whocares said:Yeah, I think XIII has nailed the solution.
"final": ban for the team from next World Cup?![]()
![]()
![]()
Indeed.
I doubt any football association would have the balls to implement a player banning scheme though..
whocares said:Yeah, I think XIII has nailed the solution.
"final": ban for the team from next World Cup?![]()
![]()
![]()
MacsRgr8 said:MORE IMPORTANT: Ref: Benito Archundia Tellez, from Mexico
MacsRgr8 said:Predictions:
2-1, and 4-2 (so, 2 reds for Ukraine, 1 for Switzerland, and 4 yellows versus 2)![]()
Patmian212 said:We certaily did not struggle, aussies had 2 shots on goal, with 10 men. 1 thing is struggling another is playing discretely. But I do agree we did play great.
XIII said:Indeed.
I doubt any football association would have the balls to implement a player banning scheme though..
whocares said:Finalmente un altro italiano! Mi sento meno solo.![]()
XIII said:Do you get the keep the ref's yellow card if you get a hatrick? (3 yellows)
BakedBeans said:...playing controlled defensive football.
XIII said:Do you get the keep the ref's yellow card if you get a hatrick? (3 yellows)
MacsRgr8 said:Problem is also that some decisions will be considered "grey area", i.e. did he dive, or simply fall over?
What about the protests from the clubs afterwards. If Henry "fell over" in the box, and two days later we heard that he was banned from Premiership appearances for 3 games, we would protest, wouldn't we?
It really has to be a blatant dive for it to be led to any banning, i.e. Figo-stuff![]()
dogbone said:Italy, three times winners, not scoring a goal in 90 minutes (or scoring with 10 seconds left in injury time with a contentious penalty) against a team that wasn't supposed to get out of the group stages, and was not playing an overly defensive game, would, in many people's opinions, be classed as 'struggling'.
dogbone said:Italy, three times winners, not scoring a goal in 90 minutes (or scoring with 10 seconds left in injury time with a contentious penalty) against a team that wasn't supposed to get out of the group stages, and was not playing an overly defensive game, would, in many people's opinions, be classed as 'struggling'.
MacsRgr8 said:![]()
Mr. Poll is not happy with you.
whocares said:I think the third should have cancelled out the previous two.![]()
![]()
devman said:As would a team who were gifted 60% of possession, played half the game against 10 men, and could not create a single good chance in almost 95 minutes.
dogbone said:(...) Unless you are suggesting that Italy was playing for penalties and relying on Buffon.
Now, I have to suffer too??XIII said:He'll punish me with a stupid decision to send an Arsenal player off next season.![]()
dogbone said:Isn't defensive football meant to be played when defending a goal?
whocares said:Of course they were also waiting for Australia to attack and then go for the break.
devman said:Yup but that didn't work well because Australia were never able to mount a serious attack - and so the game was quite stifling.
XIII said:But Australia are supposed to struggle - they are, after all, the underdogs.
devman said:so Italy is damned if they do - damned if they don't... che cazzo stai dicendo?