Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Then use a dongle and be done with it..It's not worth the argument. Spend the $19.95.

Why? What speed will it offer, what problems will it cause with work related software due to drivers?
As stated earlier in this thread, USB 2 is 480MBPS max, hardly 1000MBPS ethernet speed.
And your having a laugh (OR SERIOUSLY UNDER THE REALITY FIELD) if you think saying a simple, go and buy a $30 adapter comment, is acceptable on a $2000 machine!

I also did a quick google and could not find any USB3 to gigabit ethernet adapters which would lead me to think they are expensive if they are made.

But I guess your a typical Apple fan, ignore common sense and practicality for desirability and sex appeal in design.

But as this is a rumour I call the ditching of the ethernet port BS, unless Apple can come up with an adapter capable of running a 1000mbps and include it with every laptop.
 
Well, guess what. If you start living in the real world outside of a college dorm - you know, the places where you work for your money and tax revenue is generated - you'll notice that VGA ports for instances are still very necessary. You'll find cables to plug in for you presentation in pretty much every conference room in the world. So for your MacBook you then need an adapter. If you forget it you can then email your PowerPoint presentation to a colleague with a PC laptop that still has such an ancient port. That is if you brought your Ethernet to Applebolt adapter because you don't have access rights to the encrypted corporate network. If by then you still have a job and were able to give your colleague the PPT presentation all your little graphics and pictures are all over the place and won't display at all because the standard PowerPoint isn't quite as advanced as you with all your little "QuickTime" gizmos.

But hey, who wants top be a corporate stiff anyway. So you'll be a photographer or music producer. Ooops. Now we're back to square one where you need a designated FireWire port that unlike USB has designated bandwidth in one direction and doesn't trip over moving a mouse or some data colliding with your external scratch disk.

Uh, someone born when I started college will be starting college this fall.

Anyway, the longer I've been working in the "real world," the less I care about fancy PowerPoint presentations. That said, it isn't too difficult to carry an adapter. Even if I leave the adapter in my bag all the time, it still takes up a lot less room and is more convenient than lugging around a huge "pro" machine with everything built in. I work in professional services. The main things I need a notebook for are e-mail, accessing our internal research portal, drafting documents and presentations, and occasionally reviewing Excel files. A lot of the partners carry only their iPads on short trips (leaving their notebooks at the office). Ultrabooks or MacBook Airs would be perfect if my firm supported them. The 15" Pro mockup would have the advantage of a larger screen (though if given a choice, I'd probably go with the 13" since it is easier to use on a plane).

As for the office, changes are pretty good that people who spend lots of time there have docking stations. I don't, but I have two power adapters for my notebook (one that I leave at the office, and a smaller one that stays in my bag). All our conference rooms have Wi-Fi. While we still have Ethernet at my desk, it isn't too difficult to leave an adapter there. We aren't the most advanced office by any stretch (e.g. Vista).

I'm not suggesting there is no value in having all the ports built in. I'm saying it isn't the end of the world if they aren't there. Apple is about to release a powerful new notebook with a Retina Display, and all we are hearing about are complaints that it doesn't have a VGA port (what's the last Mac that had one, anyway?) or Ethernet.
 
I don't see why many are so upset over the lack of builtin Ethernet port.. I've used an Air for a couple of years and see no trouble using a dongle. The dongle isn't large or clunky, easily fit in any bag. It works as soon as you connect it, you don't need to enable it or anything.

Most of the time I don't even need one, but for the times I do I have it in my bag. It fits right on the end of the Ethernet cable and plugs right in.

In fact you can just leave the dongle on the end of the cable, then plug it when you need. I really see no difference apart from losing a USB slot.
 
And there is no way to turn that off, right? So what's the point then? Not interested if that's the case. I recently used a 27" iMac. I find that a weird experience sitting in front of such a large screen and then all the icons, letters and everything else looks as if it was in visually impaired mode.

To clarify: my main computer right now is a ThinkPad 14" with 1400x1050 resolution. That is about the same pixel density (about 125 ppi) as the current hi res 15" MacBook. I'm looking for something a little bigger (15" would be ok) with even higher pixel density to gain screen real estate. Especially for photo editing tools and recording software this would be very beneficial.

And I want the same in a desktop, for example a 21 or maybe 24 inch iMac with similar 125-150 ppi resolution.

I don't know if it's turnoff able, I don't work at Apple, I came here to explain what Retina was, not to argue it's basis or functionality.
 
Why? What speed will it offer, what problems will it cause with work related software due to drivers?
As stated earlier in this thread, USB 2 is 480MBPS max, hardly 1000MBPS ethernet speed.
And your having a laugh (OR SERIOUSLY UNDER THE REALITY FIELD) if you think saying a simple, go and buy a $30 adapter comment, is acceptable on a $2000 machine!

I also did a quick google and could not find any USB3 to gigabit ethernet adapters which would lead me to think they are expensive if they are made.

But I guess your a typical Apple fan, ignore common sense and practicality for desirability and sex appeal in design.

But as this is a rumour I call the ditching of the ethernet port BS, unless Apple can come up with an adapter capable of running a 1000mbps and include it with every laptop.


If your company's infrastructure gets 1000MBPS average throughput on it's intranet you work for a very lucky company.
 
The whole argument coming from the ODD and port fans is founded in "inconvenience"

They simply cannot be bothered to adding a dongle to a cable or carrying another device around.

First World problems to be sure. :p

The problem is not adding the dongle, the problem is carrying four dongles around with you all the time and then you realize you don't have them with you when you need them most. And yes it's a first world problem but unfortunately may paycheck also depends on that........
 
It's really stunning how obviously a lot of Apple enthusiasts are really the kind of CoolAid drinkers they're often accused to be. Anything that is older than the attention span of the MP3/MacBook-at-Starbucks/ADHD generation obviously is useless and needs to be eliminated for something new and "advanced" (which of course can only come from Apple).

Well, guess what. If you start living in the real world outside of a college dorm - you know, the places where you work for your money and tax revenue is generated - you'll notice that VGA ports for instances are still very necessary. You'll find cables to plug in for you presentation in pretty much every conference room in the world. So for your MacBook you then need an adapter. If you forget it you can then email your PowerPoint presentation to a colleague with a PC laptop that still has such an ancient port. That is if you brought your Ethernet to Applebolt adapter because you don't have access rights to the encrypted corporate network. If by then you still have a job and were able to give your colleague the PPT presentation all your little graphics and pictures are all over the place and won't display at all because the standard PowerPoint isn't quite as advanced as you with all your little "QuickTime" gizmos.

But hey, who wants top be a corporate stiff anyway. So you'll be a photographer or music producer. Ooops. Now we're back to square one where you need a designated FireWire port that unlike USB has designated bandwidth in one direction and doesn't trip over moving a mouse or some data colliding with your external scratch disk.

haha, best comment, but all it rally means is less apple sales. It's business and as such, if a product is not fit for purpose, then it will simply move onto one that is. HP and Dell are GIANTS in the corporate world.
 
Engineer: "You know, the ethernet port is a major blocker to making this thing thinner."

Product Manager: "OK, remove it. Our data shows that less than 15% of users ever plug in an ethernet cable."

Forums: "OMG WTFBBQ?!?!?!?!1111SHIFT+1 THEY WILL REGRET THIS. THERE GOES THE PRO MARKET. APPLE FAIL"

WWDC: "Today Apple unveiled the latest in the MacBook Pro line to great fanfare. It has 100 new useful features that make it the best notebook of all time. One journalist was quoted as saying, 'the death of the ethernet port will be the end of Apple', believes that Apple made a big mistake..."

Child Born After 1995: "What is an 'ethernet' port?"

John Gruber: "Who gives a ****?"

Windows Laptop Manufacturer That Won't Be In Business In 3 Years: "We don't have to sacrifice the ethernet port. We're about more than just thinness and lightness. Look at that sexy port in the side of our plastic rattle trap. Pro."

Apple Retail: CHA-CHING!, CHA-CHING!, CHA-CHING!

Quarterly Earnings Call: "Record. Profits. Again."
 
My god!

I can't believe how much people are upset about the ethernet port.
If you're investing hundreds of dollars into a brand new computer, an additional 20 dollars isn't much for the ethernet adapter. Most users probably don't even use it that much.

But I can understand the counter arguments. The MacBook Pro is/was a computer used by professionals. Lately it has been reduced to a consumer product.
 
and this justifies the removal of the ethernet port in favor of the usb dongle how?

Most people won't care and will just get the adapter if they really need access to Ethernet. It's a business decision. If Apple thought that it was necessary to include built-in Ethernet, they'd leave it in. The Air has become their top selling notebook, so apparently most Mac buyers are OK with not having it. People who buy the Pro are likely buying it for other reasons (larger screen, more powerful CPU/GPU) rather than the Ethernet port.
 
Switch the argument around.

I DEMAND APPLE DROP ETHERNET PORTS FROM ALL DESKTOP MACS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE THEY CAN ALL HAVE WIRELESS BUILT IN AND NOBODY USES ETHERNET!

That is EXACTLY what some of you sound like, it's the EXACT same argument but I bet you would soon be shouting if Apple did it!
How many of you use the ethernet port on an iMac? It's pointless, get rid of it.
 
haha, best comment, but all it rally means is less apple sales. It's business and as such, if a product is not fit for purpose, then it will simply move onto one that is. HP and Dell are GIANTS in the corporate world.

Dell....LOL.

Market Cap as of Today

Dell = 27 billion
HP = 45 billion
Apple = 524 billion
 
Switch the argument around.

I DEMAND APPLE DROP ETHERNET PORTS FROM ALL DESKTOP MACS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE THEY CAN ALL HAVE WIRELESS BUILT IN AND NOBODY USES ETHERNET!

That is EXACTLY what some of you sound like, it's the EXACT same argument but I bet you would soon be shouting if Apple did it!
How many of you use the ethernet port on an iMac? It's pointless, get rid of it.

Desktop PCs are a bit different since portability isn't as big an issue. That said, Apple has been known to drop built-in legacy devices (floppies from the original iMac, optical drives from the latest Mini). Heck, why are there no complaints that desktop Macs no longer have ADB or SCSI ports?
 
Uh, someone born when I started college will be starting college this fall.

Anyway, the longer I've been working in the "real world," the less I care about fancy PowerPoint presentations. That said, it isn't too difficult to carry an adapter. Even if I leave the adapter in my bag all the time, it still takes up a lot less room and is more convenient than lugging around a huge "pro" machine with everything built in. I work in professional services. The main things I need a notebook for are e-mail, accessing our internal research portal, drafting documents and presentations, and occasionally reviewing Excel files. A lot of the partners carry only their iPads on short trips (leaving their notebooks at the office). Ultrabooks or MacBook Airs would be perfect if my firm supported them. The 15" Pro mockup would have the advantage of a larger screen (though if given a choice, I'd probably go with the 13" since it is easier to use on a plane).

As for the office, changes are pretty good that people who spend lots of time there have docking stations. I don't, but I have two power adapters for my notebook (one that I leave at the office, and a smaller one that stays in my bag). All our conference rooms have Wi-Fi. While we still have Ethernet at my desk, it isn't too difficult to leave an adapter there. We aren't the most advanced office by any stretch (e.g. Vista).

I'm not suggesting there is no value in having all the ports built in. I'm saying it isn't the end of the world if they aren't there. Apple is about to release a powerful new notebook with a Retina Display, and all we are hearing about are complaints that it doesn't have a VGA port (what's the last Mac that had one, anyway?) or Ethernet.

All your points taken. And I'm not looking to buy a new laptop for strict business use. For that the choices would be pretty clear - and yes would include a VGA port. Even my wife's little Acer netbook has one and she uses it for presentations (if required - she hates PPT as much as you do and we all know it's a joke to begin with...)

I was getting excited over a potential new MBP as a tool for mostly photo editing and some audio recording if it can handle it and replace my current designated music desktop PC. I really want to like Apple laptops. They look like the most sturdy solution out there currently and I'm willing to adapt to some of the unusual (for me as a ThinkPad user) approaches. There must be a reason why so many arts and design folks are using them, right?

But it looks like here I am yet again being turned down for lack of a few basics. And the new high res "retina" display appears to be all smokes and mirrors as well if it doesn't buy me more screen real estate and instead just doubles everything in size. I don't even want to know that that does to photo rendering and color accuracy. So guess I'll be back to the quest to find an appropriate replacement for my 6 year old IBM ThinkPad. Desktop shouldn't be a problem there are plenty of very powerful and reasonably priced options out there. But finding a professional laptop that serves multiple needs has become quite a problem.
 
So then why do you want you Macs to continue to have 90s technology?

Apple has NEVER prioritized backward compatibility. Anyone with a cursory understanding of Apple's design philosophies knows that. It was obvious to me in January 2008 when the Air was first unveiled that it was the future of notebook computers. Apple made that abundantly clear when they called the 2010 Air the "next generation of MacBooks," and when Steve Jobs said Blu-Ray was a "bag of hurt," and when Apple opened the Mac App Store. Apple wants to be rid of optical drives. They are slow, take up lots of room, and add more moving parts that can break. This shouldn't come as a shock to anyone.

----------



I think the addition of USB 3.0 will also mean that Apple will offer a Gigabit Ethernet USB adapter. In any case, they already exist as third-party add-ons.

Congrats - you managed to focus in on one sentence of my post, conveniently missing the paragraph underneath it where I make my actual point.

Is reading comprehension not your thing, or do you only reply to things that fit your agenda? Really. Let me know. I'm interested.

----------

15+ hours of battery life. Maybe not that much, but it's a freaking laptop and I want to work all day on it without it dying three times a day. I would sacrifice the ODD, which I never use in the first place, to have more battery life.

I must have missed this part in the original post.

Oh wait. Nope, I didn't.
 
I agree with the first part, but get your head out of your ass. We use word too. :p But seriously, the business world uses much more than just excel, and use our fair share of processing.

Touché...

I do take ownership in my computer-elitist tendencies, and I frankly said so. And I never said I was right. :D

And even the development world has less and less use for a full fledged desktop PC or Mac Pro. I'm pretty sure I could work on my Android and iOS projects (yeah, I swing both ways...) project on an air... I would probably only see the difference in disk space and when running a few VMs.
 
yeah, hmmm, what does business use more of? Oh yeah it's those crappy Dell's and HP's. Can't even buy an Apple rack mount server these day's....

There no money in it. For every server Dell sells Apple probably sells 10 iPads and then makes 30% on the backend for apps. Hence they now could buy both HP and Dell outright.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.