Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm so not looking forward to ESPN Radio's Colin Cowherd calling the Reds a team of frauds the rest of this postseason. :rolleyes: Mind you, Cowherd's right: I looked up the regular season of the Reds on MLB.com and they really padded their win-loss record by beating up on a LOT of bad teams in the NL Central; their record against any decent NL team (Giants, Padres, Rockies, Cardinals and Phillies) was just atrocious.
 
I'm so not looking forward to ESPN Radio's Colin Cowherd calling the Reds a team of frauds the rest of this postseason. :rolleyes: Mind you, Cowherd's right: I looked up the regular season of the Reds on MLB.com and they really padded their win-loss record by beating up on a LOT of bad teams in the NL Central; their record against any decent NL team (Giants, Padres, Rockies, Cardinals and Phillies) was just atrocious.

Yeah, that's how the Reds got in. For some reason, the Cardinals couldn't beat the terrible teams (look up our records vs the Cubs, Pirates and Nationals) but did quite well against the good teams like the Phillies and the Reds.

I don't know if the Cardinals would've beaten the Phillies in the playoffs, but I don't think they would've rolled over and died like that. And I don't think they would've been no-hit by Halladay either. They would've put up a decent fight.
 
Yeah, that's how the Reds got in. For some reason, the Cardinals couldn't beat the terrible teams (look up our records vs the Cubs, Pirates and Nationals) but did quite well against the good teams like the Phillies and the Reds.

I don't know if the Cardinals would've beaten the Phillies in the playoffs, but I don't think they would've rolled over and died like that. And I don't think they would've been no-hit by Halladay either. They would've put up a decent fight.

Sorry dude but I don't think even your Card's would of beat Hamels last night;)He was DEAL'N...:cool:

Your Blue's are off to a good start...:)
GO PHILS...
 
Sorry dude but I don't think even your Card's would of beat Hamels last night;)He was DEAL'N...:cool:

I didn't say that ;)

I said the Cardinals probably would've put up a better fight, not win. I think they'd still lose the series, but probably wouldn't be swept (I think they would've won against Oswalt, he didn't have his best stuff and the Phillies only won because of multiple Reds errors and hit by pitches) and probably would't have been no-hit. The Reds just looked like they gave up at the very start of the series.
 
I didn't say that ;)

I said the Cardinals probably would've put up a better fight, not win. I think they'd still lose the series, but probably wouldn't be swept (I think they would've won against Oswalt, he didn't have his best stuff and the Phillies only won because of multiple Reds errors and hit by pitches) and probably would't have been no-hit. The Reds just looked like they gave up at the very start of the series.

I don't know about the gaving up thing,but the Red's did have that "Deer in the Headlights" look:rolleyes: Actually they looked like the Phils did four years ago when we got sweep by the Rockies:eek:

Peace
 
I don't know about the gaving up thing,but the Red's did have that "Deer in the Headlights" look:rolleyes: Actually they looked like the Phils did four years ago when we got sweep by the Rockies:eek:

Peace

I guess they just aren't used to playing baseball in October. It's only been what, 15 years? If the Reds get swept after a 15 year postseason hiatus, then what would the Pirates do if they ever make it to the playoffs? I think they would forget to show up to the game :D
 
I wanna see Yanks vs. Giants in the World Series. Tim Lincecum amazed me the other night and I haven't really watched many of their games, so I was VERY impressed. I think it will probably be Yanks vs. Phillies again, though.

This will be most boring if it's NY and Philly especially since that's how many thought it would be late in the regular season.

But if it comes down to that most likely match up, I give it to NY in 6.
 
The Braves REALLY miss Prado's defense and bat :(

i'll have to agree. losing prado was pretty much it for this team. too many injuries. and bobby is getting alot of heat for this one. one of my friends who was at the game was so disappointed by the ending.

This will be most boring if it's NY and Philly especially since that's how many thought it would be late in the regular season.

But if it comes down to that most likely match up, I give it to NY in 6.

i sure hope it's not phillies vs yankees again. not saying it's not going to be a good series, but it will bore me to death.
 
This will be most boring if it's NY and Philly especially since that's how many thought it would be late in the regular season.

But if it comes down to that most likely match up, I give it to NY in 6.

Boring to you maybe:rolleyes: Not to me,I want some payback...:D:cool:
 
Boring to you maybe:rolleyes: Not to me,I want some payback...:D:cool:

If the Yankees get past whoever they face soon, then it's most likely they will face the Phillies. If both teams retain a lot of their top players in the next few years, there will be more than one chance for Philly to beat the Yankees for "payback". That almost seems pretty sure.

Yes, and also the Yankees "buying" a Philly player or two. :)

I am now looking for the rather unlikely event of my Giants beating Philly coming up. Philly seems to look terribly good, and New York has all those future Hall of Famers, as is usually the case in any Yankee generation of teams.

Take a wild guess who is the most likely two to end up in the World Series this year?

The least likely matchup I think is the Giants vs. the Rangers, which I think will be of more interest to the fans who didn't see their team get in. If it's the Yankees vs. the Phillies again, sure it will be a tough fight, but predictable. The team who has a slump in the World Series if it's those two teams in there will be the loser. We already know Philly and New York are great and there should be no surprises there. So to me, that's pretty boring.

If New York is that perennial team in blue winning all the time (as opposed to the sometimes dominant Los Angeles Dodgers every now and then), the perennial dynasty wearing the red uniform (which used to be Boston) will probably now be Philly.

2007 NL East Champions
2008 WS win
2009 WS loss
2010 NLCS appearance


Before the Phillies are traded out and aged, I see at least two more NCLS appearances, more that two NL East championships, and another World Series win.
 
and the 2010 braves season is over. despite my complaints, it was a fun ride, and i actually enjoyed the playoffs. it's not like the early 2000's where we dominate the division and fall apart once the playoffs hit. we simply weren't good enough this year, and were injured. too bad we won't have bobby cox again next season. it was a nice ride bobby.:(
 
I don't really think any World Series will be boring! Of course, I just got into Baseball last season after going my whole 26 years of life without even liking sports. So yeah, no series will be boring for me. :cool:

That said, I'm glad the Giants won their game tonight and I really hope they can beat the Phillies. But even though the Giants won, I was sad for Bobby Cox. Originally, I was hoping they would go all the way since it was his last year. That was before I saw Tim Lincecum pitch. lol But yeah, at least they did make it to the Postseason in his last run as manager. He will surely be missed by all baseball fans. Good guy..

You guys think the Rangers will beat the Rays today?
 
If your a Philly fan like me, what more could you ask for Halladay vs "The Freak" on Sat:cool:IN OUR HOUSE...:p South Philly will be ROCK'N...:D

To be honest, the Giants scare me a little bit:rolleyes: Just a little bit...:rolleyes:

Peace
 
If your a Philly fan like me, what more could you ask for Halladay vs "The Freak" on Sat:cool:IN OUR HOUSE...:p South Philly will be ROCK'N...:D

To be honest, the Giants scare me a little bit:rolleyes: Just a little bit...:rolleyes:

Peace

Should be a fantastic matchup, regardless of which side you're supporting. Can't wait!
 
Congrats to the Rangers, who finally won their first postseason series after all these years.

Boy, I can't wait for the Giants / Phillies. The two teams played each other even during the regular season (3-3), the Giants hit their top starters pretty well, and they've historically hit Oswalt pretty well. This is the postseason, and it's going to be a big challenge. I don't think I see my Giants winning it, but I'm hoping for a competitive, exciting series.
 
Well the ALCS I think the Yanks benefit more from this now that the Rangers in Cause the rays have have Garza and Price, Lee is the rangers only real pitching threat and they will not probably face them till game 4 I would be stunned if we see lee Sooner than that.
 
Congrats to the Rangers, who finally won their first postseason series after all these years.

Boy, I can't wait for the Giants / Phillies. The two teams played each other even during the regular season (3-3), the Giants hit their top starters pretty well, and they've historically hit Oswalt pretty well. This is the postseason, and it's going to be a big challenge. I don't think I see my Giants winning it, but I'm hoping for a competitive, exciting series.

I guess the Rangers were the last active team to get a series like this off their back. Good for them. Every inning from now on will be new postseason territory for them. Even if they don't win the WS, getting past the Yankees in the ALCS will be something for their clubhouse to remember for years to come.

San Francisco is going to fight for every inch and I don't have an issue with worrying about Lincecum losing, it's just that the other SF pitchers are not him. Actually, no young pitcher in baseball history has come out and won the Cy Young on their first full year on the roster in the majors. And then he repeats the feat. There's a reason they call him the freak. I hope he's not remembered merely as the best young pitcher of all time with two Cy Youngs in the first two full seasons as a young gun, and I hope we see him winning a couple of more Cy Youngs over a long, productive career. If he stays healthy, I think he can be another Nolan Ryan or Sandy Koufax.

I think San Francisco is going to have to up both their pitching with the other pitchers, and increase their hitting for average, if they are to pose a credible threat to the Phillies.

There's no doubt about the Phillies having a dynasty right now and the here and now is their big, red machine. They are imposing and most expect them to win and get into the World Series. If the Phillies win the WS, this lineup will be compared to the awesome lineup the Red Sox had in the 2000s with two rings and being a threat for a couple of more.
 
I wanna see Yanks vs. Giants in the World Series. Tim Lincecum amazed me the other night and I haven't really watched many of their games, so I was VERY impressed. I think it will probably be Yanks vs. Phillies again, though.

I would rather see the Rangers vs. Giants in the World Series. I'm getting tired of seeing the Yankees and Phillies.
 
There's no doubt about the Phillies having a dynasty right now and the here and now is their big, red machine. They are imposing and most expect them to win and get into the World Series. If the Phillies win the WS, this lineup will be compared to the awesome lineup the Red Sox had in the 2000s with two rings and being a threat for a couple of more.

I think they will be compared to the 1996-2001 Yankees. If you want to talk about a dynasty, that is the dynasty to compare teams to in modern day.

I want Giant-Yankees WS. Get the old NY rivalry going.
 
I think they will be compared to the 1996-2001 Yankees. If you want to talk about a dynasty, that is the dynasty to compare teams to in modern day.

I want Giant-Yankees WS. Get the old NY rivalry going.
The rivalry that really needs a kick start is Yankees Dodgers. With Mattingly taking the wheel it would make for some great world series drama.

Screw playing the Mets in interleauge lets play the Dodgers once a year.
 
I think they will be compared to the 1996-2001 Yankees. If you want to talk about a dynasty, that is the dynasty to compare teams to in modern day.

I want Giant-Yankees WS. Get the old NY rivalry going.

Wow, I can't see anybody being like that crew. During that time, some say it's the best group of guys in baseball, ever. Division wins with expectation for no less, close to unparalleled pitching, hitting in the 300s consistently, four WS wins. That's a Yankees dynasty among dynasties.

When the Phillies get at least three wins in five tries in the World Series in a similarly short time, then I may put them in the same sentence as that crew from New York. Anyway, I don't ever remember the Phillies striking so much fear in an opponent. They are probably like Boston was not long ago, and may become like that '96-2001 Yankees lineup. In that period the Yankees also have four AL pennant wins in a row, also very hard to achieve even though their four WS wins were not in a row. Any way one looks at it, the Yankees put up great numbers.

The Phillies could conceivably win the WS, but then they would have to win that series again, and at least show up one, if not two, more times, as runner up, to make themselves synonymous with the championship as the go to NL contender. I know if the Yankees don't win the WS this year, a lot of people will still consider them an early season favorite next year to go the distance.

Philly can be a couple of bad trades away from mediocrity, but the Yankees have never been that vulnerable. When the Yanks didn't measure up, it wasn't because they could not get players. :)

That being said, a team like San Francisco or Seattle are a player away from being as good as Philly now. Let's say the Giants get someone like Ichiro or Pujols or another Lincecum. With just one addition of or near that caliber would make the Giants the NL team to beat, not the "underdog" in the NLCS. If the Mariners got a Lincecum, they would be right up there as a major threat in their division.

We SF fans got a lot of mileage just on Barry Bonds, a single (yet juiced up) player. If only our pitching or hitting was a little better some years ago, SF would have cleaned out the Angels in the World Series. It could come down to just one great player or a couple of good players playing their potential.

SF will have to play their very best baseball, and not just the stuff they put up against Atlanta, to get past the Phillies and then win the AL team on the other side. I am not even thinking World Series right now, as the Phillies, one game at a time, is scary enough.
 
Wow, I can't see anybody being like that crew. During that time, some say it's the best group of guys in baseball, ever. Division wins with expectation for no less, close to unparalleled pitching, hitting in the 300s consistently, four WS wins. That's a Yankees dynasty among dynasties.

How about the crew that won 5 WS titles in a row? People complain about the Yankees today, but they're still not like the Yankees of past. They don't know the word dominant until they see the 1923-1962 Yankees. They never saw a drought of WS titles bigger then 4 years. They absolutely dominated back then.

While I don't think anyone would say the Phillies dynasty will be compared as to being equals to the 1996-2001 Yankees, but if there is a dynasty in modern baseball teams to compare to, it is them. You can't say the Red Sox had a dynasty. Yeah they won in '04 and '07, but they got their butts handed to them in between those times. It is more like they really had things going for them in those years they won the WS. It was either '05 or '06 we had the Boston Massacre 2.0 where the Yankees swept them 4 in a row effectively knocking them out of the AL East contention and wild card.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.