Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Since I'm the Engadget commenter who made the image this article refers to, I'll explain the thought process that led to the conclusion the battery MAYBE removable. Now I'll warn you, this may be long and I'm explaining why the battery being replaceable seems likely, not necessarily likeable.

The first thing that stuck out when I saw the phone was the seam beside the headphone jack. It seemed completely random and unable to serve any useful purpose so I turned to the internal shots to gain some insight as to why it was there. While looking at the internals, I noticed one of the seams on the bottom wasn't actually anything more than an aesthetic marking.

Now, prototypes aren't always going to look like the finally product. If the seams were byproducts of a handmade prototype, then it seemed very odd to me that they would go to the trouble of putting a marking on the opposite side to balance out a seam that wouldn't even exist in the final product. So, believing that the seams were important I noticed the fact that the ones that were broken through form an L shape directly around the battery. Surprise, maybe it's removable to access the battery I thought? Now, the battery directly adjacent to this seemingly removable edge happens to appear to have a slide in connection port, not the soldered in connection of the past (I've updated the image to show where I mean).

iphone%204g.jpg


Now, at this point I'm pretty sure this thing has a removable battery. I think this L shaped cover opens up, but at no point have I considered how it might be opened. I notice another anomaly of the phone, "what's that pin-hole by the headphone jack"? The iPad has a microphone in that exact spot, but what sense would that make on a phone going to be held up to the face? The bottom seems much more likely, and it just so happens to have what appears as two speaker grills. Note these iPhones are pretty jam packed and speakers are generally large as far as components go. Would they really give up so much precious space to have a secondary speaker, only 1.5 inches from the other? It seemed more likely one would be a microphone, whilst the other a speaker.

The next possibility to rule out was that it was a reset pin-hole. Why replace the perfectly understandable/always accessible standard of holding down the power button, as it is now, with a pin-hole that requires a paperclip? Some would say having a pin-hole to access the battery is equally odd, but as it stands you can't access the battery in anyway reasonable so it's definitely a step up. I also considered that the little remote that came with my macbook employed a similar mechanism to access it's battery.

Now, I'm going to admit that when I that made the picture, I never considered the possibility that the pin-hole beside the headphone jack was a secondary microphone for ambient noise detection, and that is certainly a valid possibility. I just feel given how the battery appears to connect to the phone, where it is located, and the fact that one slit is for appearances only make it a very real possibility the battery is removable.

Now, as to the people saying that this prototype has a removable battery but the final design won't, designing such a complex mechanism to remove a battery when the much simpler method of creating a removable backplate to access everything would be much more likely for a prototype. Note that the design considerations for a side removable plate line up with the consumer's needs (avoids mucking about with the bulk of the internals) while a removable back plate lines up with a engineers needs (simple to implement, gives easy to everything).

Now I'll admit that the need to even access the battery is questionable for most consumers, but having the option can hardly be considered a bad thing. What do we give up to have a replaceable battery? One little ugly seam, more likely less apparent than it is on this prototype, and two others that actually look pretty good. All this talk of loosing rigidity is baseless given that this design already seems much more rigid than previous the incarnations of the iPhone. Heck, maybe this design is just the european version given their possible mandate (which is admittedly old) to push for removable batteries in cellphones.
 

This link is old and out of date. Various revisions have been made to this directive, which has the aim of reducing hazadous materials going to landfill.

There are details of the latest revision here,http://www.element-14.com/community...d/10692-5-3836/Battery Directive Mar10v5..pdf , which still makes it clear that the impact on design has yet to be defined so I would doubt any manufacturer would change their design principles yet.

As long as the manufacturer puts in place easy methods for replacement and disposal of batteries, then they current comply with all current legislation. Apple has a battery replacement and disposal policy which is both supplied in user manuals, but also on their websites, for example;
http://www.apple.com/uk/iphone/how-to/index.html#resources.disposal-and-recycling-information

There is therefore, no need for Apple to implement user removable batteries.

Phil
 
i don't even need to read the text to know these are all fakes. those stupid looking buttons on the side, easily removable battery and brushed metal perimeter all look like non-apple design. also all the specs sound like fanboy wishes and are based on nothing more than blurry photos from sources that were never 100% accurate.
 
Removable battery? LOL

There's a better chance of Sarah Palin becoming the next Jeopardy! champion.
 
I really like the look of it, but I tend to like straight lines a lot more than swoops (think Deco or Craftsman style) That being said, I much prefer the look of my original iPhone to the 3G's. It looks as though this new iPhone will be a suitable replacement.
 
No Way

Oh come on! The new MBPs and the iPad do not have replaceable batteries. There is no way Apple adds this feature to the iPhone if they don't add the feature to products that actually need replaceable batteries.
 
They need to compete with competitors. It is only logical for their phone where the environment is much more hostile compared to mp3 players or computers for them to skimp on design for audience.

I have owned many mobile phones in my life and never once did I need to replace the battery.
 
I really hope this isn't legit. I have a good feeling these pics are fake and the next iteration of the iPhone will be sexier and sleeker (I mean, that's just Apple's style) than the 3GS. However, if this actually is legit, I'm going to be buying an Android device...
 
I vote

No user removable battery. Apple has not included this because it is a rarely used feature. They have not with the first iPod and every iPod since, the iPod mini, the iPod nano, the iPod touch. And on and on and on. Not even with the iPad or MBPs.

I can only see 2 scenarios to include this mostly useless feature - Steve Jobs has become convinced it is more "green" to have a user replaceable battery OR the battery life is SO bad that that you need to swap batteries to get it to last.

Those who claim Apple is responding to competition - Apple's competitors have had user replaceable batteries and the consumers have never cared. I really doubt they care any more about this feature now. It is just not that useful to have a user replaceable battery.

If it exists - its a green thing because there is not any other reason.

I see some people already beat me the green angle...so I concur - only reason for something so lamely un-necessary.
 
They need to compete with competitors. It is only logical for their phone where the environment is much more hostile compared to mp3 players or computers for them to skimp on design for audience.

Apple has gone this far without a removable battery and holds 25% US share, and about to grab a helluva lot more with the next iPhone. They've proven that a removable battery is not a premiere feature for a phone, nor one that is necessary.

iPod Touches don't have removable batteries. Macbook Pros don't have removable batteries. iPads don't have removable batteries. There is no reason for the iPhone to suddenly have one.
 
Let's be smart here.

Does that look like a product that Apple would release? Is that design/form/etc. commiserate to the standard you expect from Apple?

No.

Who makes the iPhone?

Apple.

Then, is it the next iPhone?

No.
 
And to the people who are complaining about it not being rounded on the sides, where were you people when everyone was complaining that Apple made the edges rounded on the 3G so you couldn't type and what not with it sitting on a surface? I liked the flat back of the original iPhone, and it never felt awkward in my hand. That's just being nitpicky.

The first iphone still had rounded edges though, it wasn't sharp corners on the edge (when you are talking about holding it that matters). That's the part I think would feel awkward in the hand. And personally, I like the 3G's design over the first one *shrug*.
 
Hey Arn,
When the new phone comes out,why not post links to these threads on the front page?It'll make for some hilarious reading!
 
all I know is that I have been in need of a new phone for the last several months, and the only thing that'd prevent me from replacing it with the next iPhone is if this ends up being more than just a prototype enclosure... good grief, what a clunky-looking design.

I'm also trying to figure out why this is the first flash-based i-device from Apple to not follow the 2x storage bump trend (i.e. 4/8/16/32/64GB, etc.), though I'd gladly take an 80GB iPhone over one with only 64GB of storage... like quite a few people have said, something about this recent round of photos makes me really doubt that this device (whatever it is) is at all related to the next iPhone.
 
Am I the only one who DOESN'T want a user-replaceable battery? I feel like it will affect the phone's design in a bad way.

never needed to replace a battery. And the entire battery just clips out of the back of my phone. Actually, it's more annoying than anything because when it get's dropped the battery pops off.

Okay, if we are going to assume it has a removable back then what is the point of having the SIM card tray on the side of the case if you could just access it from the back? It also seems like glass or ceramic would be cost prohibitive compared polymer.

Not to mention EVERY other Apple product is designed around aluminum - save MB.

I'm assuming many users here on MacRumors have worked in graphic design or ..

Industrial Design;)

It's kind of like that. I look at this and get the sense that it's someone trying their hardest to achieve that Apple gestalt, but it's just not there--not for me at least. So without any real reason that I can verbalize, I'm leaning toward disbelieving it.

I know exactly what you mean. If it's actually out of Apple it's a non-production test case.

There is absolutely no possible way this is 4. Apple would not allow such a weak piece of industrial design sport their elite marquee. Jesus ****ing christ, it is understood to be stored predominantly in pocket, that's why its smooth, weathered shape has been become more so through the two generations. That thing looks like it was born by Zenith. Jesus ****ing christ.

How could Macrumors.com, my favoritest website ever, publish 3 sequential main page articles about this obviously fictitious farce on my lazy Sunday? Oh wait… Hold on… Pretty clear here; because they are a tool of Apple inc, ya know, by giving Mr. Kim "candy." Propagating this silliness is in big fruits best interest, as the real one might better melt panties in comparison with this product design student at community college, hungover deadline throw-together. The eyelet ringing the headphone jack is an obvious Apple no-do. It's not a cassette WalkMan, right? Jesu…

Basic homo-sapien logic deduces as far as much that the new item will have a button on the side that shortcuts immediately to camera, or other assignable app of user choosing. Holding button will call up "photos." Everybody knows that - even elderly, possibly out of touch, technology columnists for a prominent southern Manhattan publication.

Have a good day.

I love it.
 
Zirconia backing?

My kids Lacrosse stick is made out of Zirconium, which has a similar appearance as that photo, is light as can be, and is pretty tough (lacrosse kids beat the crap out of each other with their sticks - no dents and a couple of little scratches).

I'm not sure if its the same material or not, but if it is, you don't have much to worry about dropping it on its back.

Look at the bottom Photo

What's nice about it, is that it has a natural texture, which makes it less slippery (not really non-slip) along the lines of the 1st gen iPhone, and doesn't show fingerprints.

A little info on it here
 
It's hard for me to believe that Apple would create this removable side plate for the battery and not also find a way to use it for the SIM card. Given their focus on "clean lines", it just seems unlikely that they would have an external SIM access point *and* a separate external battery access point.

Also, I hope this isn't the final design. It has the same form factor as a dozen other phones on the market. I always loved the slightly rounded back and thin edges of the 3G/3GS.
 
I was just about to post that Gizmodo link. It looks legitimate, folks. I fear for the safety of someone inside of Apple's headquarters though. This thing was obviously not supposed to leak this early.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7E18 Safari/528.16)

Regarding the durability/crack-resistance of ceramic, check out Corelle plates/cups/etc. They're curved, made from ceramic, and damned near impossible to break or crack. Personally, I think it would be a good choice for a phone back, as you could also take advantage of some of the inherent stiffness and strength to provide the structure of the phone.
 
I was just about to post that Gizmodo link. It looks legitimate, folks. I fear for the safety of someone inside of Apple's headquarters though. This thing was obviously not supposed to leak this early.

I was about to post that link, too...I'm pretty convinced this is legit now. Whichever Apple employee was tasked with testing that thing in the field is now probably under the microscope of a lot of people.
 
OMG it looks legit and amazing on the video posted on the gizmodo site! but i'm afraid now that it leaked it might get a redo .. who knows with steve
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.