Weird. You looked up the definition, yet you reckon that a perception of whether a person is professional or not (in this case Steve Job's opening remark on the phone) is considered an ad hominem in your book?You were ad hominem* long before you said I was unbelievable. (e.g., "You are simply amazing", "It's great to know that some fanboys think highly of huge corporations trying to intimidate the free press. You guys really are something." and later "Hmm, you call that behaviour professional?").
* ad hominem adjective attacking an opponents motives or character rather than the policy or position they maintain
Well, when it's there in plain view, in the same paragraph as the sentence you remarked upon, I have a hard time believing someone "missed" it.Woah, slow down there. I missed one thing you said, which is quite different from ignoring it and pretending it didn't exist.
I reread them, and I see you edited it a bit.To say that I "ignored anything and everything you said" is completely false. If you will, ahem, reread my posts...
I may be a fan... but I'm no tosser..
Third grader tactics has happened before even in this thread. Doesn't anyone at least have a litle imagination?
Good job taking everything out of context. You could simply ignore my posts.You really have got some attitude, haven't you? Almost every thread I see that you have participated in ends up like this. It is clear that you enjoy conflict, but might you take it elsewhere?
If it doesn't take more to make you sick, then don't read them.To be honest, I'm sick of reading your posts.
More third-grader tacticsAnd it is now so very clear why your username is what it is.