First, how the hell do you know how many phones I've had and two, it doesn't really matter if you've had 100 of them if you don't know how to set them up properly
Wait, you have to set up a phone properly for them to work correctly? LOL!
First, how the hell do you know how many phones I've had and two, it doesn't really matter if you've had 100 of them if you don't know how to set them up properly
I've probably owned more androids than you and can say that for it to work well, and smoothly, I have to reboot it at least once a week. After awhile it starts to slow and gets laggy. It's a known issue with Android. Google it.
[doublepost=1493068224][/doublepost]
That is only because there is only ONE iPhone even if it's SE, 7, 7 Plus. Where there is all flavors of Androids as they are more fragmented. There are $20 phones all the way up to $900 phones. And many different manufactures. That is the only reason they have a lot of the market is because there are so many different types.
It's like this. Android is Toyota, while iPhone is Lexus. Both are pretty reliable, but Lexus is more reliable, and less of them on the road compared to Toyota.
[doublepost=1493069899][/doublepost]The most fragile phone.
Ho hum, must be a slow news day. Another bored iPhone user creating another Samsung / Android-bashing thread![]()
You sound like those who keep harping how "Android crashes all the time" or "Android is unstable" or "touchwiz is unusable" without realizing how naive and uninformed you sound.
Fine.. continue your rhetoric from yesteryear and keep us entertained.
Wait, you have to set up a phone properly for them to work correctly? LOL!
The only o/s that offers a pc replacement is Windows. Every other o/s falls far short. However if you want all of your devices to work together iOS along with Mac o/s offers that. It all depends on what you are looking for.Pointless to get argue over two mobile OS'. They cater to different people like golf cart (iPhone) and Tesla (Android). I progressed from iPhone 4S years ago to Galaxy Note series but for my neighbor that comes to me for tech support I wouldn't suggest anything other than iPhone for them. In the end, both OS' have been around for years and will continue to be because some people want a more limited iPod experience (iPhone) while others desire a pocketable PC replacement (Android).
[...]
The only o/s that offers a pc replacement is Windows. Every other o/s falls far short. However if you want all of your devices to work together iOS along with Mac o/s offers that. It all depends on what you are looking for.
Totally true, a desktop replacement for me needs to run my desktop software. Not pretend it is some desktop replacement because 2 windows can be opened. Best of both worlds is my iPhone 6s/7 and sp4.Not true since a PC can run Windows, Linux, MacOS, BSD, etc. but that proves the point that some don't need the capabilities so they're unaware of their device's deficiencies. One good example why Android is closer to a PC is its foreground and background multitasking capabilities.
On iOS, there's no background multitasking so a simple active Termius SSH client session gets suspended in the background then killed after 3 minutes. Also, on iPhone there's no foreground multitasking so it's limited to one app.
![]()
On Android it's very much like a PC since I can simultaneously run a game, play PiP movie and PiP Twitch feed in the foreground while simultaneously downloading a torrent, serving media/files to other LAN hosts, copying a file from another host with file manager, have active SSH+RDC+IRC sessions, etc. in the background. With Nougat and DeX it's even more capable.
![]()
(icons at top showing apps running in background)
![]()
That, is exactly the issue with android, imo. iOS there is no setup.First, how the hell do you know how many phones I've had and two, it doesn't really matter if you've had 100 of them if you don't know how to set them up properly
Seems it's the other way usually. Android users bashing iPhone users here.
[doublepost=1493079195][/doublepost]
I'm uninformed because you don't agree. Sorry if you don't like the facts. Read AC forums and learn.
Pointless to argue over two mobile OS'.
Yet you managed to do just that and used the tired and misleading "market share" graphic. When we see $50 iPhone models out there, we'll let you know.![]()
Yet you managed to do just that and used the tired and misleading "market share" graphic. When we see $50 iPhone models out there, we'll let you know.![]()
Isn't this an Internet forum where opinions and reasons are encouraged? Am I missing something here????I already said that's fine. If you test drive a car and just don't like it, just say you don't like it.
Don't start giving excuses like you couldn't get used to the gear stick coming out of the steering column instead of the center console or the cruise controls on the steering wheel instead of below the turn signal lever because those are things that are better either way and it's something you'd get used to with a little time.
I'd you don't like something, just say you returned it because you didn't like it. Otherwise people are going to read all these BS excuses that may deter them from a phone they might have really enjoyed.
This was honestly pretty much how it went when I went from the 5s to the HTC One and then the Nexus 5. Android got me to love big screens though, I hated android but I wouldn't have switched back without the bigger screens.
Back then the HTC phones where built better than the Samsungs. But yea, Apple was late to the game in terms of screen size, which caused a lot of people, including me to switch back then. It goes in cycles. I'm not loyal to any brand. If someone can build a better product then I'm open to trying new things.
What you fail to take into account is the style differences. You could say the same about cars, by boiling them down to 4 tires, brakes, gas and steering wheel. And by that measure no car is really worth more than the least expensive model.What's misleading? Market share is market share. There are phones out there which cost 1/3 the price of iphone and yet gives comparable capability to iphone. So? You may think you have bought an expensive iphone where its capability commensurates with the price. But it could also mean you paid all the extra for just the brand image and being "loyal" (aka locked in and not able to escape).
What you fail to take into account is the style differences. You could say the same about cars, by boiling them down to 4 tires, brakes, gas and steering wheel. And by that measure no car is really worth more than the least expensive model.
Maybe if you use branded accessories/fashion goods then it is more valid.
But cars..maybe not. A merc definitely costs more to produce than a toyota (due to thousands of different components). Rightfully it should be more expensive.
But I saw the breakdown that iphone has a lower material cost than some phones which are selling at a much lower price than iphone. You may say I have not factored in R&D cost but then again Apple buys most tech from other companies and put it into the iphone.
Maybe if you use branded accessories/fashion goods then it is more valid.
But cars..maybe not. A merc definitely costs more to produce than a toyota (due to thousands of different components). Rightfully it should be more expensive.
But I saw the breakdown that iphone has a lower material cost than some phones which are selling at a much lower price than iphone. You may say I have not factored in R&D cost but then again Apple buys most tech from other companies and put it into the iphone.
That's not the point; there is a price/value equation that works for me with iPhones. Doesn't work for you, not a problem. But the b/s about material costs. Somebody tears apart the phone and says this a10 has $.10 worth of parts, yet it costs twice as much to design as the competitions soc? Nonsense.Maybe if you use branded accessories/fashion goods then it is more valid.
But cars..maybe not. A merc definitely costs more to produce than a toyota (due to thousands of different components). Rightfully it should be more expensive.
But I saw the breakdown that iphone has a lower material cost than some phones which are selling at a much lower price than iphone. You may say I have not factored in R&D cost but then again Apple buys most tech from other companies and put it into the iphone.
Wow you're completely missing my point. I don't know how many times and how many different ways I have to say this to get my point across. If you don't like something, just say you don't like it. Don't pretend it's not something you could get used to when you didn't even give it a chance.Isn't this an Internet forum where opinions and reasons are encouraged? Am I missing something here????
Threads are very boring with one line answers and no discussion...