking this very personally.You still #2. #1 still is Samsung. Your lovely apple needs Samsung for displays and memory chips for its Itrash iphones. Samsung sells everything from flagship to low range phones. MY NOTE 5 kicks iphones ass all day
I am still trying to decide if this is a joke.In fact when I see an iPhone user, I imagine someone who is older and not teach savy, like a grandma or a teenager. Or some poor guy who drives a beat up Toyota Corolla and owns a pink iPhone 6S. I associate galaxy S6 with a guy in a suite that screams "style" and "sophistication"
Ignorance implies there is no truth to it.
The "inferior product" is just meaningless, and I'll give credit that Apple is not producing inferior products.
But when a company can boast record profit after record profit, and Very high profit margins (Much higher than the industry standards). Then you look at their financials and their future growth does not even touch most of those profits, which are being stockpiled overseas and out of local economies, while paying their elite level isnane amonuts of money that is virtually unheard of in the world, you have to seriously question whether or not the value you are getting is worth it. Some people think so, (and nothing wrong with that), but eventually you start to feel like you are being taxed by a few very rich people, purely for their benefit.
Lets say, using hypothetical numbers for calculation point;
Apple profit for the year was 50 Billion. So Next year, they grow costs by 30 Billion, then redistribute the rest of that to shareholders and bank a little. It wouldn't feel hinky.
But whats happening:
Apple makes 50 Billion in profit. Does not significantly change costs in future years. Takes 45 bILLION of that and puts it in the banks. and distributes 5 billion to a few dozen people.
Does THAT make you feel better that 45% of that device you spent is going towards that? Does that benefit YOU as a Apple fan? Even Fanboys should be looking at that profiteering questionably. Apple could afford to drop prices by 20% and still be raking in billions in profit, that far exceeds future growth plans, AND cost predictions.
And in other news, Toyota outsells the F150.
Precisely. I've been a "tech head" for a long time, and the longer it goes, I realize I want tech to simply work and get out of my way. I don't want to have to manage crap all the time. The reason I use Apple hardware is the integration and consistency. Period. Things like iCloud Backup, Time Machine, Keychain, Handoff, and various other seemingly small things make my life easier, and are difficult if not impossible to replicate on other platforms. Microsoft may be getting there but that's an entirely different subject.Which is funny, because I know more about electronics and tech than any Andriod user I know. Out of people in my main close group of friends, 3/4 of us who build PCs use iPhones. The current CEO and several directors of the commuter railroad I work for all chose iPhones.
I also dont see what "think different" has to do with it. It's not like people are choosing the S6 because they find it advantagous. I don't think choosing something solely because it's different was what Apple meant. I can choose to walk around with a 10 year old Nokia if my goal is to just look different. Note the "think" part of the quote. If you compared the differences between the two phones and saw advantages that everyone else doesn't see or you were proud of your preference to one device, that'd be one thing and more in line of what "think different" means.
Choosing something just to look cool just comes across as someone who only cares about shallow BS.
Precisely. I've been a "tech head" for a long time, and the longer it goes, I realize I want tech to simply work and get out of my way. I don't want to have to manage crap all the time. The reason I use Apple hardware is the integration and consistency. Period. Things like iCloud Backup, Time Machine, Keychain, Handoff, and various other seemingly small things make my life easier, and are difficult if not impossible to replicate on other platforms. Microsoft may be getting there but that's an entirely different subject.
It's pretty stupid to claim that Apple copied "Copy and Paste" from Google and Samsung, when Apple had copy & paste implementations 35 years ago.
yes. Apple's distributors asked them to stop making/providing them with new 6S models for 3 months because they aren't selling. Apple is definitely threatened. And as a consumer, Samsungs Edge and Note lines are far more interesting than Apple's lame designs.Since most of Samsung's sales are cheap low-end models, I don't think Apple is too threatened.
It might be hard to believe it, but i will survive!No, I'm not going to "thrust" you, because I "thrust" myself to know what's funny.
Another stupid post. Carriers are now giving away S models because they can't sell them.That's easy to say when carriers were practically giving Samsung phones away.
The latest numbers from market research firm Strategy Analytics reveal that Samsung increased its lead over Apple as the world's largest smartphone maker, after shipping 81.3 million smartphones in the fourth quarter of the 2015 calendar year. Apple announced earlier this week that it sold a record 74.8 million iPhones during the same three-month period encompassing the busy holiday shopping season.
![]()
Global smartphone shipments grew 12 percent annually from 1.28 billion in 2014 to a record 1.44 billion in 2015, according to the data. Samsung and Apple contributed 317.2 million and 192.7 million smartphone sales respectively to that worldwide total, while Huawei, Lenovo-Motorola, and Xiaomi rounded off the top five smartphone makers. All other vendors collectively shipped 637.5 million smartphones in 2015.
Samsung led the fourth quarter with 20.1 percent market share, a slight increase over its 19.6 percent market share in the year-ago quarter. Conversely, Apple's fourth quarter market share was 18.5 percent, a slight decline from its 19.6 percent share in the fourth quarter of 2014. Huawei, Lenovo-Motorola and Xiaomi had market shares of 8.1 percent, 5 percent and 4.8 percent respectively.
![]()
In the year-ago quarter, Apple matched Samsung's 74.5 million smartphones shipped on the strength of the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, but its South Korean rival has since pulled ahead again. The comparison is largely unbalanced, however, as Samsung sells dozens of different smartphone models worldwide, while Apple currently only sells the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, and iPhone 5s.
Apple expects iPhone sales will likely decline in the March quarter, marking the first year-over-year decline since the smartphone was released over eight years ago. The decline will be realized if Apple sells fewer than 61.2 million iPhones this quarter, ending in late March. iPhone growth in the just-announced first fiscal quarter of 2016 was the slowest since the smartphone's introduction in 2007.
Strategy Analytics has also published smartphone data for the Chinese market, where Apple trails closely behind Xiaomi and Huawei.
Article Link: Samsung Widens Gap Over Apple in Worldwide Smartphone Market
Come on. I'm well aware that Apple does a lot of it's own copying, but thats not the pointDidn't realise the first iPhone was released that long ago.
I don't know how you can publish this article in good consciousness without mentioning that Samsung makes almost no profits or loses money on each of those units sold.
I don't know how you can publish this article in good consciousness without mentioning that Samsung makes almost no profits or loses money on each of those units sold.
Since most of Samsung's sales are cheap low-end models, I don't think Apple is too threatened.
It's the combination that's the killer. If Apple wasn't there, Samsung would have a chance in the high end market. Apple and Huawei/Xaiomi coming from both sides is what's killing Samsung.
Well maybe those Feld&Volk models that are covered in gold and diamonds![]()