I'm not sure if I have this or not. I just posted a thread about how the pixels seem more visible, but I think I may have interlacing issues. When I set the image to the home screen it doesn't flicker, but when the icons move when i tilt the screen it flickers pretty bad. Does that mean I have it?
No, parallax effect and opening apps animation there will be flicker on ALL devices.
I'm talking about parallax off or laying your phone down on the table perhaps, a still image, it should not flicker.
Thank you for posting the test image. Fortunately my 5 does not evidence the effect. Curious as to how prevalent this issue may be.
Prevalent.
People need to stop using that "screen flicker" test image.
People are all over this thread saying "I SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH MY SCREEN BUT IT STILL FLICKERS WITH THE TEST IMAGE"
It clearly proves nothing. Not to the naked eye at least. If you can't see lines with a magnifying glass, then just be happy lol.
I don't know how many times it needs to be said, but I'll say it again:
the test image is perfect to confirm your suspicions
if you are under the impression your screen may be a bit 'off' coming from whatever screen/phone you had before. If you're 100% satisfied, why go looking for problems? especially if you had a crappy screen from a different manufacturer, just enjoy it.
If I say your girlfriend is ugly, but you still find her beautiful, who gives a crap.. you're the one dating her.
Just like you could say my iPhone 5 is crap, or you prefer space grey to my slate, or you think black is ugly all together and white with gold or silver all the way. It doesn't impact me in any way, shape, or form. Or maybe you prefer droid. It's not the end of the world one way or another.
But IMO, these interlacing screens are crap.
What you guys need to understand is with Steve gone and the remaining leadership, starting with Tim Cook, they are ALL bean counters. What that means is 2 things:
1. You will never see the quality control that was present during Steve era
2. Tim cook and gang will not work on improving quality it will probably keep going down so more profit can be milked.
Another example are the leaks, Tim Cook and gang don't see the need to spend the money and effort to keeps things tight under control until reveal.
Let's not rewrite history. Apple has always had a shaky QC rep, and it unfortunately has deteriorated quite a bit but it's hard to say if it's a leadership issue or just pumping out too many products now that literally everyone and their grandma owns or "has to have one" if they don't already. But they've always had QC issues and it probably has gotten worse with Tim Cook, and I'm all about critiquing the man, but it's not like it went from being finely crafted in Japan to being whipped together in Foxconn, it's been Foxconn for quite a while. But FWIW, iPad 3 trying to get a good screen was the most exhausting exchange process of my life. iPad 4 seemed not that much better (if you were image retention and multiple hue sensitive to screens like my eyes are) and in fact I gave up after two and returned to my 3 because I didn't want to play the game. The 5s I had briefly had a perfect screen, albeit my 5 has a better tint to it and still seems to be marginally superior. BUT something like 13 out of 15 phones I've looked at in stores have been complete crap. Not even slight interlacing, INTENSE instantly noticeable interlacing.
A brief rundown of some Apple products that had problems (and feel free to look them up, I'm not making them up out of thin air):
iPhone 1st gen had 'negative black' crushing, x-ray effect on dark movies, 3g suffered from light leak running down a whole side, 3gs i cant remember but maybe a bit of backlight bleed too (and i'm sure some interlace-y screens for all three as well in addition to negative black), 4/4s had HORIZONTAL interlacing, my iPad 2 had intense backlight bleed on the left side but I never bothered swapping it out, I've experienced some non unibody macbook pros being a stronger build than others, keyboards more clicky and less mushy than others, with the ipod 3rd gen there was white backlights and blue backlights. Oh and Image Retention iMacs as well.
Historically, screen quality has been the thing that Apple struggles with ,because they keep using suppliers that are garbage but fit the budget. Some suppliers are really good, that's why some people have perfect screens and others dont. It's not a calibration issue necessarily since no two screens are really exactly the same, but it's a manufacturer panel vs manufacturer panel inherent quality differences.
My theory is this is all LG related since they have a bad track record (Image retention on iMacs, they were the sole supplier of those screens if they aren't still..) and LG Nexus 4 shows the same interlacing effect too easily noticeable on blues (like facebook icon for example). Take those examples, coupled with the supplier rumors that Apple is using LG more and more often in their products and continually shying away from Samsung at every opportunity (Screw Samsung, right? I don't think so..), and you got yourself as good a guess as any.
It also coincides with EVERY iPad 4 I've come across has image retention (and ALL image retention macbook pros are LG). I'm sure there are iPad 4's without it, but since LG was supposedly main supplier of 4, it explains why I saw so many that had the problem.
tl;dr I'm picky with screens, Apple's always struggled this one but it's becoming insanely prevalent to the point of being 95% of display models I come across. And if you're picky, you're picky. If you're not, consider it a blessing in this age where quality control is an extinct idea but across the whole industry.