How are they pushing it hard when they have not even said it exists yet?I just don't see the point to push a product like this so hard
How are they pushing it hard when they have not even said it exists yet?I just don't see the point to push a product like this so hard
If this device will alow the quick development of 3D shapes, people who design physical objects like cars and lamp shades and airplane seats will go for it.
Meanwhile he runs a trillion dollar company that continues to be profitable. Seems like he knows what he is doing better than you or I.This is what happens when you follow, instead of lead.
Cook only jumped on the augmented reality train after Google and Meta had already planted the seeds. And unlike the smartphone, being late to the game won't change a thing. It's a bad idea all around.
That's an honest question: Is 3D industrial design a strong area for the Mac and is there good software for it?
This is what happens when you follow, instead of lead.
Cook only jumped on the augmented reality train after Google and Meta had already planted the seeds. And unlike the smartphone, being late to the game won't change a thing. It's a bad idea all around.
Don't think there is much yet but I would imagine if this product comes to market, there will be a developer kit for it beforehand (WWDC perhaps)That's an honest question: Is 3D industrial design a strong area for the Mac and is there good software for it?
Macrumors wouldn’t be the same without folks announcing how doomed and lost Apple is for the last two decades.Apple is lost. Sure they make money, but we are in another dark age.
All the rumors that are being published are coming from Apple. A very common hyping tactic.How are they pushing it hard when they have not even said it exists yet?
uhhhExercise? On VR? Cut the crap 🤣
3DTVs don't sell as well as as normal TVs because it's early days and the market is immatureVR doesn't sell as well as a Laptop or Desktop because it's early days and the market is immature. Apple have to build out iterations to get the tech to a stage of maturity.
VR is not a solely video game console accessory - it's much more than that.
Meanwhile he runs a trillion dollar company that continues to be profitable. Seems like he knows what he is doing better than you or I.
We sell Oculuses and PSVR/2. I know the market. It's extremely small and returns are higher than other electronics due to severe misunderstanding of the product's limitations. Even if it became a second monitor, I don't see a market for it. It's a niche product in search of a larger market. I do not see a majority of humanity walking the streets wearing one.People probably downvoted you for making multiple assumptions about a product based on "reports" and "rumors" and "imagination". Nobody knows what this mixed reality headset does, what it looks like and what it costs.
In fairness, Apple was often the strongest when they were late to the party and carefully built on what others had tried.
I do firmly believe that AR is a thing but that the time has not yet come. I'm fairly sceptical but I do agree with those who say let's keep an open mind until we actually see the thing.
But I do think that the fact that no one here seems to be able to articulate a clear and realistic use case, rather than a speculative one that requires tech that doesn't seem to exist, should give all of those in favour pause to think this through realistically.
3D TVs are irrelevant because they are a dead market, and VR isn't.3DTVs don't sell as well as as normal TVs because it's early days and the market is immature
This was never meant to be used outside. It's a home or indoor device.We sell Oculuses and PSVR/2. I know the market. It's extremely small and returns are higher than other electronics due to severe misunderstanding of the product's limitations. Even if it became a second monitor, I don't see a market for it. It's a niche product in search of a larger market. I do not see a majority of humanity walking the streets wearing one.
Especially with a limited battery life, a battery pack, and do you have $3,000 to just dump on a limited product category? The Apple Watch struggled for years, and still doesn't sell anywhere near 1/4 of iPhone or iPad sales and watches are a well-versed accessory category.
You are making a metric ton of assumptions that this device is somehow a Halo product transcending past niche accessory.
and PSvr is a thing toooculus is not the only game in town. you can make htc work on mac.
Many on here are very short sighted in what a device Apple is trying to build. If Apple can properly integrate eye tracking with hand input then it could be game changer in the way using finger input did to the iPhone. Think of Tony Stark using an AI to build and test models while being able to virtually touch the code. That is where all this AR technology is headed to make all types of work effortless.In fairness, Apple was often the strongest when they were late to the party and carefully built on what others had tried.
I do firmly believe that AR is a thing but that the time has not yet come. I'm fairly sceptical but I do agree with those who say let's keep an open mind until we actually see the thing.
But I do think that the fact that no one here seems to be able to articulate a clear and realistic use case, rather than a speculative one that requires tech that doesn't seem to exist, should give all of those in favour pause to think this through realistically.
what do you mean??3DTVs don't sell as well as as normal TVs because it's early days and the market is immature
The Apple rumor space is pure insanity at this point. We might as well be arguing about an OLED 19" iPad running MacOS. lol.How are they pushing it hard when they have not even said it exists yet?
We might as well be arguing about an OLED 19" iPad running MacOS
The "overly confident tech enthusiast."The "crypto of tech devices"
A solution searching for a problem.
Apple's device will not be used outside, for the most part. It's the same kind of MR as Quest Pro, just a lot better quality no doubt.