Would SJ get pissy over nothing? Highly unlikely...
I hear what you're saying, "where's the hard proof" that Android copied iOS, and for the record "no" I personally don't have any such concrete evidence on my end to support this claim. So there you go.
However, I'd go as far to say that if Steve Jobs strongly suspected that Eric Schmidt used the knowledge that he gained of iOS while sitting on Apple's B.O.D. to help eventually develop Android into what it is now** then it's a strong possibility that there is some real truth to this, especially when Jobs went on record to say he felt "betrayed" by Schmidt in reference to the whole matter, nor did he want to accept a financial settlement to resolve the matter.
Legally speaking, this "insider trading" accusation hasn't (or even can't) be proven either way***, at least not amongst ourselves in the public sphere, so arguing back n' forth for or against it is kinda fruitless. But the reason why I posted that link earlier was to highlight where the poster WeegieMac might have been getting his "source" from, and that IMO it's a noteworthy, if not credible one.
** even though it was 2 years after the 1st iPhone that Android started looking more like iOS, that still doesn't mean it wasn't happening (the use of iOS trade secrets) to help get Android to that stage in it's development. Remember, in computing, the designs that appear on the market today were road-mapped for production at least 1.5 years prior to public release.
*** which if it is true, is only more credit to the thief for successfully accomplishing their goal, as they have concealed it enough to stave off any potential legal action taken against them.
Buy people read the things they post.
2.010, TWO years AFTER the first Android device, ONE year after Schmidt left Apple board.
And what features is Jobs talking about?
I hear what you're saying, "where's the hard proof" that Android copied iOS, and for the record "no" I personally don't have any such concrete evidence on my end to support this claim. So there you go.
However, I'd go as far to say that if Steve Jobs strongly suspected that Eric Schmidt used the knowledge that he gained of iOS while sitting on Apple's B.O.D. to help eventually develop Android into what it is now** then it's a strong possibility that there is some real truth to this, especially when Jobs went on record to say he felt "betrayed" by Schmidt in reference to the whole matter, nor did he want to accept a financial settlement to resolve the matter.
Legally speaking, this "insider trading" accusation hasn't (or even can't) be proven either way***, at least not amongst ourselves in the public sphere, so arguing back n' forth for or against it is kinda fruitless. But the reason why I posted that link earlier was to highlight where the poster WeegieMac might have been getting his "source" from, and that IMO it's a noteworthy, if not credible one.
** even though it was 2 years after the 1st iPhone that Android started looking more like iOS, that still doesn't mean it wasn't happening (the use of iOS trade secrets) to help get Android to that stage in it's development. Remember, in computing, the designs that appear on the market today were road-mapped for production at least 1.5 years prior to public release.
*** which if it is true, is only more credit to the thief for successfully accomplishing their goal, as they have concealed it enough to stave off any potential legal action taken against them.