HATE?!? I couldnt imagine feeling a negative emotion as strong as my LOVE for my Apple products.
Hate is a strong word.
You strike me as someone that hangs out at the Apple store on a Friday night. Give us break, there's always something to hate.
HATE?!? I couldnt imagine feeling a negative emotion as strong as my LOVE for my Apple products.
Hate is a strong word.
The Mighty Mouse is fantastic. But mine broke, so right now I'm using my Logitech G5 Laser. The only thing that's bugged me, is the way OS X interprets mouse acceleration on PC-based mice; that weird way that you move the mouse slowly, and the cursor just creeps along. Luckily, SteerMouse to the rescue.
Moving on to the Mac OS, I hate the transparent title bar in 10.5 and yearn for the one in 10.4. I really do miss it.
As a person who used to do competitive multiplayer FPS, I wholeheartedly agree, the mouse is definitely less responsive in OS X - it's really easy to notice this on my Logitech MX 518. If I simply reboot to XP, it's a huge difference.
But this isn't something everyone notices. Just like graphics designers are demanding about displays and music professionals are touchy about speakers/headphones, some people can notice problems in mouse responsiveness/precision. The superiority of wired mice over wireless ones is a similar dilemma.
I hate that the display cable in my Tibook is probably going and that it's really showing its age. I'd love to get a new Macbook Pro but I'm currently addicted to having a 1680x1050 resolution on a 15" screen. If Apple ever put this on one of their Macbook Pro's, I would be so happy.![]()
I'll give you that. We speak of this in different ways. In games it lags a slight bit. Working with graphics, however, I have no problems with getting it to be accurate.
I think that you have problems with the responsiveness not so much the accuracy. For fast movements it sometimes feels a little slow. This could also be because of the way I have set the acceleration. I should probably have it higher. As far as precision goes in Photoshop, After Effects, and Lightwave it's pixel perfect. Lightwave does feel worse on my Mac than a Windows box, but it is horribly "designed" for the Mac in the first place and running in Rosetta. I'm not sure, but it could also be the difference in dpi between Mac and Windows systems.
By the way, I do retract my previous statement, my wired Mighty Mouse doesn't feel as good as my wired on at work does. I sped up my tracking a bit and it is better though.
1680x1050 is a 16:10 resolution (1680/1050=1.6) and is the standard resolution for 20"-class LCD widescreen monitors. I don't know anything about TiBooks though.1680x1050 screen res is 4:3. TiBooks were 16:10
I have the first gen AlBook and it's res is only 1280x854, which is also the biggest they used in a TiBook. 1680x1050 screen res is 4:3. TiBooks were 16:10 and 4:3 Mac laptops never went that high. Even the current 15" MBP only goes to 1440x900. Are you talking about another computer's screen? Were those two thoughts combined into one paragraph?
1680x1050 is a 16:10 resolution (1680/1050=1.6) and is the standard resolution for 20"-class LCD widescreen monitors. I don't know anything about TiBooks though.
You were three hours late to the party, mister.You totally messed it up. 1680 X 1050 is 16:10 and that's what the mac's use today. He means apple needs to raise the Resolution on the MacBook Pro to 1680 X 1050.
But I was still correct about TiBooks. They stopped at 1280x854, which isn't exactly 16:10 but it's close (it's closer to 16:11). I don't know what res the 15.4" started at, but I bet it was either 16:10 or closer.
TiBooks and 15" alu PowerBook had 15:10 screens, but 1280x854 is not quite 15:10, its all strange![]()
win explorer has an Undo "stack'. I've never gone backwards more than 3 ops, so don't know how many it stores. also, if you do a rename, move etc, in another file-manager, explorer wipes the undo stack. I suspect if you delete from recycle, that kills the stack from the point at which that file was sent to Recycle (FTWDK, recycle is similar to trash). I wonder how other OSes handle this..I didn't know Command-Z worked that way ... but it's only good for the last file trashed. Dang!
im still stuck on how to save my work exactly where i want it
e.g if i make a document in photoshop. i have to save it on my desktop, close down photoshop then drag the file into the folder i wanted it in orginally?
im still stuck on how to save my work exactly where i want it
e.g if i make a document in photoshop. i have to save it on my desktop, close down photoshop then drag the file into the folder i wanted it in orginally?
Not at all... You're doing it way wrong. There's a little triangle next to the desktop at the top of the save dialogue box. That will let you save it anywhere on your computer.
Agreed. Also, I will probably never understand why anyone would want the maximize button to make a window full screen regardless of the contents of said window. The reason for making a window larger is to allow all the content it contains to be displayed at once without scrolling, and that's exactly what the zoom button in OS X accomplishes. It scales the window to fit the content.
i know it's very trendy to be multitasking, having all kind of things going on, but come on.. if i want to focus on one thing, then please let me, and make the freakin window fullscreen.
For the love of God, enough of this "I'm a Mac" brainwashing. Sure, Apple is gaining more market share as a result, but it's also making 90% of the population collectively dumber.
Ask any college kid why s/he likes their mac... 90% of them will answer "it just works". Ask them to explain what that means and you get crickets...
F*CK! It drives me crazy!
Branding Apple as a lifestyle actually discourages me from buying a Mac... then I remember what Windows is like.
But if it "just works" why is there a need for sites like MacFixIt?