If you're not happy with stuff the BBC's saying in general that's one thing, but I think that singling them out for criticism on this particular story is a little unfair. In the interests of balance, it should be pointed out that it's not just the BBC who is quoting these figures, so if they are as inaccurate as you are saying then quite a few others have also got them wrong.£400m is correct and I saw the interview that Hicks said about it. The BBC comment is more a long term thing in regards to my growing hatred but £150m is utter crap and is a completely bogus figure.
Several other sources such as Sky and several newspapers, including the Liverpool Echo repeat the sum of £150m. Mind, if as you say the projected £400m is for the stadium project (ie redevelopment of the surrounding area too and not just the cost of the new ground itself) then in comparison the Emirates stadium project is said to have cost in the region of £430m, so the scouse version compares well in terms of cost. Mind, those are London prices we're talking about.
Hmm... interesting. I suppose it's very early days of course but is there any talk about who might potentially be coming on board as sponsors?...a large amount to be recouped via naming rights.
Pah! Never mind your fancy new stadium apparently they're looking into fixing the faulty lighting outside ours. Ace....an architectural masterpeice... the detail and thought behind it is stunning... [it's] going to be amazing in person