Screw Spotify. They certainly screw artists.
Cute try, but not even close to being the same thing. Should Apple get a percentage of every purchase you make on the Amazon app or literally any app where someone buys something? A percentage of a deposit you make using your banking app? How are Amazon and Spotify (or any e-commerce app) different? Aren't they all using Apple's "platform", their "ecosystem"?My question to Spotify is, can I listen to music on your platform and just pay the artist / publisher of the song and not you?
Well given Apple invested heavily in the tools to create apps for the AppStore and let people put apps there for free, including Spotify and Epic, and all users had to do is sign up on a webpage to pay them and then sign in to the app... greed doesnt seem to be as high for Apple.I agree. Spotify depends on everyone else as they have no product. The problem is Apple is just as greedy as Spotify and Epic, perhaps more so. The problem is GREED rules the world of business!
i did.Take my hand, and dump Spotify for Apple Music. 🙂
I feel the exact same way about Spotify.Apple Music sucks.
Don't artists have a choice whether to put their music on Spotify or not? Is someone holding a gun to their head and forcing them to put their product on Spotify?Screw Spotify. They certainly screw artists.
That's a laugh RIOT!!! Apple doesn't "let" people put apps there, Apple FORCES people to put their apps there. No choice. It's part of the game Apple plays and y'all buy into poor little Apple isn't getting their fair share (despite selling overpriced hardware like that isn't enough?). Take the App Store out of the picture and does Apple still deserve 30% for doing nothing? If so then why doesn't Apple charge macOS developers when you buy something in their software?Well given Apple invested heavily in the tools to create apps for the AppStore and let people put apps there for free, including Spotify and Epic, ....
That’s a laugh RIOT!!! No, they are NOT FORCED. A developer does not HAVE to develop for Apple devices. You seem to be ignoring that part. If they hate the rules that Apple puts forth so much…they are free to NOT develop an app for them 🤷♂️ Of course they’d be cutting off their nose to spite their face, because supposedly, despite being the minority of devices worldwide, Apple device owners spend more money on apps…but no, a developer is not FORCED. No one is saying they are required to develop for Apple devices!That a laugh RIOT!!! Apple doesn't "let" people put apps there, Apple FORCES people to put their apps there. No choice. It's part of the game Apple plays and y'all buy into poor little Apple isn't getting their fair share (despite selling overpriced hardware like that isn't enough?).
So, in your world, if developers chose not to develop for Apple, how long do you think Apple would survive? I know I wouldn't buy an iPhone when I could only get apps from Apple's store and their store doesn't have any good apps! It's a symbiotic relationship -- they need each other. Developers are actually doing Apple a favor by writing software for the iPhone--it helps Apple sell iPhones. You seem to be ignoring THAT part!That’s a laugh RIOT!!! No, they are NOT FORCED. A developer does not HAVE to develop for Apple devices. You seem to be ignoring that part. If they hate the rules that Apple puts forth so much…they are free to NOT develop an app for them 🤷♂️ Of course they’d be cutting off their nose to spite their face, because supposedly, despite being the minority of devices worldwide, Apple device owners spend more money on apps…but no, a developer is not FORCED. No one is saying they are required to develop for Apple devices!
That’s great. So prices to consumers should drop 27%, right?Doubt it. Take a look at this video and how easy it is for the developer to implement and user to use. I can imagine all devs implementing this. Why pay 30%, when you can get all the benifits of Apple ecosystem and store and instead give the 2.9% commission to Stripe.
Software developers are free to develop their own hardware platforms, except they can’t, lol. Consumers think these battles are about helping the consumer. Wake up. It’s all about big companies fighting over profits.So, in your world, if developers chose not to develop for Apple, how long do you think Apple would survive? I know I wouldn't buy an iPhone when I could only get apps from Apple's store and their store doesn't have any good apps! It's a symbiotic relationship -- they need each other. Developers are actually doing Apple a favor by writing software for the iPhone--it helps Apple sell iPhones. You seem to be ignoring THAT part!
But to the point I made which you twisted like a pretzel, Apple does indeed force developers to distribute their software for iPhones from the App Store versus developers distributing their own software. That's really the two choices.
This ruling means Apple can’t anymore, they are enjoined from adding any kind of barriers or fees outside of the App Store.
Unless you mean like charging for dev programs or increasing apple care or something like that instead.
Apple always wanting leech off third-party developers - for a streaming service Apple do not provide or deliver.
Nothing in there prevents Apple from raising developer fees, charging for hosting, d/ls or anything else.Imposing any commission or any fee on purchases that consumers make outside an app, and as a consequence thereof, no reason exists to audit, monitor, track or require developers to report purchases or any other activity that consumers make outside an app"
If by healing you mean causing developers to go bankrupt...then you nailed it.The software development world is healing.
Saying this while paying so bad to artists (music side) is wild.Going forward, this opens the door to other seamless buying opportunities that will directly benefit creators
Is it really fair that Apple now has to host apps for free? Building and running huge data centers costs a lot of money. I feel like this law went too far.Not really all that interesting.
Some developers who wish to keep more of their money will setup out-of-AppStore payment systems. Some will chose to keep their payments in App Store. The way it should have been from the very beginning.
Apples new hosting feeDoubt it. Take a look at this video and how easy it is for the developer to implement and user to use. I can imagine all devs implementing this. Why pay 30%, when you can get all the benifits of Apple ecosystem and store and instead give the 2.9% commission to Stripe.
Amazon doesn't have any in-app purchasesCute try, but not even close to being the same thing. Should Apple get a percentage of every purchase you make on the Amazon app or literally any app where someone buys something? A percentage of a deposit you make using your banking app? How are Amazon and Spotify (or any e-commerce app) different? Aren't they all using Apple's "platform", their "ecosystem"?
Spotify provides a service that uses Spotify servers that Spotify runs using media they license and pay for. Apple provides hardware, which they already get paid for and an operating system, which they license with the hardware. They force users to download apps (needed to use the hardware) from their App Store. One might conclude the high price of the hardware includes the use of the App Store. After that, Apple is done. They got paid for their part.
Maybe MS should get a percentage of every online purchase made on a Windows computer? It's ridiculous.
forces? geez. get a grip.That's a laugh RIOT!!! Apple doesn't "let" people put apps there, Apple FORCES people to put their apps there. No choice. It's part of the game Apple plays and y'all buy into poor little Apple isn't getting their fair share (despite selling overpriced hardware like that isn't enough?). Take the App Store out of the picture and does Apple still deserve 30% for doing nothing? If so then why doesn't Apple charge macOS developers when you buy something in their software?
😂🤣 Hyperbole.The software development world is healing.
we have the same argument every few months on here... sighThat's a laugh RIOT!!! Apple doesn't "let" people put apps there, Apple FORCES people to put their apps there. No choice. It's part of the game Apple plays and y'all buy into poor little Apple isn't getting their fair share (despite selling overpriced hardware like that isn't enough?). Take the App Store out of the picture and does Apple still deserve 30% for doing nothing? If so then why doesn't Apple charge macOS developers when you buy something in their software?
It's funny how many people here phrase that as a hypothetical—or like a gotcha. There are already services that cost more through the App than through the website. Twitch subscriptions are 25% cheaper on the website than in the app.That’s great. So prices to consumers should drop 27%, right?