GaGa earned 90 million the last two years. Does that make her the greatest and/or most influential recording artist/musician/singer of all time? Does that even put her in the top twenty?
What about her utterly talentless soft porn high priestess predecessor Spears?
I really wish intelligent people would quit equating success with quality. Stupid clueless people doing so I can understand. The rabble have to have their Horatio Alger myths or they'd kill themselves and not show up for work Monday morning.
Success, in THIS world, at THIS time, has absolutely NOTHING to do with quality, but rather upon how successful your P.T. Barnum ability to find that "sucker born every minute" is and how successful you (or your ability to get others to) market your "vision" to that sucker. Add to it "hard work" and "luck", a certain (too often reprehensible) "ability" to find and use other people's money, and a whole lot of "use" to the powers that be, and you too will be one of the most "successful" "visionaries" of "all" time.
Whether or not you actually service your consumers, as GaGa does, or defecate on your power users while pandering to your LCD base as Jobs does.
And may God and/or Universe save you from your "success".