You think? How come?Seconded, the firewire is dying (albeit slowly) standard. Lets hope the new macs will have the wireless USB (wideband). I think this is more practical that Firewire.
If Firewire is needed, there are plenty of external expansion possibilities.
Haha, it's far from being a matter of "being able to afford". It's a matter of "willingness to downgrade" – and this goes for video cameras, audio recorders and audio interfaces.If you don't have the money to trade your camera for a USB one, then what are you doing spending all of that cash on the new Macbook?
Further proof of how you buy into the RDF purported by Steve Jobs. It's not about having "old" equipment. It's about having to downgrade if one wants to stay with the platform.Ok maybe thats not quite fair, why should you be forced to upgrade your camera. But then again, if it is so important that you do keep your old camera, then why not just buy an older model that has Firewire?
Ok, so you buy an older model. Laptops usually last average users 2-3 years, So by the time you want to upgrade again then i'd say your already aging camera is definitely due an upgrade anyway.
But think about this. How many of you use the Macbook as your primary computer anyway? Because whilst its always nice to have everything you want in something, does it really matter that you have to use your PC/iMac/Mac Pro retrieve data from your firewire camera, and transfer it to your MB? If you rely on your laptop more than your desktop, you should have gone Pro anyway.
I think Apple have been quite clever here. With the increase in graphics in the Macbook, i'd find it harder to go for a MBP. They need to differentiate more little features between the models in order to stop one from cannibalising the other's sales.
So here it is, if you must have the newest computer, and keep your older camera - buy a MBP. Otherwise there are plenty of other ways around it.
All this has been covered before. FW400 is a *consumer* interface originally designed in part to mate well w/the *consumer* format DV. FW400 has been on *consumer* Apple computers for nearly a decade. FW400 is inexpensive, and 'good enough' for lower-end professional work, but it's never been considered a professional interface (at least not in the video world).Firstly, Macbook Pro's are designed for professionals - and that includes Firewire, its hardly as if Apple are abandoning the standard right now. I'd consider the number of professionals that would prefer to own a Macbook and that require a firewire port considerably low, although accept the fact there will be some.
Why do all of you think that it's perfectly fine for professionals to go back 5-10 years in end-product quality, just because more consumers think USB is perfectly adequate?
*Many* professionals enjoyed the 13" MB because it was a good balance of size and power. Just like many people enjoyed the 12" PB before it got discontinued.
You are a professional?
get a macbook pro.
Their mistake then. Apple never sold the 13" macbook as a pro machine.
Sorry. I make my living off content creation and the new MBP does not have the (pro) features I need. To cite just one example: The new MacBook (so called) Pro is using the problematic lucent FW chipset rather than the (reliable) TI chipset. This problem has been discussed many times in this thread and yet people still recommend "get a pro", etc.
Apple's use of the word "pro" is simply marketing hype. You might believe everything Steve Jobs tells you, but most people outside Job's Reality Distortion Field are able to think for themselves. The MacBook was widely used in both the pro audio world and in the home recording world -- another subject addressed numerous times in this thread.
For audio production Apples current "pro" laptops are a joke, yet another subject brought up numerous times in this thread. Rain's LiveBook Mobile Audio Workstation blows the MacBook Pro away in terms of "pro" features for audio production.
Many of the DAW software, sampling software and libraries, digital effects, etc. are multi-platform these days. Switching to Windows is something many pros and hobbyists would find relatively painless. But apparently this is another fact Jobs and Apple just doesn't get. Can Apple really afford to lose its creative community?
You are a professional?
get a macbook pro.
Their mistake then. Apple never sold the 13" macbook as a pro machine.
Statements like this are so filled with ignorance, it's hard to know where to begin.I agree.
Firstly, Macbook Pro's are designed for professionals - and that includes Firewire, its hardly as if Apple are abandoning the standard right now. I'd consider the number of professionals that would prefer to own a Macbook and that require a firewire port considerably low, although accept the fact there will be some.
The Macbook mainly targets Students and to an extent, low income professionals. If you don't have the money to trade your camera for a USB one, then what are you doing spending all of that cash on the new Macbook? Ok maybe thats not quite fair, why should you be forced to upgrade your camera. But then again, if it is so important that you do keep your old camera, then why not just buy an older model that has Firewire? Ok, so you buy an older model. Laptops usually last average users 2-3 years, So by the time you want to upgrade again then i'd say your already aging camera is definitely due an upgrade anyway.
But think about this. How many of you use the Macbook as your primary computer anyway? Because whilst its always nice to have everything you want in something, does it really matter that you have to use your PC/iMac/Mac Pro retrieve data from your firewire camera, and transfer it to your MB? If you rely on your laptop more than your desktop, you should have gone Pro anyway.
Well, if you think it's clever to lose a sale completely, then, yes, they've been very clever. Because, not only have they lost the sale of two MB's to me for my business (nor will I be buying the MBP's because I don't want a notebook that big), they will also be losing the sale of new editing computers at my school where I teach video production, because I will now be recommending PC's. After nearly 25 years it's becoming increasingly clear that Apple no longer cares about creative content producers, or education, two markets that sustained them during the tough times.I think Apple have been quite clever here. With the increase in graphics in the Macbook, i'd find it harder to go for a MBP. They need to differentiate more little features between the models in order to stop one from cannibalising the other's sales.
So here it is, if you must have the newest computer, and keep your older camera - buy a MBP. Otherwise there are plenty of other ways around it.
[explanatory post]
You are a professional?
get a macbook pro.
Their mistake then. Apple never sold the 13" macbook as a pro machine.
You forgot to add, add, applications to replace Microsoft Office, Final Cut Pro, File Maker Pro, Disk Warrior, Tech Tool Pro, iPhoto, Adobe Photoshop and Graphic Converter.Because the PCs are stuck with more ports so that makes it pathetic, what about those who aren't in need of all those ports, if you need all those ports get a PC.
True, it's called upsell, unfortunately this frustrates many of Apple's old time loyal users....
I think Apple's decision had a lot to do with trying to make more people buy the MBP,
Millions upon millions of digital camcorders have only Firewire or iLink connections. Mine being just a little over a year old...
, doesn't mean there still isn't a small need for it. ...
Unfortunately, many Mac users do by used, not only for laptops, but for desktops. That is a lost sale. In this case, because of a <$20 cost to Apple.I agree.
...But then again, if it is so important that you do keep your old camera, then why not just buy an older model that has Firewire?
...
And that's the bitter pill. It is patently obvious that Apple clearly is abandoning markets they catered to for decades....After nearly 25 years it's becoming increasingly clear that Apple no longer cares about creative content producers, or education, two markets that sustained them during the tough times.
What I don't get is how the iPod Crowd can be so devoid of imagination that they a) think a monicker like "pro" matters, that b) only processing power matters, and c) that they can't even think so far that not all people do most (not necessarily time wise, but as in "importance") their work at a desk.
I guess they think that there is no other use for a laptop than to play games, muck around with photoshop, sync their iPod and iPhone and write mails at their favourite coffee shop.
It is true that many programs in the AV field are cross platform, however with 3 really notable exceptions. Final Cut Pro and Logic, both from Apple themselves and ProTools TDM. Sure ProTools LE and M-Powered run on both Mac and PC, however TDM (the Pro one) is only on the Mac platform.
Audio and visual applications can have some rather intense learning curves and tend to cost a ton with software and hardware. I agree that my MBP is a joke when it comes to doing any real recording. Basically it is a good idea pad and something I can use for backing tracks live, but for the power of recording I have to use my Mac Pro. The new Macbooks are out as there is no FW, The new Macbook Pros are also out of the question because of the problematic FW chip set. Going to a differenct platfrom is also out of the question as I have sunk a ton of time and money into my Logic set up.
Statements like this are so filled with ignorance, it's hard to know where to begin.
First, because Apple decides to put "pro" in the name of a computer, doesn't make it one. The MBP is lacking in several areas if it's going to be considered a truly "pro" machine.
Second, you would be wrong.
It has little to do with money and everything to do with form factor. We want a small notebook.
No business person that intends to continue in business buys outdated computer technology because even the latest technology will be outdated soon enough.
It's called location work. You can't practically carry a desktop to location. That's why we want the small form factor, too. But you wouldn't know that because you don't have a clue about the professional uses that you are commenting on.
Well, if you think it's clever to lose a sale completely, then, yes, they've been very clever. Because, not only have they lost the sale of two MB's to me for my business (nor will I be buying the MBP's because I don't want a notebook that big), they will also be losing the sale of new editing computers at my school where I teach video production, because I will now be recommending PC's. After nearly 25 years it's becoming increasingly clear that Apple no longer cares about creative content producers, or education, two markets that sustained them during the tough times.
So you have inferred from the lack of FW on the MB ithat Steve Jobs thinks that FW video is histroy?![]()
without reading the whole thread, i would think usb 3.0 will solve alot of the problems once its implemented
And that's relevant how? They exist today in the millions and are still being sold. USB will disappear someday. Conventional hard disks will disappear someday. Etc., etc. Everything comes to an end of it's useful life eventually. But that is irrelevant (And doesn't change the fact that what Jobs was purported to say is false). I buy a computer today for my needs today, not for several years down the road. Computers should be produced with the ports that are usable, and needed by many, today, not for some nebulous future.