This survey just raises questions about the veracity of the data. Go to consumer reports to get unbiased info.
there is some gay sex going to happen between those two smiling boys.
I'll bet a significant percentage of those survey participants were non-tech-savvy women, who bought an iPhone primarily because they consider it a fashion accessory.
That is the gayest picture I've ever seen! LOL
Verizon signs up more new subscribers than AT&T
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20011540-260.html
Whoops!
Lol, sign up just to post that?![]()
I don't know anyone who's happy with AT&T - I know multiple people who are dumping the iOS platform and switching to Droid - just to get acceptable carrier performance.
Those same people have said - the moment they go somewhere other than LA - it's fine. But in LA - it's just unacceptable.
I know from first hand experience via my iPad 3G - that there is NO - ZERO 3G signal in or around my house in NE Pasadena. So an iPhone 4 isn't even an option for me.
Apple proved no such thing. There are many phones that do not suffer from the same level of signal loss.
Nice try though. Anyone who actually defends Apple like this thinks of their iPhone as a more of a status symbol and less of an actual communications device.
We were visiting with my parents last week and trying to get them to get an iPhone 4 so we could FaceTime with the grandkids. AT&T is so bad that my Mom, who is 65 years old and a generally nice and docile person said to me recently - "I will not get an iPhone". Why Mom? "Is it on AT&T?" Yes, Mom it is. "Hell no" But Mom? "No way. Never again. I will not go back to AT&T. They were horrible. I'm sorry. NO WAY."
Seriously? AT&T sucks.
Tell me about it, I'm in Cisco Texas, 50 miles east of Abilene, 120 west of Fort Worth and have 5 bars of 3G! Oh, wait...you meant I shouldn't have it. Nevermind. I guess i'll turn 3G off so I can be in EDGE like I guess I'm supposed to be.
Not to sound unsympathetic, but it cracks me up when people in New York or SF or LA complain about their cell network. Well, boo hoo. You chose to live in a big, congested city. That's your choice. That's why I'm happy with my mid-sized city and my 10-minute commute to work and the non-stressed cell phone networks and my city not requiring 3 years' worth of red tape to get through to build new towers. It's like complaining about traffic. What exactly do you expect? It comes with the territory.
Uh-huh. Sure it is.![]()
I don't know anyone who's happy with AT&T - I know multiple people who are dumping the iOS platform and switching to Droid - just to get acceptable carrier performance.
Those same people have said - the moment they go somewhere other than LA - it's fine. But in LA - it's just unacceptable.
I know from first hand experience via my iPad 3G - that there is NO - ZERO 3G signal in or around my house in NE Pasadena. So an iPhone 4 isn't even an option for me.
That is the gayest picture I've ever seen! LOL
What part of LA? I had no problem with my Canadian iPhone on AT&T in West Hollywood, Beverly Hills or the Universal lot.I don't know anyone who's happy with AT&T - I know multiple people who are dumping the iOS platform and switching to Droid - just to get acceptable carrier performance.
Those same people have said - the moment they go somewhere other than LA - it's fine. But in LA - it's just unacceptable.
I know from first hand experience via my iPad 3G - that there is NO - ZERO 3G signal in or around my house in NE Pasadena. So an iPhone 4 isn't even an option for me.
I think this proves that just like with the Antennagate issue....a minority that screams the loudest can seem larger than it actually is.
Apple proved no such thing. There are many phones that do not suffer from the same level of signal loss.
Nice try though. Anyone who actually defends Apple like this thinks of their iPhone as a more of a status symbol and less of an actual communications device.