Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Was your article about entertainment as a whole, or just home video? This one focuses on the big picture, and includes things like movie theaters and cable TV, as well as movie purchases...

Good question .. I don't know either, as I've not gone back and opened both up both references to find out.

Unfortunately, I'm not likely to get to it today or tomorrow...and maybe not for 2 weeks. So I'm not trying to blow this off ... life is interfering with a project that's been driving me nuts from unnecessary emergencies due to some individuals' incomptence that's requiring me to go kick heads, etc, in order to not utterly blow a major schedule milestone.


-hh
 
"And the downloadable movie business is rapidly moving to free (Hulu) or rentals (iTunes) so storing purchased movies or TV shows is not an issue."
Hulu is not free, it requires you to watch commercials. And that quote is pointless overall. That market began there, what is moving? In other news, the sky appears blue.

It should be obvious - neither IOS5 not Icloud are shipping products. They are vaporware until Apple releases them.
"Vaporware" is not usually used unless there is reason. Apple does not have a history of vapor issues, unlike some companies. eg, iOS5 has a specific time period for delivery, which has not been moved. We are simply not there, yet. In late November, if it isn't out, then you can pull out "vaporware".
 
Yes, we're all eagerly awaiting this vaporware called Icloud.

It's interesting, though, that it seems to copy a number of features that Android has had for quite some time. I thought that "copying" wasn't called "innovating" if some other company is doing it.

Interestingly the term "vaporware" has Microsoft origins. Imagine that.

"Winblad compared the word to the idea of "selling smoke", implying Microsoft was selling a product it would soon not support."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware
 
Interestingly the term "vaporware" has Microsoft origins. Imagine that.

"Winblad compared the word to the idea of "selling smoke", implying Microsoft was selling a product it would soon not support."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware
Yes, but then Apple was selling Final Cut Studio right up until the day they released Final Cut Pro X, which is incompatible with the former. Is that any different? I think it could be said that Apple frequently sells things that they will soon not support. I can buy another Mac Pro right now that comes with a DVD burner (but not a BD burner, heh) despite the fact that they don't want people to use discs any longer.

At least Microsoft still supports discs. Imagine that. :)
 
Last edited:
Yes, but then Apple was selling Final Cut Studio right up until the day they released Final Cut Pro X, which is incompatible with the former. Is that any different? I think it could be said that Apple frequently sells things that they will soon not support. I can buy another Mac Pro right now that comes with a DVD burner (but not a BD burner, heh) despite the fact that they don't want people to use discs any longer.

At least Microsoft still supports discs. Imagine that. :)

Huh? Yeah it is "any different."
 
Huh? Yeah it is "any different."

I know, right. The look on Walt Mossberg's face when the Adobe CEO tries to say that Flash works on Android sums up my thoughts.


Screen-shot-2011-06-02-at-5.20.54-PM.png


http://www.cultofmac.com/walt-mossberg-tells-adobe-ceo-to-his-face-that-flash-sucks-on-android/98231
 
Thank you for finding support for my use of the term

Interestingly the term "vaporware" has Microsoft origins. Imagine that.

"Winblad compared the word to the idea of "selling smoke", implying Microsoft was selling a product it would soon not support."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware

Later in the link that you cite, it says:

It is generally used to describe a hardware or software product that has been announced by its developer, but that has not yet been released. Use of the term has gradually become more inclusive in the last three decades.

The bolded sentence has footnotes to

page 3 - Bayus, Barry L.; Jain, Sanjay; Rao, Ambar G. (2001-02-01). "Truth or consequences: An analysis of vaporware and new product announcements". Journal of Marketing Research (American Marketing Association) 38 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.3.18834. ISSN 0022-2437.

page 11 - Prentice, Robert A.; Langmore, John H. (1994). "Beware of varpoware: product hype and the securities fraud liability of high-tech companies". Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Harvard Law School) 8 (1). ISSN 0897-3393. Retrieved 2010-04-16.​

Since both IOS5 and Icloud have been announced, but not released, they are vaporware according to general use of the term.
 
Later in the link that you cite, it says:



The bolded sentence has footnotes to

page 3 - Bayus, Barry L.; Jain, Sanjay; Rao, Ambar G. (2001-02-01). "Truth or consequences: An analysis of vaporware and new product announcements". Journal of Marketing Research (American Marketing Association) 38 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.3.18834. ISSN 0022-2437.

page 11 - Prentice, Robert A.; Langmore, John H. (1994). "Beware of varpoware: product hype and the securities fraud liability of high-tech companies". Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Harvard Law School) 8 (1). ISSN 0897-3393. Retrieved 2010-04-16.​

Since both IOS5 and Icloud have been announced, but not released, they are vaporware according to general use of the term.

Regardless, the term "vaporware" was coined as a direct result of typical Microsoft shenanigans.
 
Yes, but then Apple was selling Final Cut Studio right up until the day they released Final Cut Pro X, which is incompatible with the former. Is that any different? I think it could be said that Apple frequently sells things that they will soon not support. I can buy another Mac Pro right now that comes with a DVD burner (but not a BD burner, heh) despite the fact that they don't want people to use discs any longer.

At least Microsoft still supports discs. Imagine that. :)

360 is a good model to look at. They are starting to have downloads of full games but obviously they still have disks. The XBOX 3 will use disks as well so they can sell to EVERYONE not a niche group. The Windows box makers will use disks till its TIME for it to go if ever. Download and physical media are good when they co exist.

Hell even Sony who pushes Blu ray and has vested interest in it allows downloads of movies on their PSN store, but the PS4 will have Blu as well. Steve thinks he is making a dent in the Universe, which is classic statements from a hallucinogen user. Still probably uses as far as I know.

He and his fanboys think he is far better than he really is. I give Ive and the coders of OSX more credit for creating "Image" which especially the states are all about. There should be an antitrust suit IMO if they continue to push MAS as the only distribution. I have seen suits for lesser actions.

Going to be funny to see Apple sell a Mac Pro without an optical drive. Lacks space I guess. :p
 
Later in the link that you cite, it says:



The bolded sentence has footnotes to

page 3 - Bayus, Barry L.; Jain, Sanjay; Rao, Ambar G. (2001-02-01). "Truth or consequences: An analysis of vaporware and new product announcements". Journal of Marketing Research (American Marketing Association) 38 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.3.18834. ISSN 0022-2437.

page 11 - Prentice, Robert A.; Langmore, John H. (1994). "Beware of varpoware: product hype and the securities fraud liability of high-tech companies". Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Harvard Law School) 8 (1). ISSN 0897-3393. Retrieved 2010-04-16.​

Since both IOS5 and Icloud have been announced, but not released, they are vaporware according to general use of the term.
Vaporware typically has negative connotations that imply it likely won't ever see the light of day, which is behavior Apple doesn't engage in.
 
Like I said, anyone with $99 can buy iOS 5 beta today.

Giving access to time-limited test versions to a limited pool of selected users is not a "release". It's a beta.

See Apple Disabling iOS 5 Beta Installs and Developer Accounts Over Sales of Device Slots? for some more context.


Vaporware typically has negative connotations that imply it likely won't ever see the light of day, which is behavior Apple doesn't engage in.

Please go re-read the Wiki article that we've been shown. The gist is:

It is generally used to describe a hardware or software product that has been announced by its developer, but that has not yet been released. Use of the term has gradually become more inclusive in the last three decades.

Windows 8 is vaporware. It's been announced and shown, but not released to the public. What are the chances that it will never see the light of day?

IOS5 is vaporware. It's been announced and shown, but not released to the public. What are the chances that it will never see the light of day?

Icloud is vaporware. It's been announced and shown, but not released to the public. What are the chances that it will never see the light of day?

The general use of the term has evolved to include any software/hardware that's been announced, but not released.

At this point in time, even Intel's Thunderbolt looks like it could still be vaporware.

Search for "Thunderbolt" at Newegg. Most of the hits are for accessories for the Thunderbolt Android phone (a great true 4G/LTE phone, by the way). There are a couple of ATX power supplies called "Thunderbolt" (cute name for a PS), and an Asus motherboard called "Thunderbolt" (which doesn't have any Intel Thunderbolt ports).

Search the Apple Store for "Thunderbolt" - few hits, and all say "ships in 2-3 weeks" (the cable ;) ) or "ships in 3-5 weeks" (the $1000 monitor and the $1000-$2000 drives).

I'm overcome by the "vapors".
 
Last edited:
I guess then, every thing google has the beta tag on is Vapor Ware.

If you want any independent confirmation of the absurd use of the word "beta" by Google, search Google itself for "google permanent beta".

11.6M hits!

It's a common joke about the "permanent beta" state of many Google apps.

They're not "beta", in spite of the tag.
 
Giving access to time-limited test versions to a limited pool of selected users is not a "release". It's a beta.

See Apple Disabling iOS 5 Beta Installs and Developer Accounts Over Sales of Device Slots? for some more context.

1) You just said a beta is a release as long as it's a Google beta.
2) Apple isn't disabling any beta installs for folks who actually pay Apple the $99.

And excusing Google because they are in "perpetual beta" means iOS 5 wouldn't be vaporware as long as Apple had a history of keeping things in beta for an absurdly long time?

You're kind of being a bit nutty today.
 
figured i would troll here and actually be on topic :D:D
I think apple lost out on a real opportunity here. With more and more manufacturers competing with apple in all spaces with more options not having industry standard hardware is limiting. Personally I was hoping for a SandyBridge blu ray 15" MBP. Now I am going to spend that money on a new Sony Z. Apple has marched to the beat of their own drum with good success but I imagine that I am not the only one now looking elsewhere for hardware. Recent reports have windows 7 being ob 40% of computers this year and the fastest adopted os of all time. Apple won't care but I think they really could have moved way more hardware thus more profit if they got on board.
 
1) You just said a beta is a release as long as it's a Google beta.

No, I said that Google calls their releases "beta".

The "Google permanent beta" thing is a big joke.


2) Apple isn't disabling any beta installs for folks who actually pay Apple the $99.

Actually, I thought the story was that some of the earlier betas expired and were disabled, regardless of whether you had legitimate rights to use the beta. (That wasn't the headline - but headlines are chosen to generate page views, not provide facts.)


And excusing Google because they are in "perpetual beta" means iOS 5 wouldn't be vaporware as long as Apple had a history of keeping things in beta for an absurdly long time?

Not nutty at all. Google has a process of releasing stuff with the label of "beta", and rapidly fine-tuning the product with frequent releases.

Apple has a more traditional beta program of controlled releases of test software to limited groups of chosen people.

The phrase "Apple beta" and "Google beta" mean completely different things - and the only "nutty" thing would be to pretend that they mean the same thing.

Microsoft has a blended approach.
  • TAP - for high value partners, access to the daily/weekly builds for testing (if Apple has something analogous, no one would be permitted to talk about it)
  • MSDN - paid access by developers to major milestone builds (analogous to Apple developer accounts)
  • Public Betas - open (but very generously time-limited) access to a couple of super-major controlled builds (Apple doesn't do this)


----------

"Well,....obviously...."(Antoine Dodson) you brought it on yourself with one of your usual slams on Apple by calling iCloud "vaporware."

And by the link that you yourself posted:

It is generally used to describe a hardware or software product that has been announced by its developer, but that has not yet been released.

Icloud has been announced. It has not been released.

Therefore by the definition that you yourself proposed "Icloud is vaporware".
 
Last edited:
And by the link that you yourself posted:

Icloud has been announced. It has not been released.

Therefore by the definition that you yourself proposed "Icloud is vaporware".

You know very well your use of the word "vaporware" was delivered with an unfavorable tone. I don't think I ever recall you saying anything favorable about Apple. I believe that might fall into the category of being inflammatory. But don't worry, I am not going to report you. I am not a snitch. Its the way I was raised.
 
You know very well your use of the word "vaporware" was delivered with an unfavorable tone. I don't think I ever recall you saying anything favorable about Apple. I believe that might fall into the category of being inflammatory. But don't worry, I am not going to report you. I am not a snitch. Its the way I was raised.

04cf0cba-cbfb-44c8-aee2-5e8f8b296af5.jpg


It's not his fault that Microsoft is a software company and not a hardware company. It is not his fault that Windows does not natively support Blu-Ray. If they really backed Blu-Ray, it would cost a fortune (albeit not as much as Apple).

This persecution must end!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.