Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Get what? That I should attack Apple because you are unhappy with their decision to make siri a 4S-only feature? Not sure why you decide to just attack me when your argument falls apart.
As a consumer, you don't have to accept everything Apple does with a smile. You can complain and voice your opinion. If you don't and just make excuses for them, you're not helping anybody, especially yourself.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Judas1 said:
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



That might be true but he's correct to his point that it's irrelevant. This is a product thing, the technical part doesn't matter like you think it does. As far as a product goes, Apple doesn't have to give anything away for an old product when it wasn't ever represented as having it, regardless of the technical capability of running it.

Software development costs money, just like hardware production does. Apple has no need to give away software to enable your iPhone 4 to use Siri just as, for example, Subaru wouldn't need to give you snow tires for your older model car just because the new one comes with them, but is otherwise the same car.

Just because the software could work does NOT mean it should be free. In the case of the phone or the car, you're able to go add the functionality yourself if you have the ability, or you can go buy the new product. You shouldn't be expecting handouts. That's not reasonable. The product you bought does at least everything it was sold with originally.
That argument works if Siri is just a big toy. But if Siri is integral to the new ios experience, then Apple basically told everybody without the 4s to go f themselves. Apple is about offering the Apple experience, software and hardware integeration. So now they say since you're not contributing more money by buying their latest phone, you're not gonna get the full experience. Is that fair to people who have supported them for years?

Where did apple say this again?
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



Where did apple say this again?
In the Apple tax. I thought it was clear.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Just going to point out Apple does not put the full value of every iPhone sold on their books. They with hold a certain chunk of them for accounting for future upgrades so yes part of the price you pay for your iPhone is to get upgrades.

That doesn't have to mean feature upgrades though. It could just as well be for security updates as well. Furthermore, it doesn't say what features will be added, or that any will be. I think my point still stands that anything not promised on the original sale shouldn't be expected.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone 4S: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

k995 said:
SandboxGeneral said:
Hardware or software, thats irrelevant, the principle remains the same.

No thats BS.

hardware you run into hardware problem. For example, if the electric wiring in your car was never adaprted to fit a skyroof in the car, its impossible. Cars are designed around such demands, its not added on later .

Software is in essence limitless. As long as you dont need new hardware the only restrictions that cuunt are pure economical. More profit, less costs,... Its an apples and oranges comparison.

So what's restricting the installation of a moonroof in car that was sold without one? Nothing really.

You cut a hole in the roof, put the unit in and wire it up to the cars electrical system.

The bottom line is that you're upset at Apples business strategy and that they aren't running things the way you think they should.

They know what they're doing and it works well. Their goal is to sell products and make money. Since they are at the top of the market world, it's safe to say that their stragety is working.

If they gave Siri away to the older iOS devices, what incentive (carrot) would they have for selling you newer device? The answer is not much. It's called planned obsolescence. If they made literally the perfect iPhone and had every and any feature one could want and had the power and performance to exceed literally everyone's wants and needs, they would never have to make another model again. Do that for every type of product they sell and eventually they would end up bankrupt because everyone would own one and never buy another again.
 
Last edited:
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Judas1 said:
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



Where did apple say this again?
In the Apple tax. I thought it was clear.

So all you're going to give me is a non-answer?
 
As a consumer, you don't have to accept everything Apple does with a smile. You can complain and voice your opinion. If you don't and just make excuses for them, you're not helping anybody, especially yourself.

You're right. I don't accept everything Apple does. As a matter of fact, I don't. However, when you assert that Siri is an integral part of iOS 5 - the facts show otherwise.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



That doesn't have to mean feature upgrades though. It could just as well be for security updates as well. Furthermore, it doesn't say what features will be added, or that any will be. I think my point still stands that anything not promised on the original sale shouldn't be expected.
Lets be honest here. Apple isn't grabbing you with just their hardware. Its with their integrated software and hardware that makes everything seamless. Thats what you bought into.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Is the experience of your iPhone any less seamless than when you bought it? No.
 
Lets be honest here. Apple isn't grabbing you with just their hardware. Its with their integrated software and hardware that makes everything seamless. Thats what you bought into.

So, when you bought the iP4, you were counting on being updated to siri - it's a debt owed to you?
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Is the experience of your iPhone any less seamless than when you bought it? No.
The cost of upgrades down the line was paid for already. And if Siri is integral, you paid for it as well.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Judas1 said:
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Is the experience of your iPhone any less seamless than when you bought it? No.
The cost of upgrades down the line was paid for already. And if Siri is integral, you paid for it as well.

That still didn't answer the question. Furthermore, said accounting doesn't guarantee upgrades, anyway.
 
You're right. I don't accept everything Apple does. As a matter of fact, I don't. However, when you assert that Siri is an integral part of iOS 5 - the facts show otherwise.

I think the point people are making is that Siri is obviously software, it has no tie to the hardware and that tie seems to be artificially put in place.

You don't have to accept everything Apple does, you can also accept it, but to defend it actively against people pointing out the fallacy that is Siri as an "iPhone 4S only" feature is going a bit a far. Leave Apple to defend themselves, you don't have to do it for them because you happen to think it's alright.

Personally, I don't care. I've finally found 1 use for Siri where it doesn't completely suck and that's setting reminders. Of course, it's just voice control for Reminders, not some kind of advanced personal assistant like the marketing would like to tell you, but hey, at least it works somewhat well for that.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



That still didn't answer the question. Furthermore, said accounting doesn't guarantee upgrades, anyway.
When are you gonna get it? You didn't pay for a 1 year experience. It was expected, and put into the cost, that you'd be getting the Apple experience for the life of the product.
 
So, when you bought the iP4, you were counting on being updated to siri - it's a debt owed to you?

What if you bought the iPhone 4 today ? Why are you defending Apple ? You're entitled to your opinion, but just drop this, Apple doesn't need a knight in shining armor here, there is obviously some form of "planned obsolescence" here rather than a real technical reason for the lack of Siri on older models.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Judas1 said:
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



That still didn't answer the question. Furthermore, said accounting doesn't guarantee upgrades, anyway.
When are you gonna get it? You didn't pay for a 1 year experience. It was expected, and put into the cost, that you'd be getting the Apple experience for the life of the product.

Heh. It's pretty clear that it's you who doesn't get it. You can't arbitrarily define x feature as "integral" to the experience. Apple gave you your upgrades for you iPhone. Deal with it.
 
I think the point people are making is that Siri is obviously software, it has no tie to the hardware and that tie seems to be artificially put in place.

If you read the twitter for this hack's developer, you'll see that there is indeed a real tie to the 4S. It may be trivial, but the hack requires files from the 4S.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



Heh. It's pretty clear that it's you who doesn't get it. You can't arbitrarily define x feature as "integral" to the experience. Apple gave you your upgrades for you iPhone. Deal with it.
I didn't. Apple did. And you keep defending them like a good sheep.
 
If you read the twitter for this hack's developer, you'll see that there is indeed a real tie to the 4S. It may be trivial, but the hack requires files from the 4S.

That does not change the fact it is software. They left out those missing files purpose. It is a 100% software issue.
 
What if you bought the iPhone 4 today ? Why are you defending Apple ? You're entitled to your opinion, but just drop this, Apple doesn't need a knight in shining armor here, there is obviously some form of "planned obsolescence" here rather than a real technical reason for the lack of Siri on older models.

Are you new? Apple does a lot of planned obsolescence. CoreDuo support in newer OSes, PPC ...

I'm not trying to be a knight in shining armor for anything, but there are a lot of people falsely claiming that siri is a part of iOS, when Apple has only marketed it as a part of the 4S - that is all I am trying to point out. Take that for what you want.

Again, planned obsolescence is a part of advancing technology - no matter what company is behind it.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Judas1 said:
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



Heh. It's pretty clear that it's you who doesn't get it. You can't arbitrarily define x feature as "integral" to the experience. Apple gave you your upgrades for you iPhone. Deal with it.
I didn't. Apple did. And you keep defending them like a good sheep.

Ah, classic. Can't win an argument? Resort to ad homs. Good job.

Apple never promised anything in words to the effect of what you're saying. You can keep spouting this nonsense, but it doesn't change the fact that it's something you're arbitrarily defining to support your viewpoint.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

B777Forevar said:
Siri should have been included in the 5.0 update for the iPhone 4.

But of course, Apple wants us to buy the latest and greatest.

Apple being Apple again.

Really?? Are you entitled to Siri on your iPhone 4? Apple never advertised it would be but you think it should be!?

My wife was looking to buy a new car a few months ago and the model she wanted that was in our price range didn't have navigation as an option - she had to get a different car that started off $5k more if she wanted navigation. Apple isn't doing anything much different but no one complains about car companies!? They could have put a navigation in the cheaper model but they want to entice people into buying the latest and greatest!

You don't HAVE to have Siri, so don't buy it if you don't want it. I bought an iPhone 4S and I couldn't be happier!


- Joe
 
Are you new? Apple does a lot of planned obsolescence. CoreDuo support in newer OSes, PPC ...

I'm not trying to be a knight in shining armor for anything, but there are a lot of people falsely claiming that siri is a part of iOS, when Apple has only marketed it as a part of the 4S - that is all I am trying to point out. Take that for what you want.

Again, planned obsolescence is a part of advancing technology - no matter what company is behind it.
Why isn't it a part of IOS? Its got nothing to do with the hardware of the ip4.

Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



Ah, classic. Can't win an argument? Resort to ad homs. Good job.

Apple never promised anything in words to the effect of what you're saying. You can keep spouting this nonsense, but it doesn't change the fact that it's something you're arbitrarily defining to support your viewpoint.
Because if you are a consumer, you'd see that Siri is a farse to sell the 4s.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't. Apple did. And you keep defending them like a good sheep.

It's not a question of defending Apple. I for one was discussing the options that any company has when bringing a product to market... be they feature options, pricing options, sales & marketing options, etc.

As a consumer, you have options as well... do I want to buy this product, or a competitive product, or no product at all? This is the principle on which free enterprise is based. Pointing out this truism is far from performing like a bleating sheep.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Judas1 said:
Are you new? Apple does a lot of planned obsolescence. CoreDuo support in newer OSes, PPC ...

I'm not trying to be a knight in shining armor for anything, but there are a lot of people falsely claiming that siri is a part of iOS, when Apple has only marketed it as a part of the 4S - that is all I am trying to point out. Take that for what you want.

Again, planned obsolescence is a part of advancing technology - no matter what company is behind it.
Why isn't it a part of IOS? Its got nothing to do with the hardware of the ip4.

Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)



Ah, classic. Can't win an argument? Resort to ad homs. Good job.

Apple never promised anything in words to the effect of what you're saying. You can keep spouting this nonsense, but it doesn't change the fact that it's something you're arbitrarily defining to support your viewpoint.
Because if you are a consumer, you'd see that Siri is a farse to sell the 4s.

I am a consumer. But at the same time I have no problem with businesses adding new features to new products to sell a product. Apple never promised Siri specifically on the iPhone 4, and even now, you can buy a 4 where it sits right next to a 4S in the store, and it doesn't have Siri. Apple markets and advertises this. If you buy the 4, you have no basis to demand it has the features of a newer product.

What about other software features? Gyro-based image/video stabilization? That kind of feature has been in cameras for years, but lo and behold, it hasn't been back ported to the 4 for free. Perhaps I should jump up and down and throw a tantrum about it and call people sheep when they try to bring me back to reality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.