Because these people have (likely) never used a Garmin and pull their anecdotes from websites where people go to complain.
Wrong. 910XT, Fenix 3, 935, 945 and two Garmin Edge bike computers (800, 820).
Because these people have (likely) never used a Garmin and pull their anecdotes from websites where people go to complain.
tsk tsk - and still not a real runner 😁Wrong. 910XT, Fenix 3, 935, 945 and two Garmin Edge bike computers (800, 820).
True. Maybe the next 30 years of running make me one. But maybe not. The last 30 were not successful either.tsk tsk - and still not a real runner 😁
I started tracking with the iPod + Nike kit first - before that no tracking of speed or anything so was a pretty big shift for me. After that jumped on the dedicated Nike+ WatchTrue. Maybe the next 30 years of running make me one. But maybe not. The last 30 were not successful either.
Btw, long before Garmin released their first watch I tracked my runs with a Nike footpod. Not the one they had a cooperation with Apple and their iPods. Years before they sold a very big footpod together with a watch. Excellent battery life and very stable. ;-)
Good old times. Back then we made the distinction between runners and joggers based on if you are able to run 10k sub 40 and not on what watch you wear or not.![]()
Cool.I started tracking with the iPod + Nike kit first - before that no tracking of speed or anything so was a pretty big shift for me. After that jumped on the dedicated Nike+ Watch
View attachment 2472550
again pretty big upgrade and from there Apple Watches so haven't been in the Garmin camp - and as long as I don't qualify for UTMB I don't really need longer GPS-active battery life than the Ultra series can handle.
Wrong.Also, if you charge a watch every day, after a year the battery is going to be on the decline. Most Garmin devices can last 3-4 years before the battery takes a serious hit because their battery isn't subject to as many charge cycles.
Certainly not good. Maybe it's good I returned the Fenix and got the Instinct 3, lol.Seems Garmin is burning down right now. This message is on all their forums, Fenix 8, 7, Epix, etc:
View attachment 2476726
No updates delivered, seems to have started out of the blue.
Great software quality.
Certainly not good. Maybe it's good I returned the Fenix and got the Instinct 3, lol.
That’s the great garmin software quality. At least the battery life is still good on some devices. Mine is still not good if not shocking bad 😂
Mine is fine. Just tried to start an activity and no issues. Garmin pulled the faulty GPS cache file.Instinct 3 is also affected once the faulty satellite data is delivered:
![]()
The Big Garmin Watch Crash Issue (Jan 2025): Explainer & Fixes
Here I was, just minding my own business trying to take photos for my Instinct 3 review, when some, but not all, of the watches kept crashing and rebooting every time I opened up the sports menu. Little didwww.dcrainmaker.com
Good luck!
A true „Adventure Watch“.Mine is fine. Just tried to start an activity and no issues. Garmin pulled the faulty GPS cache file.
Ah! Now I get the point with the true adventure watch. And remember. Only for real sports people out there. 🤣 In the meanwhile I am still running and biking with my AWU with 30k runs and 80k last week + biking. With real health functions and stable software 😎. Back to the topic: Way too expensive for the short battery life and weak and inaccurate functions. Sorry garminA true „Adventure Watch“.
Glad that your watch is working.
And remember. Only for real sports people out there. 🤣 In the meanwhile I am still running and biking with my AWU with 30k runs and 80k last week + biking.
So what’s the cause?
The same cause it was a four years ago when this happened: The satellite pre-cache file (also called the CPE or EPO file). Basically, that’s the file that the GPS chipset uses to more quickly find GPS satellites. In a world before pre-cache files, it would take 20-60 seconds. Now, it takes 1-3 seconds. Think of it like a cheat sheet for the sky/satellites.
That file gets updated on your watch every few days, and generally goes stale within a week. However, if a bad version of the file gets delivered, then chaos can ensue – as we saw a few years ago, when it impacted far more than just Garmin, but also Suunto, Polar, Wahoo, COROS, and others on the Sony chipset at the time. In the case of back-then, this resulted in offset GPS tracks, rather than instant restarts of the watch. While your watch only receives a new file every few days, new CPE files are generated by the server daily, and thus the variability on whether or not your watch has the offending file or not.
This is not how that works. Garmin delivers a product and is accountable for the product. No one cares who they subcontracted.This would be like blaming Apple for a bug in an Intel chip or when Apple had issues with NVIDIA chips. Everyone in the business has to use subcontractors for certain things in their products.
A top quality company is supposed to test before deploying anything …So according to DCRainmaker the cause of this bootloop is a bad CPE file which is provided to all companies using that GPS chipset. This has happened in the past and to more than just Garmin.
Seems really poor form to blame this on Garmin. This would be like blaming Apple for a bug in an Intel chip or when Apple had issues with NVIDIA chips. Everyone in the business has to use subcontractors for certain things in their products.
Now we can reboot our Garmin watches, go back to using them or perhaps we can digress to the alleged forever cancer chemicals in certain Apple Watch bands.
I mean if we want to go there on every little issue I guess we can or we can enjoy using this stuff and realize no software or company bats 1.000.
For me comparable to the Crowdstrike desaster last summer. Faulty config file crashes a multitude of devices.It’s a major fail…
It’s less critical than crowdstrike, it won’t stop critical computers, it’s just about sport metrics …For me comparable to the Crowdstrike desaster last summer. Faulty config file crashes a multitude of devices.
And also a major security concern for supply chain attacks. Obviously no proper testing and checking what they deliver to their customers and no fault tolerant devices rejecting flawed config files.
Don’t underestimate that. The Garmin watches are internet connected devices. One could do a lot of bad things with them if compromised.It’s less critical than crowdstrike, it won’t stop critical computers, it’s just about sport metrics …
But it’s a major fail for such company…
A top quality company is supposed to test before deploying anything …
It’s not a « niche » bug, it combines widespread + main sport watch feature broken.
It’s easy to test as it immediately breaks the GPS on all watches, it’s not a feature that fails in a specific case.
It’s a major fail…
Garmin is lucky to be « just « Garmin, I can’t imagine the scandal if this kind of problem occurred on an Apple device…
Exactly that’s the case. Garmin outage on their service so many times. The customers doesn’t even care. All those software bugs. It’s crazy how bad Garmins service is. The other way round it would be never ever a „small“ thing. And again: The main reason is here the utopia prices for those watches. Not acceptable at allGarmin is lucky to be « just « Garmin, I can’t imagine the scandal if this kind of problem occurred on an Apple device…
I didn't recognize the term AW Ultra, and the answer I got, "Andy Williams", is probably not what you're referring toI had been holding out for a new Fenix but with today’s silly pricing I’m thinking the AW Ultra would be a better choice. Think I’m done with Garmin. Let’s hope Apple don’t take a leaf out of Garmins books and have silly pricing for the AWU3, what’s your thoughts on all this?
Tbh if I could get a discount on the AWU2 when the 3 comes out I’d bite the bullet.