Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Shame shame shame

This is getting ridiculous!

They can't say that they all don't copy each other now. If they were busy innovating or writing some software to win the hearts of the customer this wouldn't be necessary.
 
Sammy you're pushing your luck....you're about to get your ass handed back to you in a million pieces....lmao, wow these folks just dont know when to quit.
 
Neither product officially exists at the moment.

In the meantime Apple has already been granted access to current and/or existing Samsung product(s).

And what does that say about Apple doing billions of dollars worth of business with them?

Completely different divisions. Samsung is under contract with Apple.

It's like Apple can do no wrong in everyone's eyes here. It's really sickening.

Well, when they *do* do wrong, I'm sure we'll hear of it.

Apple's more or less been doing everything right for a few years now. I'm not sure why you find that so objectionable.
 
You know, if all of this legal stuff went away, companies would have to produce products that kept up with the development of technology to remain competitive. Now they can just sue each other and hold back on releasing what scientists are capable of producing in order to keep the prices for parts low and the retail prices of products high...
 
You know, if all of this legal stuff went away, companies would have to produce products that kept up with the development of technology to remain competitive. Now they can just sue each other and hold back on releasing what scientists are capable of producing in order to keep the prices for parts low and the retail prices of products high...

IP theft happens. It needs to be addressed somehow.
 
Neither product officially exists at the moment.

In the meantime Apple has already been granted access to current and/or existing Samsung product(s).



Completely different divisions. Samsung is under contract with Apple.

The post I quoted said "Samsung is a loser... Bunch of morons." In response this most insightful post, I asked the one who posted it what does it infer about Apple for doing billions of dollars a year business with them. And Apple is under contract with Samsung.
 
Haven't read anything but the OP in this thread but let me guess,


you guys are getting offended over what one multi billion dollar corporation is doing to another.

lol typical, some of you guys are sad
 
Let me repeat: "Launched in the UK earlier this month, the new Samsung Galaxy S II has quickly become the country’s most popular smartphone.

Just like we told you it happened in South Korea, the Galaxy S II is outselling Apple’s iPhone 4 in the UK, too"

This was reported by Unwired View. One can expect that once S2 is released in US it'll be more popular than iPhone 4 too.

There's always an article written about some new smartphone outselling the iPhone in a certain place for a certain time. I guess it's a great headline for grabbing attention. I seem to recall the same thing happened when the original Galaxy S was launched 6 months ago...
Samsung Galaxy unseats iPhone as No.1 in Japan - Nov 4, 2010

So what ever became of that?

Hmmmmm... last quarter Apple sold 18 million iPhones and Samsung only sold 10 million smartphones worldwide.

Whoops.

I guess those sensational headlines weren't enough. Maybe the new Galaxy S II will finally rot the Apple... but I doubt it...

There will be a new iPhone in a few months... and the cycle will repeat.

And much like the articles 6 months ago... the article you linked today won't matter that much in the long run...

.
 
Last edited:
The request is made to judge not the Apple layer and if the judge approves the request (as he did for similar request from Apple) Apple will have no choice but to comply.

No, they will have the choice to either comply or to drop the case...
I think samsung throw them a curve ball here and if the judge orders them to hand over the iphones and ipads they will probably do so, but I wouldn't bet on it.
 
Sammy you're pushing your luck....you're about to get your ass handed back to you in a million pieces....lmao, wow these folks just dont know when to quit.

I bet if this was Microsoft vs Apple you'd be complaining how Microsoft should stop bullying other companies.
 
IP theft happens. It needs to be addressed somehow.

Agreed, to a point.

My point was that it is in the consumers interest to have vicious competition and companies trying to beat others products and prices. Issues occur when companies stop developing products for fear that others will copy them.
 
Get real :rolleyes: iPhone is 10 years ahead of both of those phones.

Wow, have you even seen the Galaxy SII? I'm betting the answer is no.

Well, when they *do* do wrong, I'm sure we'll hear of it.

Apple's more or less been doing everything right for a few years now. I'm not sure why you find that so objectionable.

They have screwed up quite a number of times, I guess your to blind to see that?
 
This is madness. Bet that the lawyers must sign a contract on pain of death to see them. If not, I think a great bomb will go off.
 
It makes sense as a business ethic for Samsung. They started business doing groceries, and quickly acquired others, buying out competitors, and technology and manufacturing processes.

Samsung aren't a 'do this one thing' company anymore. You Americans and Europeans know them as an electronics company making TV's and microwaves. They make everything from apartments to cars to oranges and life insurance.

So, when they have a legal team do this, it is from experience. Samsung are a muuuuuuch older company than Apple, much more connected in the world, much larger, and much much more political. If Apple thinks they are up against another tech company, they need to do some research.

Again, Samsung re-hired a CEO who is known for tax-evation and they sue people for political cartoons. Apple may not be ready for Samsung's legal prowess.
This. And, lets just say Apple is lucky they are an American Company and not a South Korean one...
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)

Weak.

Really, Samsung?

You were already ordered to produce your knockoffs to Apple. THIS is your response??

Whats wrong with wanting to see the next iPhone? Apple threw a fit over Samsung and started all this.
 
Outside of this litigation, isn't there another patent infringement suit filed by samsung as a retaliation?

Also you guys don't think the timing of this law suit in line with their upcoming release of galaxy s2 in US considered a strategic move by apple? I think there was a recent news about someone from apple visiting samsung to use their new high resolution (2560x1600) 10" tablet/slate screen. I guess this is similar to how the politic is done in real life where you push and pull as needed

edit: Found it
Technology to optimize data transmission
Techniques for reducing power usage during data transmission
3G technology for reducing data-transmission errors
A method of tethering a mobile phone to a PC
 
Why couldn't Apple just show them an iPhone 4 and an iPad 2, and said that they are planning on making the iPhone 5 and iPad 3 more of internal upgrades?
 
Samsung should really stick to making TVs...in my opinion they're the best on the market. Phones + Tablets may be out of their league.

Yes

they should drop every single business outside of making TVs

that includes supplying parts to apple....
 
Bad idea

What is Samsung trying to prove here besides having access to more Apple technology to copy?
Why ape Apple in everything including lawsuit and legal maneuvers?
 
This sounds similar to my last company.
A semiconductor company (company a) was pissed another company (company b) stole so many of their good employees that company a was going to sue for patent infringments and wanted all their design plans of their products.
Company B said absolutely once we get all your product designs so we can specifically see what the infringments were.
Company A backed off.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)

Man.

Some of these responses were absolutely predictable.

The offenders know who they are.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

wordoflife said:
Haha .. good luck with that Samsung. You are really going to need it. Apple doesn't show their stuff under any circumstances.

Sorry, Apple cannot tell a judge to pound sand.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.