Perfect legal desktop mac for 200$(Atom processor included!)
Note: Its 142$ if you have a hard drive already!!!!
http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=113623 is the guide
and here is the newegg wishlist for an easier time getting the goods
click here
comes out to 202$ pesos.
This works flawlessly no problems, wireless can be done easily too.
Here is the wireless card, dont get asus card that I am linking from the newegg because they charge 50$ and this compumusic that I am linking charges 21$
http://www.compumusic.com/p445016.htm
*or spend $500 and get an msi wind, same processor and it will be leopard compatible*
Here is the software needed run the new desktop mac you have (can be legal too!)
This is a Leopard Compatible hackintosh
Get Kalyways from the pirayte bay spelled intentionally incorrect, type kalyways into search query
or Install OSX from retail disk- Legal Method!
Click here
Now for all of the haters who think this can never be legal:
EULA mac approved hardware....ok.... there is a sticker that comes with the osx disk..... just put the sticker on the computer now it's mac approved..... done.....
Eulas very commonly are lawful. There is nothing in EU-US law that makes them unenforceable. It depends on the provisions they contain.
There are two or three things they cannot do, not because they are Eulas, but because no contract which is a condition of sale which tries to do that will be lawful in the EU. Not even if you personally read and sign it before you open the package.
The first thing is, no post sales restrictions on use of a purchased product will be valid. Once you have bought it, you can do what you like with it, within the laws of the land. So, Apple does not have to sell copies of OSX by itself. But having done so, it cannot tell you what to run it on. And it cannot get around this by pretending that though you have walked out the shop with a CD and no further payment obligations, you have in fact leased or licensed it and not bought it. It is a purchase. The reason for this is very simple: if a car manufacturer could impose post sales restrictions on use, it would, and would force you to buy parts only from it. If a tool supplier could do it, it could make you buy the pro versions before you could legally use them in way of trade. Etc.
This is one thing. The second thing is it cannot force you to lower your statutory rights under consumer protection and trade law in consideration of selling to you. So whatever your rights are about warranty, return and so on, you still have them, no matter what the Eula or any other agreement says.
The conclusion of this is very simple. If OSX really does run unmodified under KQEMU, there is nothing Apple can do to stop anyone running a purchased copy of it that way. Nothing.
The same thing applies to running MS Office under Wine. It makes no difference what any purchase agreement says, MS cannot stop you running one lawfully purchased copy of Office under Wine. Or any other emulator.
As the last example shows, before getting too enthusiastically convinced that Apple should be able to stop you running OSX on any other hardware, think about the implications a bit. To do it, you'd have to give similar rights to all sorts of other people for whom you might feel rather less enthusiasm....