It was the definition of haughty and irrelevant because everyone will get a working device.
Do I care what you think? Not necessarily.
Wow, who's haughty now?
(Hint: still not him.)
Your defensiveness suggests that you struggle with what comes along with this being an internet forum—namely, opinions that don't match your own. Sorry buddy!
Back to the original point, it's pretty reasonable for someone to have been happy with their decision not to be an early adopter. It's puzzling how someone could imply that's a bad thing.
[doublepost=1510347144][/doublepost]
In that case I have to wonder if the issue is Apple or the customer. Especially considering they have one of the highest consumer satisfaction ratings in the industry.
Wow—the backward logic here is off the charts!
The notion that aggregate satisfaction numbers tell much, if anything, about an individual's experience is, well, wrong. In statistics and logic, this is what's known as an
ecological fallacy.
It's cool if you love Apple products. Totally. Implying that for someone who has had bad experience, the problem is them—yeah, that's not cool. That's actually pretty messed up.
[doublepost=1510347634][/doublepost]
Yawn.... 25? Growing problem? Let me know when it reaches more than .1%.
If you assume (conservatively) that there are only 2 million phones.
Then (25/2x10^6)x100 = .00125%. That number isn't even statistically relevant.
If we want to talk about statistical relevance, then this math doesn't fly.
25 is someone's guess as to the number of publicly posted "me too"s. In other words, it suffers from selection bias. It's not any sort of indication as to how widespread the problem actually is.
