Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's funny, I go to MacRumors.com News Discussion and immediately this article sticks out as it has nearly 5000 comments. And I'm sure Apple themselves monitor this site. They'll at least consider Blu ray. Of course, I've heard rumors that the MBPs will have no optical drive in the next update. I'd like to see Blu-ray drives as an option, but I don't see Apple doing this.
 
Originally it was to be able to easily update the firmware and to access web-based bonus features. Obviously now they are using it for things like YouTube, Netflix, etc., because, for the first time ever, there is becoming a viable alternative to physical media. Everyone talks about where things are going but none of those people are saying when we will get there or what to do in the mean time. In the future we'll have flying cars. In the future we'll get rid of the internal combustion engine. In the future the internet will kill the big five music labels and the CD format. In the future...

Once these companies start to phase out making Blu-ray players w/streaming abilities in favor of making streaming-only boxes then I'll agree to put a fork in BD. Until then I see both formats co-existing in the market place just like we've had music streaming/downloads co-existing with CDs for the last decade or so (and CDs are still out performing legal streams/downloads).

There is a difference between dying since the day you were born and being on your deathbed.

Hey- I would like them to offer it as well, all I said was I understand why they haven't.


Using FCP is very limiting though. If you need to create a basic 'one-off' for a client or something simple to only be used in-house it can most likely get the job done but it's not like FCP's "share" function gives you anywhere near the power and flexibility that a full blown authoring app would. Even once you make it though you still can't play it back.


Lethal

True enough.
 
Are we still talking about this? lol... :rolleyes:

Optical drives ---> dying/dead; Replacement: Stream, baby, stream. (plus "The Cloud", when capacity is sufficient and inexpensive enough for the masses) :apple:
 
While streaming may be the future, those who own a physical disc don't have to worry about an expired license. At any point, media that is streamed can have it's license pulled and will no longer be available until a new license is issued.
 
Who are these annoying people from the future that continue to speak of how unnecessary certain technologies are back in their time? Please, return to your time machines, and let the present-living people deal with the now.
 
I converted to Mac in October 2009. Since then I have bought the following for my business - (4) Minis and (1) Mini Server, (1) 27" C2D iMac and (1) 27" i7 iMac, (2) 13" MBP's, (1) 15" MBP. I believe this does make me a qualified Apple CUSTOMER to have a voice in the matter. Why did I buy all these Macs? Because Windows and Dells are pure garbage and I was sick of some Windows conflict always screwing up an employee's PC. Now with OSX "it just works" and there is no down time for my employees like our Windows days. When employees have down time that costs me money. And I don't like to lose money. My Macs make me money without BD.

My 12-core and 8-core Mac Pros DON'T. When you're at that level of investment, talk to me.

I disagree. This thread could be killed off by the creation of a new codec that allows 1080 quality video with 5.1 or better sound at a feasible file size. As well as the embracing of downloads by the studios, who create the same feature sets on both the digital and physical versions. Thus negating the need for most parties to buy disks to then have to rip them for easier travel etc.

I disagree. This thread could be also be killed off when a comet hits the earth. Or just Steve Jobs. And just as likely.

And if not, your new codec rendered useless by further net crackdown on torrents and thieves. And by still higher optical disc throughput and advancement. Far more likely.

Wow. 169 pages, people? Ridiculous, I think.

What is ridiculous is not going anywhere until we have aircars because "they're just around the corner" because the Jetsons predicted we'd all be driving them by 1975.

Sometimes acclaimed "visionaries" just turn out to be certifiably nuts despite success facilitated by handlers. Add megalomania to the mix, and you have the CEO of Apple. Did anyone really think Howard Hughes was going to be the last in a very long line?

:apple:
 
Last edited:
Are we still talking about this? lol... :rolleyes:

Optical drives ---> dying/dead; Replacement: Stream, baby, stream. (plus "The Cloud", when capacity is sufficient and inexpensive enough for the masses) :apple:

Well, L.A. must have some nice infrastructure...

so...again...
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
BluRay is specced ad 53,95 Mbit/s
40 MBit/s video
13,95 Mbit/s audio
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Now, would you please wake me up when you have this kind of speed available all over the world, especially in rural areas.

Oh, btw, I don't live in the US and have an unlimited 30MBit line for little money - but as far as I've read here, there are caps depending on the ISPs beginning at 250 GB...

...which would give you the astounding number of 5 feature films per
month
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Have I used enough rolling eyes? I think so...and last point

SALT - BluRay (Deluxe Extended version) - 14.95 € on Amazon
- 3.27 GB HD-file - 16.99 € on iTunes

Yeah, downloads sure will take off.
 
Despite some people's insistence that BR is a dead technology it seems to be doing well so far amidst all the media clutter. Of course it will die off like any technology but by the time it dies it would have lived a fruitful life :rolleyes:
 
Despite some people's insistence that BR is a dead technology it seems to be doing well so far amidst all the media clutter. Of course it will die off like any technology but by the time it dies it would have lived a fruitful life :rolleyes:

agreed. Sometimes simpler is better. I love tech as much as the next guy, but streaming can be a PITA - getting your network optimised, ISP caps, licensing, different codecs, does it work on a cheap STB or need an expensive computer connected to your TV (digital copy I'm looking at you) etc.

Or just stick a disc in and play.
 
Steve Jobs upgrades BluRay from "Bag of hurt" to "Mafia"

soup-nazi-jobs-no-blue-ray.jpg

http://www.9to5mac.com/45693/steve-...c-MacAllDay+(9+to+5+Mac+-+Apple+Intelligence)
 
Well, L.A. must have some nice infrastructure...

so...again...
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
BluRay is specced ad 53,95 Mbit/s
40 MBit/s video
13,95 Mbit/s audio
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Now, would you please wake me up when you have this kind of speed available all over the world, especially in rural areas.

Oh, btw, I don't live in the US and have an unlimited 30MBit line for little money - but as far as I've read here, there are caps depending on the ISPs beginning at 250 GB...

You can reach nearly the same quality with a good H.264 Encoder, like x264.
"“Professional” tools for Blu-ray video encoding can cost as much as $100,000 and are often utter garbage."

"With x264′s powerful compression, as demonstrated by the incredibly popular BD-Rebuilder Blu-ray backup software, it’s quite possible to author Blu-ray disks on DVD9s (dual-layer DVDs) or even DVD5s (single-layer DVDs) with a reasonable level of quality."

https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/11658366/


Also take a look at this: https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/11657899/
 
it’s quite possible to author Blu-ray disks on DVD9s (dual-layer DVDs)

Assuming this is true, most people can't stream 6GB an hour to watch a 9GB 90 minute film. My theoretical maximum is about 3.6GB/hour (which I never reach), so I couldn't even stream a DVD5 "I can't believe it's not Blu-Ray" disc. And my connection is _above_ average in my country.
 
Assuming this is true, most people can't stream 6GB an hour to watch a 9GB 90 minute film.

Thats not my point. My point was that it is possible to reach nearly the same quality if someone is using x264 with less bitrate.
And even 720p could be nice. Just iTunes 720p is "crap".
In a german forum someone wrote that he took a blu-ray and x264 (-> handbrake) with high profile + CABAC and other features. He made his own 720p film. The result was, that the quality was really good although the filesize was smaller, than that "garbage" that Apple is offering in iTunes/AppleTV and is calling "HD".

German c't magazin took a look at some streaming services and iTunes was at the last position in terms of picture quality.

So iTunes Store is everything but not the maximum in terms of picture quality.
 
Last edited:
Thats not my point. My point was that it is possible to reach nearly the same quality if someone is using x264 with less bitrate.
And even 720p could be nice. Just iTunes 720p is "crap".
In a german forum someone wrote that he took a blu-ray and x264 (-> handbrake) with high profile + CABAC and other features. He made his own 720p film. The result was, that the quality was really good although the filesize was smaller, than that "garbage" that Apple is offering in iTunes/AppleTV and is calling "HD".

German c't magazin took a look at some streaming services and iTunes was at the last position in terms of picture quality.

So iTunes Store is everything but not the maximum in terms of picture quality.

Fixed that for you.

And we basically don't need to argue that compression results in lesser quality. Yes, I know a lot of people confident with MP3 or AAC audio. I still prefer native CD format - and it actually is better and more dynamic, as long as you use the right equipment. :D
 
And we basically don't need to argue that compression results in lesser quality. Yes, I know a lot of people confident with MP3 or AAC audio. I still prefer native CD format - and it actually is better and more dynamic, as long as you use the right equipment. :D

But the Blu-Ray is not the "CD". The Blu-Ray is the "MP3" ;) -> They are using H.264/MPEG-4 AVC compression technology (some are using also MPEG2 or VC1).
x264 (what handbrake is using), is a free h264/avc encoder. It is free and probably one of the best encoders (maybe the best).

So if you are "shrinking" a blu-ray (smaller filesize) maybe you will lose some quality (it depends), but the result can be still really good.

Again:
Diary Of An x264 Developer (*)
"“Professional” tools for Blu-ray video encoding can cost as much as $100,000 and are often utter garbage."

"With x264′s powerful compression, as demonstrated by the incredibly popular BD-Rebuilder Blu-ray backup software, it’s quite possible to author Blu-ray disks on DVD9s (dual-layer DVDs) or even DVD5s (single-layer DVDs) with a reasonable level of quality."

"To celebrate this achievement, we are making available for download a demo Blu-ray encoded with x264, containing entirely free content!"
-> http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/328



(*)
"According to Apple Insider, the Messaianic chief Macolyte was asked what he thought of the VP8 WebM video in an email, to which Steve simply replied with a link to a posting on Jason Garret-Glaser's Diary Of An x264 Developer blog."
 
Last edited:
You want BluRay...get a PC. This year's new Mac's will barely include a DVD drive anymore.

Hard drives are slowly but surely being replaced, too, by SSD's and PCIe solid-state flash and "cloud storage". I use hard drives solely for storage anymore.
 
You want BluRay...get a PC. This year's new Mac's will barely include a DVD drive anymore.

Hard drives are slowly but surely being replaced, too, by SSD's and PCIe solid-state flash and "cloud storage". I use hard drives solely for storage anymore.

No Thanks. I'll stay with my dedicated BD player and PS3. No way will I ever buy a Windows PC again - I like my computers to work. :D
 
No Thanks. I'll stay with my dedicated BD player and PS3. No way will I ever buy a Windows PC again - I like my computers to work. :D

And PC computers don't? Then why all businesses prefer PCs? They must be stupid and you must be really smart :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.