Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Idk know about that. Women who are hot look amazing for a LONG time these days. Look at our First Lady!!! She’s stunning
[automerge]1576606154[/automerge]


Well like I said before most people live in the real world.

I could sit around reading philosophy and memorizing fancy GRE words all day but I choose to live in the real world not in books and thought exercises.
Your version of the "real world" is a fantasy created by women that would love to suck the money out of your wallet. Instagram 'influencers' are not the real world, and as @mollyc mentioned, their beauty is not either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech and mollyc
But your idea of the real world is Instagram. And most IG "influencers" aren't real to start with - botox, injections, etc.

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/decade-in-review/the-age-of-instagram-face

And sure, some women stay hot even while aging, but most just turn into boring middle aged women (at least in looks, not necessarily in personality).
If you don’t think a hot Instagram girl looks good in real life, then a girl on Instagram who doesn’t look hot is really in trouble isn’t she?

And what’s wrong with Botox, etc? Why not use everything available to look your best?

Our First Lady is a GREAT example of someone whose older but still hotter than most 20 year olds.
 
Last edited:
Wow....I return from two weeks away and this thread is still going. Maybe it will take a Christmas hiatus...

You didn’t miss anything.😁

On top of that, the OP probably is laughing hysterically, realizing the amount of members that he engulfs in this fantasy world (Thread for that matter) that doesn’t exist about women, Wall Street....well...Just about anything. [Let alone the age bracket that he attempts to portray that isn’t remotely believable.] At this junction, I think it’s more of a desperate attempt just to keep this thread alive for the OP’s own amusement using wealth/women as leverage points to draw reactions from other credible members, which is actually staggering in itself. But as long as he knows, there are those who see right through ‘The Internet curtain’ of living a life that is entirely fictitious.

It’s not my goal to be disingenuous to the thread/members (Or contribute to the fictional events), but I think it’s appropriate to make known what the OP will intentionally ignore valid points to prolong this thread.
 
Your version of the "real world" is a fantasy created by women that would love to suck the money out of your wallet. Instagram 'influencers' are not the real world, and as @mollyc mentioned, their beauty is not either.

Well of course it’s a dream life but it’s very attainable if you have the means to live the lifestyle.

Most people cannot have this.

You have to be successful otherwise it can’t be done.
 
You didn’t miss anything.😁

On top of that, the OP probably is laughing hysterically, realizing the amount of members that he engulfs in this fantasy world (Thread for that matter) that doesn’t exist about women, Wall Street....well...Just about anything. [Let alone the age bracket that he attempts to portray that isn’t remotely believable.] At this junction, I think it’s more of a desperate attempt just to keep this thread alive for the OP’s own amusement using wealth/women as leverage points to draw reactions from other credible members, which is actually staggering in itself. But as long as he knows, there are those who see right through ‘The Internet curtain’ of living a life that is entirely fictitious.

It’s not my goal to be disingenuous to the thread/members (Or contribute to the fictional events), but I think it’s appropriate to make known what the OP will intentionally ignore valid points to prolong this thread.

thank you for bringing me back to reality. which this thread is not.
 

Agree with you.

thank you for bringing me back to reality. which this thread is not.

No, it is not.

And I find it instructive that the OP disputes your knowledge of Wall St, while he argues that anyone who believes that relationships ought to be based on mutual respect, affection and trust does not live in "the real world".
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Agree with you.



No, it is not.

And I find it instructive that the OP disputes your knowledge of Wall St, while he argues that anyone who believes that relationships ought to be based on mutual respect, affection and trust does not live in "the real world".

No I just think that women who are hot are more desired by men than women who are not and thinking otherwise is out of touch with the real world.

Of course most hot women will never be seen with an average guy, hence being nothing more than a mere fantasy for most men. Nothing more than a magazine cover to look at.
 
The way the OP avoids addressing real questions and points of criticism shows to me that he is either making this all up, or is so hopelessly fanatical and stubborn that he will never change.

As far as I am concerned, there is no condo, no Wall Street job, and no woman. This game will only continue as long as people keep replying.

I have grown tired of it.
 
The way the OP avoids addressing real questions and points of criticism shows to me that he is either making this all up, or is so hopelessly fanatical and stubborn that he will never change.

As far as I am concerned, there is no condo, no Wall Street job, and no woman. This game will only continue as long as people keep replying.

I have grown tired of it.

I HAVE changed and so has she and our relationship is MUCH better as a result.
 
I HAVE changed and so has she and our relationship is MUCH better as a result.

No, you haven't. Not at all.

Your posts and threads are full of the exact same words, the same obsessions, and the same delusions as always and ever ("hot", "young woman", "hot young woman", "model", "10", "condo", "Wall St", "money", "wallet", "car",), the only new word I have laid eyes on is "prancing".
 
Last edited:
No, you haven't. Not at all.

Your posts and threads are full of the exact same words, the same obsessions, and the same delusions as always and ever ("hot", "young woman", "hot young woman", "model", "10", "condo", "Wall St", "money", "wallet", "car", ), the only new word I have laid eyes on is "prancing".

Then how do you explain my relationship improving?
 
The way the OP avoids addressing real questions and points of criticism shows to me that he is either making this all up, or is so hopelessly fanatical and stubborn that he will never change.

As far as I am concerned, there is no condo, no Wall Street job, and no woman. This game will only continue as long as people keep replying.

I have grown tired of it.

FTFY. :D

Hahaha, of course not, it's almost like really bad performance art o_O
 
I don't believe that it has; in fact, I doubt that it is even a real relationship.

This is just a pause until the next dramatic act of insane and demanding high maintenance drama (with a starring cast of two).

Wait why don’t you believe it has? I just said it has...

And frankly it’s actually become MUCH better.
 
Wait why don’t you believe it has? I just said it has...

And frankly it’s actually become MUCH better.

Because of the utterly delusional, quite ludicrous and peculiarly repetitive nature of your posts; that, and your vapid values.

Act II, Act III, and Act IV still await us, not to mention the bizarre drama of Act V.

In relationship terms, this is more Groundhog Day than Waiting For Godot.

Please stop the insanity. Just stop posting to this thread. It only fuels hieveryone even more. If no one engages, it will finally die away.

Just stop.

I will stop with everyone else.
I encourage everyone else to do the same. We can't gain anything from this.

This seems an exceedingly reasonable course of action, in the circumstances.
 
If we divorce, we divorce. So what? There’s always others.

But it’d be fun getting married minimally just for the experience, have children, make family happy,etc

Those who are scared of divorce are more likely to divorce.

Really sounds like you're in tune with this whole relationship/god/marriage thing.

I'm sure divorce and splitting custody of said children will be a riot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Because of the utterly delusional, quite ludicrous and peculiarly repetitive nature of your posts; that, and your vapid values.

Act II, Act III, and Act IV still await us, not to mention the bizarre drama of Act V.

In relationship terms, this is more Groundhog Day than Waiting For Godot.





This seems an exceedingly reasonable course of action, in the circumstances.

Oh I see. So basically you think drama will start back up.

Possibly. But so far it’s been good for a long time.

No issues. I credit her changing then me following.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.